In 2009, Toyosaki, Pensoneau-Conway, Wendt, and Leathers developed a collaborative writing method called community autoethnography (CAE). Participants dialogically collaborate through writing in order to “resituate identified social/cultural and sensitive issues” with the explicit goals of community-building and “cultural and social intervention.” In this article, we use CAE to explore and interrogate the politics, ethics, and boundaries of our collaborations and relationships. As individuals entering this collaborative engagement, we occupy various positions in relation to each other—stranger, best friend, student-turned-colleague/friend, student-friend, sibling, and so on. Each of these positions is subsequently complicated by social positions and relational politics that necessarily inform the process of collaborative writing. We write vulnerabilities across boundaries and between relationships, and in the process, with careful purpose, we write the becoming of new relationships, the becoming of community.
AlexanderB. K.MoreiraC.kumarh.s. (2012). Resisting (resistance) stories: A tri-autoethnographic exploration of father narratives across shades of difference. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 121-133. doi:10.1177/1077800411429087
2.
BochnerA. P.EllisC. (1995). Telling and living: Narrative co-construction and the practices of interpersonal relationships. In Leeds-HurwitzW. (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 201-213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
ChangH.NgunjiriF. W.HernandezK. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
4.
DrewR. (2006). Lethargy begins at home: The academic rate-buster and the academic sloth. Text and Performance Quarterly, 26, 65-78. doi:10.1080/10462930500382591
5.
EdeL.LunsfordA. (2001). Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA, 116, 354-369.
6.
EllisC.RawickiJ. (2013). Collaborative witnessing of survival during the Holocaust: An exemplar of relational autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 366-380. doi:10.1177/1077800413479562
7.
FineM. (1998). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 130-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
FoucaultM. (1984). What is an author? In RabinowP. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 101-120). New York, NY: Pantheon.
9.
FreireP. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
FreireP. (2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International. (Original work published 1970).
11.
GaleK.MartinV.SakellariadisA.SpeedyJ.SpryT. (2012). Collaborative writing in real time. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 12, 401-407. doi:10.1177/1532708612453006
12.
GaleK.PeliasR. J.RussellL.SpryT.WyattJ. (2012). Darkness and silence: The dis/connection of writing intimacy. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 407-426.
13.
GaleK.PineauE. L. (2011). Flows, tides, and transatlantic drifts: An emergent methodology of collaborative performative writing. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4, 317-334.
14.
GaleK.SpeedyJ.WyattJ. (2010). Gatecrashing the oasis? A joint doctoral dissertation play. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 21-28. doi:10.1177/1077800409349758
15.
GergenM. M.GergenK. J. (2002). Ethnographic representation as relationship. In BochnerA. P.EllisC. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 11-33). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
16.
MairsN. (2000). Nancy Mairs on finding a voice. In McQuadeD.AtwanR. (Eds.), The writer’s presence: A pool of readings (3rd ed., pp. 157-158). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
17.
MoreiraC.DiversiM. (2012). Betweeners speak up: Challenging knowledge production through collaborative writing and visceral knowledge in decolonizing times. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 399-406.
18.
PennycookA. (1994). Towards a critical pedagogy for teaching English as a worldy language. In The cultural politics of English as an international language (pp. 295-327). London, England: Longman.
19.
Pensoneau-ConwayS. L.ToyosakiS.Tankei-AminianS.Aminian-TankeiF. (in press). Community autoethnography: Critical visceral way of “doing” intercultural relationships. In HaydariN.HolmesP. (Eds.), Case studies in intercultural dialogue. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
20.
PineauE. L. (2012). Haunted by ghosts: Collaborating with absent others. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 459-465.
21.
PollockD. (1998). Performing writing. In PhelanP.LaneJ. (Eds.), The ends of performance (pp. 73-103). New York: New York University Press.
22.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon.
23.
SchragC.O (1986). Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
SpeedyJ. (2012). Collaborative writing and ethical know-how: Movements within the space around scholarship, the academy and the social research imaginary. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 349-356.
25.
TamasS. (2011). Life after leaving: The remains of spousal abuse. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
26.
ThurlowC. (2010). Speaking of difference: Language, inequality, and interculturality. In NakayamaT. K.HalualaniR. T. (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 227-247). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
ToyosakiS. (2012). Praxis-oriented autoethnography: Performing critical selfhood. In BardhanN.OrbeM. P. (Eds.), Identity research and communication: Intercultural reflections and future directions (pp. 239-251). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
28.
ToyosakiS.PensoneauS. L. (2005). Yaezakura—Interpersonal culture analysis. International Journal of Communication, 15, 51-88.
29.
ToyosakiS.Pensoneau-ConwayS.L.WendtN.A.LeathersK. (2009). Community autoethnography: Compiling the personal and resituating whiteness. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 9, 56-83. doi:10.1177/1532708608321498
30.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (2010). Deleuzian thought and collaborative writing: A play in four acts. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 730-741. doi:10.1177/1077800410374299
31.
WyattJ.GaleK.RussellL.PeliasR. J.SpryT. (2011). How writing touches: An intimate scholarly collaboration. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4, 253-278.
32.
ZussM. (1999). Politics of mètissage. In Subject present: Life-writings and strategies of representation (pp. 85-112). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
