The reader is asked to imagine a world without data, a world without method, a world without a hegemonic politics of evidence., a world where no one counts, a world without end.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 3/e (pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
DavidsonJ.Silvanadi G. (2011). Qualitative research and technology in the midst of a revolution. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 4/e (pp. 627-643). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
DenzinN. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
4.
DenzinN. K. (2012). The politics of evidence. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 4/e (pp. 645-659). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
EisenhartM.JurowA. S. (2011). “Teaching qualitative research.” In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 4/e (pp. 699-714). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
GomezA.PuigvertL.FlechaR. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 235-246; .
7.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. London, UK: Routledge.
8.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
9.
KaplanE. (2004). With god on their side: How Christian fundamentalists trampled science, policy, and democracy in the George Bush’s White House. New York, NY: The New Press.
10.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2010). Validity, responsibility and apora. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 603-610.
11.
LarnerG. (2004). “Family therapy and the politics of evidence.” Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 17.
LincolnY. S.LynhamS. A.GubaE. G. (2011). “Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited.” In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 4/e (pp. 97-128 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
MacLureM. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
15.
MacLureM. (2006). “The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 729-746.
16.
MacLureM. (2011). “Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins?” Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 997-1005.
MadisonD. S. (2010). Acts of activism: Human rights as radical performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
MaxwellJ. A. (2004). Reemergent scientism, postmodernism, and dialogue across differences. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 35-41.
20.
MorseJ. M. (2006). Reconceptualizing Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 415-422.
21.
OnwuegbuzieA. I. (2012). “Introduction: Putting the MIXED back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle.” International Journal if Multiple Reserach Approaches, 6, 192-219.
22.
RichardsonL. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2/e (pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, 2/e. London, UK: Zed Books.
24.
St. PierreAdamsE.PillowW. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
St. PierreAdamsE. (2011). “Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after.” In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 4/e (pp. 611-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
StokerB. (1897). Dracula. London, UK: Archibald Constable and Company.
27.
StronachIGarrattD.PearceC.PiperH. (2007). “Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method.” Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 179-203.
