This article mobilizes a Spinozo–Deleuzian understanding of affect to articulate connections between embodied sensation and academic thinking, connections which surfaced during my ethnographic and autoethnographic research as a circus performer. I argue against reifying differences between the production of knowledge and of movement, suggesting we explore similarities in the conditions of their emergence including reflection, multiplicity, and responsiveness to repetition. In so doing, I challenge hegemonic ideas about who belongs in the body of an academic; inviting us to better understand our “less-rational” and more collective selves in becoming purveyors of academic knowledge.
AhmedS. (1999). She’ll wake up one of these days and find she’s turned into a nigger: Passing through hybridity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16, 87-106.
2.
AhmedS. (2004). Collective feelings: Or, the impressions left by others. Theory, Culture & Society, 21, 25-42.
3.
AhmedS. (2015). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
AndersonB. (2016). Neoliberal affects. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 734-753.
5.
BarlassinaL.NewenA. (2014). The role of bodily perception in emotion: In defense of an impure somatic theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89, 637-678.
6.
BergerR. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15, 219-234.
7.
BerlantL. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
BlackmanL.VennC. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16, 7-28.
10.
BreslerL. (2006). Embodied narrative inquiry: A methodology of connection. Research Studies in Music Education, 27, 21-43.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ChaseL. (2006). (Un)disciplined bodies: A Foucauldian analysis of women’s Rugby. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 229-247.
13.
CloughP. T. (2008). The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 1-22.
14.
CloughP. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 43-61.
15.
CloughP. T.GoldenbergG.SchiffR.WeeksA.WillseC. (2007). Notes towards a theory of affect-itself. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7, 60-77.
16.
ColebrookC. (2004). The sense of space: On the specificity of affect in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture, 15(1).
17.
CooleD.FrostS. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
CsordasT. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 18, 5-47.
19.
DastonL.GalisonP. (2007). Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
20.
DaviesC. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London, England: Routledge.
DeleuzeG. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (ConleyT. Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
24.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
FoucaultM. (1975). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
27.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In GutmanH.MartinL. H.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
28.
GatensM. (2014). Affective transitions and Spinoza’s art of joyful deliberation. In AngererM.-L.BoselB.OttM. (Eds.), Timing of affect: Epistemologies of affection (pp. 17-34). Chicago, IL: Diaphanes.
29.
GibsonB. E. (2006). Disability, connectivity and transgressing the autonomous body. Journal of Medical Humanities, 27, 187-196.
30.
GoboG. (2008). Chapter 9- How to Observe. In Doing ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
GroszE. (2010). Feminism, materialism and freedom. In CooleD.FrostS. (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 139-157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
InaharaM. (2009). This body which is not one: The body, femininity and disability. Body & Society, 15, 47-62.
34.
KobayashiA. (2003). GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough?Gender, Place & Culture, 10, 345-349.
35.
KobayashiA. (2009). Situated knowledge, reflexivity. In KitchenR.ThriftN. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
36.
KobayashiA.PeakeL. (2000). Racism out of place: Thoughts on whiteness and an antiracist geography in the new millennium. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 90, 392-403.
37.
LabareeR. V. (2002). The risk of “going observationalist”: Negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 97-122.
38.
LazzaratoM. (2008). Art, work and politics in disciplinary societies and societies of security. Radical Philosophy, 149, 1-7.
39.
LeaJ. (2009). Liberation or limitation? Understanding Iyengar yoga as a practice of the self. Body & Society, 15(3), 71-92.
40.
LynchM. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26-54.
41.
MahtaniM. (2002). Tricking the border guards: Performing race. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 425-440.
42.
MahtaniM. (2004). Mapping race and gender in the academy: The experiences of women of colour faculty and graduate students in Britain, the US and Canada. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28, 91-99.
43.
MassumiB. (2002a). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
MassumiB. (2002b). A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
MassumiB. (2015). Politics of affect. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
46.
Merleau-PontyM. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. Paris, France: Gallimard.
47.
MonroeK. R.ChiuW. F. (2010). Gender equality in the academy: The pipeline problem. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 303-308.
48.
MuhsG. G. y.NiemannY. F.GonzálezC. G.HarrisA. P. (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
49.
NavarroT. (2017). But some of us are broke: Race, gender, and the neoliberalization of the academy. American Anthropologist, 119, 506-517.
50.
PeakeL.KobayashiA. (2002). Policies and practices for an antiracist geography at the millennium. The Professional Geographer, 54, 50-61.
51.
PessoaL. (2015). Précis on the cognitive-emotional brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 1-66.
52.
ProkhovnikR. (2002). Rational woman: A feminist critique of dichotomy (2nd ed.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
53.
RancièreJ. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible (RockhilG., Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
54.
RoseG. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 305-320.
55.
RoseN.Abi-RachedJ. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
RuddickS. (2010). The politics of affect: Spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(4), 21-45.
57.
ShustermanR. (2005). Somaesthetics and Burke’s sublime. British Journal of Aesthetics, 45, 323-341.
58.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, England: Zed Books.
59.
SpinozaB. (2000). Ethics (ParkinsonG. H. R., Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
StephensL. (2012). Rethinking the Political: Art, Work and the Body in the Contemporary Circus. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Toronto, Toronto.
61.
StephensL. (2016). The economic lives of circus ‘artists’: Canadian circus performers and the new economyCanadian Journal of Communication, 40, 243-260.
62.
TurnerB. S. (2008). Somaesthetics and the critique of Cartesian dualism. Body & Society, 14, 129-133.
63.
WacquantL. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64.
WilliamsJ. (2011). Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of time: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
65.
WilliamsR. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
