The article considers the productive capacity for wonder that resides and radiates in data, or rather in the entangled relation of data-and-researcher. Wonder is not necessarily a safe, comforting, or uncomplicatedly positive affect. It shades into curiosity, horror, fascination, disgust, and monstrosity. But the price paid for the ruin caused—to epistemic certainty or the comforts of a well-wrought coding scheme—is, after Massumi (2002, p. 19), the privilege of a headache. Not the answer to a question, but the astute crafting of a problem and a challenge: what next?
AllmerP.MacLureM.MacRaeC.HolmesR.JonesL. (2010, May). Offending items: Children’s objects as incursions through the threshold of the classroom. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver.
2.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BrownB., (1998) How to do things with things: A toy story. Critical Inquiry, 24(4), 935-954.
4.
DastonL. J.ParkK. (2001). Wonders and the order of nature, 1150-1750. New York, NY: Zone Books.
5.
DeLandaM. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London, UK: Continuum.
6.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (2004). A thousand plateaus (MassumiB., Trans.). London, UK: Continuum.
8.
EvansR. J. W.MarrA. (Eds.). (2006). Curiosity and wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press.
9.
JonesL.MacLureM.HolmesR.MacRaeC. (2012). Children and objects: Affection and infection. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 32(1), 49-60.
10.
LugliA. (1986, Autumn). Inquiry as collection. Res, 109-124.
11.
MacLureM. (2006). The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method. Qualitative Studies in Education19, 729-745.
12.
MacLureM. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy25, 277-286.
13.
MacLureM. (2013). Classification or wonder: Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In ColemanR.RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
MacLureM. (in press-b). Researching without representation: Language and materiality in post qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.
15.
MacLureM.JonesL.HolmesR.MacRaeC. (2012). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal38, 447-471.
16.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
MaurièsP. (2002). Cabinets of curiosities. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
18.
MazzeiL.JacksonA. Y. (2011, July). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Paper presented at the 2011 Summer Institute in Qualitative Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
19.
StaffordB. (2004). Revealing technologies/magical domains. In StaffordB.TerpakF. (Eds.), Devices of wonder: From the world in a box to images on a screen (pp. 1-109). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.
20.
WhiteheadA. N. (1934). Nature and life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
