Provocations,Re-Un-Visions,Death,and Other Possibilities of “Data”

Baudrillard J. (2000). The vital illusion. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Blaikie N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. London, UK: Sage.

Daza S. (2013). A promiscuous (feminist) look at grant-science: How colliding imaginaries shape the practice of NSF policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 580-598.

Deleuze G. (2004). The logic of sense. London, UK: Continuum.

Jones L. Holmes R. MacRae C. MacLure M. (2010). Documenting classroom life: How can I write about what I am seeing? Qualitative Research, 10, 479-491.

MacLure M. Holmes R. MacRae C. Jones L. (2010). Animating classroom ethnography, overcoming video-fear. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 543-556.

Mazzei L. McCoy K. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 503-509.

Scheurich J. (2000). A RoUGH, ramBling, strAnGe, muDDy, CONfusing, e1LIPtical Kut: From an archaeology of plain talk. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 337-348.

Schostak J. Schostak J. (2008). Radical research: Designing, developing and writing research to make a difference. London, UK: Routledge.

St. Pierre E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.