The following analysis approaches the 9/11 Memorial through the lens of a moving methodology, which is grounded in the intersections of critical rhetorical theory and visual ethnography. An intersectional methodological approach takes seriously movement, affect, and aesthetics as primary modes of understanding in situ communication and reveals that the National 9/11 Memorial works affectively and viscerally to constitute the surveilling flâneur, a security-conscious consumer subjectivity who is mobilized through the temporal, horizontal, and vertical vectors of the site. Ultimately, I suggest that the Memorial’s affective dimensions position the habitus of the surveilling flâneur as reflective of larger discourses about freedom in a post-9/11 culture.
AdenR. C.HanM. W.NoranderS.PfahlM. E.PollockT. P.YoungS. L. (2009). Re-collection: A proposal for refining the study of collective memory and its places. Communication Theory, 19, 311-336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01345.x
2.
BarthesR. (1980). Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography (HowardR., Trans.). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
3.
BenjaminW. (1999). The arcades project (EilandH., Ed. & McLaughlinK., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
4.
BieseckerB. A. (2004). Renovating the national imaginary: A prolegomenon on contemporary paralegoric rhetoric. In PhillipsK. (Ed.), Framing publicm memory (pp. 212-247). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
5.
BieseckerB. A. (2007). No time for mourning: The rhetorical production of the melancholic citizen-subject in the war on terror. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 40, 147-169. doi:10.1353/par.2007.0009
6.
BlairC. (2001). Reflections on criticism and bodies: Parables from public places. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 271-294.
7.
BlairC.MichelN. (1999). Commemorating in the theme park zone: Reading the astronauts memorial. In RosteckT. (Ed.), At the intersection: Cultural studies and rhetorical studies (pp. 29-83). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8.
BlairC.MichelN. (2000). Reproducing civil rights tactics: The rhetorical performances of the Civil Rights Memorial. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30, 31-55.
9.
BlairC.MichelN. (2007). The AIDS memorial quilt and the contemporary culture of public commemoration. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 10, 595-626.
10.
BondL. (2012). Intersections or misdirections? Problematising crossroads of memory in the commemoration of 9/11. Culture, Theory and Critique, 53, 111-128. doi:10.1080/14735784.2012.680261
11.
BourdieuP. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BüscherM.UrryJ.WitchgerK. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile methods. London, England: Routledge.
13.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
CaseyE. S. (2004). Public memory in place and time. In PhillipsK. R. (Ed.), Framing public memory (pp. 17-44). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press
15.
CaseyE. S. (2007). The world at a glance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
CharlandM. (1991). Finding a horizon and telos: The challenge to critical rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 71-74.
17.
ChevretteR.HessA. (2015). Unearthing the native past: Citizen archaeology and modern (non)belonging at the Pueblo Grande Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 12, 139-158. doi:10.1080/14791420.2015.1012214
18.
ConquergoodD. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
19.
ConquergoodD. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. TDR/The Drama Review, 46, 145-156. doi:10.1162/105420402320980550
20.
DelgadoM. (2015). Urban youth and photovoice: Visual ethnography in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
DentonC. (2005). Examining documentary photography using the creative method. In SmithK.MoriartyS.BarbatsisG. (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 405-428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
DickinsonG. (1997). Memories for sale: Nostalgia and the construction of identity in Old Pasadena. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, 1-27.
24.
DickinsonG.BlairC.OttB. L. (Eds.). (2010). Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
25.
DickinsonG.OttB. L. (2013). Neoliberal capitalism, globalization, and lines of flight: Vectors and velocities at the 16th Street Mall. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 529-535. doi:10.1177/1532708613503780
26.
DickinsonG.OttB. L.AokiE. (2006). Spaces of remembering and forgetting: The reverent eye/I at the Plains Indian Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3, 27-47. doi:10.1080/14791420500505619
27.
DonofrioT. A. (2010). Ground zero and place-making authority: The conservative metaphors in 9/11 families’ “take back the memorial” rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 150-169. doi:10.1080/10570311003614492
28.
DowB. (2001). Criticism and authority in the artistic mode. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 336-348.
29.
DunnT. R. (2011). Remembering “a great fag”: Visualizing public memory and the construction of queer space. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97, 435-460. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.585168
30.
El GuindiF. (2004). Visual anthropology: Essential method and theory. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
31.
EwaltJ. (2011). A colonialist celebration of national <heritage>: Verbal, visual, and landscape ideographs at homestead national monument of America. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 367-385. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.586970
32.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
33.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An Introduction. (HurleyR., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
34.
GallagherV. (1999). Memory and reconciliation in the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2, 303-320.
35.
GaonkarD. P. (1993). Performing with fragments: Reflections on critical rhetoric. In McKerrowR. E. (Ed.), Argument and the postmodern challenge: Proceedings of the Eighth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 149-155). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
36.
HarteliusE. J. (2010). “Leave a message of hope or tribute”: Digital memorializing as public deliberation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47(2), 67-85.
37.
HaskinsE. V.DeRoseJ. P. (2003). Memory, visibility, and public space: Reflections on commemoration(s) of 9/11. Space and Culture, 6, 377-393. doi:10.1177/1206331203258373
38.
HaskinsE. V.DeRoseJ. P. (2007). Between archive and participation: Public memory in a digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37, 401-422. doi:10.1080/02773940601086794
39.
HessA.HerbigA. (2013). Recalling the ghosts of 9/11: Convergent memorializing at the opening of the National 9/11 Memorial. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2207-2230.
40.
HoskinsA. (2003). Signs of the Holocaust: Exhibiting memory in a mediated age. Media, Culture & Society, 25, 7-22. doi:10.1177/0163443703025001631
41.
IvieR. L. (1995). Productive criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81, 2.
42.
JayR. (1996). Visual anthropology. In LevinsonD.EmberM. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of cultural anthropology (Vol. 4, pp. 1345-1351). New York, NY: Henry Holt.
43.
Jorgensen-EarpC. R.LanzilottiL. A. (1998). Public memory and private grief: The construction of shrines at the sites of public tragedy. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 150-170. doi:10.1080/00335639809384211
44.
LowS. M. (2004). The memorialization ofSeptember11: Dominant and local discourses on the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site. American Ethnologist, 31, 326-339. doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.326
45.
MasseyD. B. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
McKerrowR. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 56, 91-111.
48.
MiddletonM.HessA.EndresD.Senda-CookS. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
49.
MitchellW. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MitchellW. J. T. (2011). Cloning terror: The war of images, 9/11 to the present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
OsbornM. (1967). Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light-dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53, 115-126.
52.
PaliewiczN. S.HasianM. (2016). Mourning absences, melancholic commemoration, and the contested public memories of the NationalSeptember11Memorial and Museum. Western Journal of Communication, 80, 140-162. doi:10.1080/10570314.2015.1128559
53.
PinkS. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. London, England: Routledge.
54.
PinkS. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
SturkenM. (2004). The aesthetics of absence: Rebuilding ground zero. American Ethnologist, 31, 311-325.
60.
SturkenM. (2007). Tourists of history: Memory, kitsch, and consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61.
VivianB. (2004). A timeless now: Memory and repetition. In PhillipsK. R. (Ed.), Framing public memory (pp. 187-211). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
62.
WilliamsR. (2005). Cognitive theory. In Handbook of visual communication: Theory, method, and media (pp. 193-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
WoodA. F. (2005). “What happens [in Vegas]”: Performing the post-tourist flâneur in “New York” and “Paris.” Text and Performance Quarterly25, 315-333. doi:10.1080/10462930500362403
64.
WoodsC. S.EwaltJ. P.BakerS. J. (2013). A matter of regionalism: Remembering Brandon Teena and Willa Cather at the Nebraska History Museum. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 99, 341-363. doi:10.1080/00335630.2013.806818
65.
YoungJ. E. (2006). The stages of memory at Ground Zero. In StierO. B.LandresJ. S. (Eds.), Religion, violence, memory, and place (pp. 214-234). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
66.
ZelizerB. (2004). The voice of the visual in memory. In PhillipsK. R. (Ed.), Framing public memory (pp. 157-186). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
