The premise of this article is that social science researchers often rush to application, to empirical method and methodology, before studying the history, philosophy, and politics of various empiricisms. Because there are incompatibilities between the empiricisms of different systems of thought, it is dangerous to attempt new empirical work without having studied the old empiricisms, lest those incompatibilities produce weak, fundamentally flawed scholarship. To help prevent such confusions, this article briefly describes two empiricisms commonly used in social science research—logical empiricism and the empiricism of phenomenology—as well as Deleuze and Guattari’s transcendental empiricism, which is being used in much new empirical inquiry.
AlthusserL. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In AlthusserL. (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (BrewsterB., Trans.) (pp. 127-186). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. (Reprinted from La Pensée, 1970)
2.
AuneB. (1970). Rationalism, empiricism, and pragmatism: An introduction. New York, NY: Random House.
3.
AyerA. J. (1936). Language, truth, and logic.London, England: Victor Gollancz, Ltd.
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BaughB. (1992). Transcendental empiricism: Deleuze’s response to Hegel. Man and World, 25, 133-148.
6.
BlackburnS. (1994). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BogueR. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari. London, England: Routledge.
8.
BordoS. (1986). The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 439-456.
9.
BryantL. R. (2008). Difference and givenness: Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism and the ontology of immanence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
10.
BryantL. R. (2009). Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism: Notes towards a transcendental materialism. In WillattE.LeeM. (Eds.), Thinking between Deleuze and Kant: A strange encounter (pp. 28-48). London, England: Continuum.
11.
ButlerJ. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In ButlerJ.ScottJ. W. (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CloughP. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 43-61.
13.
DahlbergH.DahlbergK. (2003). To not make definite what is indefinite: A phenomenological analysis of perception and its epistemological consequences. Journal of the Humanistic Psychologist, 31(4), 34-50.
14.
DeleuzeG. (1983). Nietzsche and philosophy (TomlinsonH., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1962)
15.
DeleuzeG. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement image (TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1983)
16.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (HurleyR., Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books. (Original work published 1970)
17.
DeleuzeG. (1990). The logic of sense (BoundasC. V., Ed. & LesterM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969)
18.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
19.
DeleuzeG. (2006). Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975-1995. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
20.
DeleuzeG.FoucaultM. (1977). Intellectuals and power. In BouchardD. F. (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (BouchardD. F.SimonS., Trans.) (pp. 205-217). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Discussion recorded March4, 1972 and reprinted from L’Arc, n.d., Vol. 49, pp. 3-10)
21.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
22.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (TomlinsonH.BurchellG., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1991)
23.
DeleuzeG.ParnetC. (1987). Dialogues (TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)
24.
DerridaJ. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (KamufP., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1993)
25.
FayB. (1987). Critical social science: Liberation and its limits. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
FoucaultM. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. New York, NY: The New Press. (Original work published 1994)
27.
FoucaultM. (1988). Life: Experience and science (HurleyR., Trans.). In FaubionJ. D. (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 465-478). New York, NY: The New Press. (Reprinted from Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 90(a), March1985, pp. 3-14)
28.
GiorgiA. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
29.
HaackS. (2007). Defending science—Within reason: Between scientism and cynicism (Paperback edition with new preface). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
30.
HabermasJ. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (ShapiroJ. J., Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968)
31.
HawkesworthM. E. (2014). Contending conceptions of science and politics. In YanowD.Schwartz-SheaP. (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 27-49). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
32.
HayekF. A. (1952). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
33.
HeinS. F. (2015, May). Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism: Establishing qualitative inquiry as pure immanence. Paper presented at the 2015 International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Champaign, IL.
34.
HumeD. (1955). An essay concerning human understanding (HendelC. W., Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1748)
35.
HusserlE. (1952). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (GibsonW. R. B., Trans.). New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1931)
36.
HusserlE. (1970). Logical investigations (Vol. 2) (FindlayJ. N., Trans.). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1901)
37.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)
38.
LawJ. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, England: Routledge.
39.
LeonelliS. (2014). What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of Big Data in biology. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-11.
40.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (BenningtonG.MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
41.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
MurphyT. S. (1998). Quantum ontology. In KaufmanE.HellerK. J. (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari: New mappings in politics, philosophy, and culture (pp. 211-229). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
NietzscheF. (1992). On the genealogy of morals. In KaufmannW. (Ed. & Trans.), Basic writings of Nietzsche (pp. 437-599). New York, NY: Modern Library. (Original work published 1887)
44.
NovackG. (1968). Empiricism and its evolution: A Marxist view. New York, NY: Merit Publishers.
45.
PattonP. (2000). Deleuze and the political. London, England: Routledge.
46.
RacevskisK. (1987). Michel Foucault, Rameau’s nephew, and the question of identity. In BernauerJ.RasmussenD. (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 21-33). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47.
RajchmanJ. (2001). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
48.
RortyR. M. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
St. PierreE. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 239-266.
50.
St. PierreE. A. (2012). Another postmodern report on knowledge: Positivism and its others. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15, 483-503.
51.
St. PierreE. A. (in press-a). Curriculum for new material, new empirical inquiry. In SnazaN. (Ed.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
52.
St. PierreE. A. (in press-b). Rethinking the empirical in the posthuman. In TaylorC. A.HughesC. L. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
ScottJ. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773-797.
54.
SellarsW. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Essay originally published in Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. I [FeiglH.ScivenM., Eds.]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956)
55.
SmithD. (2012). Concepts and creation. In BraidottiR.PistersP. (Eds.), Revisiting normativity with Deleuze (pp. 175-188). London, England: Bloomsbury.
56.
SpivakG. C. (1974). Translator’s preface. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans.) (pp. ix-xc). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
57.
StagollC. (2010). Event. In ParrA. (Ed.), The Delezue dictionary (Rev. ed., pp. 89-90). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
58.
StewartK. (2015, October). Plenary. Affect Theory Conference, Lancaster, PA.
59.
VagleM. D. (2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
60.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61.
WidderN. (2012). Political theory after Deleuze. New York, NY: Continuum.
