Higher education around the world is currently undergoing a neo-liberal administrative takeover. The drive to reduce costs and increased bureaucratization do not serve any other purpose than increasing the power of the universities’ administration. The reasons for allowing this situation to happen are related to scholars’ inertia and subscribing to a belief that academia can and should be impractical. As a result, the emerging corporate university, McDonaldized model relies increasingly on contingent and deskilled faculty, effectively eliminating the traditional academic freedoms. We conclude with suggestions for possible courses of action to make a constructive counter-movement to the radical changes taking place. We propose that we can begin addressing the predicaments of higher education through re-discovering our role in the society, by re-conceptualizing the disciplinary boundaries of academic fields, by forcing the de-bunkerization of academic career and work, and by starting up multi-disciplinary learning communities at universities. We argue that collective action is needed immediately, if any positive change is possible at all before more of higher education is more deeply degraded.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA. D. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AdamsJ. D. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 253-278.
3.
AdlerN.HarzingA.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 72-95.
4.
AllenM.AinleyP. (2010). Lost generation? New strategies for youth and education. London, England: Continuum.
5.
AltbachP. G.GumportP. J.BerdahlR. O. (2011). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
AlvessonM.HardyC.HarleyB. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 480-501.
BenklerY. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
BerryJ. (2005). Reclaiming the ivory tower: Organizing adjuncts to change higher education. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
13.
BirnbaumR. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
BlacklerF. (1993). Knowledge and the theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 863-884.
15.
BodenR.CiancanelliP.WrightS. (2012). Trust universities? Governance for post-capitalist futures. Journal of Co-Operative Studies, 45, 16-24.
16.
BousquetM. (2002). The waste product of graduate education: Toward a dictatorship of the flexible. Social Text, 20, 81-104.
17.
BousquetM. (2008). How the university works: Higher education and the low-wage nation. New York: New York University Press.
18.
BravermanH. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
19.
BrintS. (2002). The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
BurganM. (2006). What ever happened to the faculty? Drift and decision in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
CaseP.SelvesterK. (2002). Watch your back reflections on trust and mistrust in management education. Management Learning, 33, 231-247.
23.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
24.
CavanaughJ. C. (2009, March13). Cost reductions and tuition restraint: Been there, done that. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 34-36.
25.
ChomskyN.LewontinR. C.MontgomeryD. (1997). The Cold War & the university: Toward an intellectual history of the postwar years. New York, NY: New Press.
26.
ClarkeM.ButcherD. (2009). Political leadership, bureaucracies and business schools: A comfortable union?Management Learning, 40, 587-607.
27.
ColliniS. (2012). What are universities for?New York, NY: Penguin.
28.
CunliffeA. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33, 35-61.
29.
CyranoskiD.GilbertN.LedfordH.NayarA.YahiaM. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472, 276-279.
30.
CzarniawskaB. (1999). Writing management: Organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
CzarniawskaB. (2001a). Having hope in paralogy. Human Relations, 54, 13-21.
32.
CzarniawskaB. (2001b). Is it possible to be a constructionist consultant?Management Learning, 32, 253-266.
33.
CzarniawskaB.GenellK. (2002). Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the market. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 455-474.
DworkinR. (1996). We need a new interpretation of academic freedom. In MenandL. (Ed.), The future of academic freedom. (pp. 187-198). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
EhrenbergR. G. (2007). What’s happening to public higher education? The shifting financial burden. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
EhrensalK. (2008). From teachers to professors: A tale of identities, ideologies, change, conflict and lots of other good organizational “stuff.”Tamara Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 7, 54-66.
38.
FolbreN. (2010). Saving state U: Fixing public higher education. New York, NY: New Press.
39.
FrankD.GablerJ. (2006). Reconstructing the university: Worldwide shifts in academia in the 20th century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
FreireP. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
GinsbergB. (2011). The fall of the faculty: The rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
GouldE. (2003). The university in a corporate culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
GreenwoodD. J. (2009). Are research universities knowledge-intensive learning organizations? In JemielniakD.KociatkiewiczJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on knowledge-intensive organizations (pp. 1-18). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
45.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 85-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (2001). Re-organizing universities and “knowing how”: University restructuring and knowledge creation for the 21st century. Organization, 8, 433-440.
47.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (2005). Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (2nd edition, pp. 43-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (2007). The future of universities: Action research and the transformation of higher education. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 211-226). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
49.
HardingA. (2007). Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development and the knowledge economy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
HillD. (2008). Contesting neoliberal education: Public resistance and collective advance. London, England: Routledge.
53.
HunterC.JemielniakD.PostułaA. (2010). Temporal and spatial shifts within playful work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23, 87-102.
54.
JemielniakD. (2006). The management science as a practical field: In support of action research. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 6(3), 163-170.
55.
KirpD. L. (2004). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
KleinN. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
57.
KolodnyA. (1998). Failing the future: A dean looks at higher education in the twenty-first century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58.
KoppellJ. G. S. (2003). The politics of quasi-government: Hybrid organizations and the dynamics of bureaucratic control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LarsonE. W.GobeliD. H. (1987). Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. California Management Review, 29(4), 126-135.
61.
LevinM.GreenwoodD. J. (2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, England: Sage.
62.
LevinM.GreenwoodD. J. (2011). Revitalizing universities by reinventing the social sciences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 27-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
MarginsonS.ConsidineM. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance, and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
McAleerE.McHughM. (1994). University departments as professional service firms. International Journal of Educational Management, 8, 20-24.
68.
McMahonW. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
PowerM. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
NewfieldC. (2008). Unmaking the public university: The forty-year assault on the middle class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
NobleD. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Science as Culture, 7, 355-368.
73.
ÖzbilginM. F. (2009). From journal rankings to making sense of the world. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 113-121.
74.
ParkerM.WeikE. (2013). Free spirits? The academic on the aeroplane. Management Learning. Advance online publication. doi:2010.1177/1350507612466210
75.
PerritonL.HodgsonV. (2013). Positioning theory and practice question(s) within the field of management learning. Management Learning, 44, 144-160. doi:2010.1177/1350507612443939
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1978)
78.
ReadingsB. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
RossA. (2009). The rise of the global university. In The Edu-factory Collective (Ed.), Towards Global Autonomous University (pp. 18-31). New York, NY: Autonomedia.
80.
RuchR. S. (2003). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
81.
SchönD. (1983). The reflexive practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
82.
SchusterJ. H.FinkelsteinM. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
83.
Sharp, PhillipA. (1994). The Biomedical Sciences in Context. In GustonDavid H.KennistonKenneth (Eds.), The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84.
ShenhavY. A. (1999). Manufacturing rationality: The engineering foundations of the managerial revolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
85.
ShoreC.TaitzM. (2012). Who “owns” the university? Institutional autonomy and academic freedom in an age of knowledge capitalism. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10, 201-219.
86.
ShoreC.WrightS. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, 557-575.
87.
ShumarC. (2008). Structure and agency in the neoliberal university. London, England: Routledge.
88.
ShumarW. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London, England: Falmer Press.
89.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
90.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8, 154-161.
91.
StrathernM. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London, England: Routledge.
92.
TuchmanG. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
93.
WashburnJ. (2006). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of higher education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
94.
WedlinL. (2011). Going global: Rankings as rhetorical devices to construct an international field of management education. Management Learning, 42, 199-218.
