This critical case study of a decision to name a university’s football stadium after a private prison company is presented from an autoethnographic perspective to discuss individual and group responses to the decision. Highlighted in the analysis are implications for faculty governance. Readers are encouraged to consider how their own institution’s governance structures are equipped to address similar affronts to democratic governance and the moral obligation of a university committed to the public good. It is intended that the analysis of the reaction of one university will facilitate the opportunities for developing proactive agendas for safeguarding the role of universities as public spheres for democratic engagement.
CollisD. (2001). When industries change: The future of higher education. Continuing Higher Education Review, 65, 7-24.
7.
DelbancoA. (2012). College: What it was, is and should be. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Del FaveroM. (2003). Faculty-administrator relationships as integral to high-performing governance system: New Frameworks for study. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 902-922.
9.
EllisC. (2009). Fighting back or moving on: An autoethnographic response to critics. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2, 371-378.
10.
FichtenbaumR. (2012). After the corporate university. Now what?Academe, 98. 56.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
13.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
14.
GatensR.JohnsonM. (2011). Holocaust, genocide and human rights education: Learning political competencies for 21st century citizenship. International Journal of Social Studies, 1, 35-47.
GinsbergB. (2011). The fall of the faculty and the rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
GirouxH. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 425-463.
18.
GirouxH. A. (2010). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. Educational Forum, 74, 184-196.
19.
HollingerD. A. (2001). Faculty governance, the University of California and the future of academe. Academe, 87, 30-33.
20.
JenlinkP. M. (2005). On bricolage and the intellectual work of the scholar practitioner. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3, 3-12.
21.
KezarA. (2005). Consequences of radical change in governance: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 634-668.
22.
KezarA.EckelP. (2004). Meeting today’s governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 371-399.
23.
KincheloeJ. (2008). Critical pedagogy. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
LincolnY.DenzinN. (2011). Epilog: Toward a “refunctioned ethnography.” In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 715-718). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
MillsN. (2012). The corporatization of higher education. Dissent, 4, 6-9.
27.
MinorJ. T. (2004). Understanding faculty senates: Moving from mystery to models. Review of Higher Education, 27, 343-363.
28.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
PostalL.TravisS. (2013, February10). Throwing spitballs can land students in jail: Bad behavior spurs arrests of students. South Florida Sun Sentinel, pp. 1A, 16A.
30.
SalterB.TapperT. (2002). The external pressures on governance of universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 245-256.
31.
SchoormanD.Acker-HocevarM. (2010). Viewing faculty governance within a social justice framework: Struggles and possibilities for democratic decision making in higher education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43, 310-325.
32.
SchoormanD.Acker-HocevarM. (2013) Faculty governance in neoliberal educational contexts: Challenges for democratic decision making. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 43, 265-285.
33.
SchoormanD.BogotchI. (2010). Moving beyond “diversity” to “social justice”: The challenge to re-conceptualize multicultural education. Intercultural Education, 21, 79-85.
34.
SpryT. (2011). Performative ethnography: Critical embodiments and possibilities. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 497-511). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
