This essay explores the commemorative site of Fleury-devant-Douaumont (Fleury), a village destroyed during the battle of Verdun in 1916. We argue that Fleury offers a creative rhetoric of imagining otherwise by rendering a doubled demand on the imagination. It provokes visitors to attend to the fact of war’s overwhelming destructiveness. And simultaneously, it urges them to imagine the counterfactual, the “not having happened”—Fleury as a tiny and vibrant community as it would have been in the absence of war. In doing so, Fleury’s rhetoric opposes itself to a stance that sanitizes, justifies, or glorifies war.
Audoin-RouzeauS.BeckerA. (2002). 14-18: Understanding the Great War (TemersonC., Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
2.
BarrettM. (2007). Subalterns at war: First World War colonial forces and the politics of the Imperial War Graves Commission. Interventions: The International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 9, 451-474.
3.
BartovO. (1996). Murder in our midst: The Holocaust, industrial killing and representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeckP. J. (2012). Presenting history: Past and present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BeckerA. (1998). War and faith: The religious imagination in France, 1914-1930 (McPhailH., Trans.). New York: Berg.
6.
BeckerA. (2009). Artists, commemorations, and political culture: The example of the Great War (BrewerD., Trans.). In LorcinP. M. E.BrewerD. (Eds.), France and its spaces of war: Experience, memory, image (pp. 225-235). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BlackJ. (2011). The Great War and the making of the modern world. London: Continuum.
8.
BlairC.DickinsonG.OttB. L. (2010). “Rhetoric/memory/place.” In Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials (pp. 1-54). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
9.
BrookR. (1920). The soldier. In UntermeyerL. (Ed.), Modern British poetry. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe. Retrieved from www.bartleby.com/103/
10.
BurleighM. (1999). Nazi Europe: What if Nazi Germany had defeated the Soviet Union? In FergusonN. (Ed.), Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals (pp. 321-347). New York: Basic Books.
11.
CapdevilaL.VoldmanD. (2006). War dead: Western societies and the casualties of war. (VeaseyR., Trans.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12.
ClairR. P. (1997). Organizing silence: Silence as voice and voice as silence in the narrative exploration of the Treaty of New Echota. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 315-337.
13.
CloutH. D. (1996). After the ruins: Restoring the countryside of northern France after the Great War. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
DeMulderW. (2010). Mood in French. In RothsteinB.ThieroffR. (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp. 157-178). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
FergusonN. (1999). Virtual history: Towards a “chaotic” theory of the past. In FergusonN. (Ed.), Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals (pp. 1-90). New York: Basic Books.
FragnonJ. (2009). A disembodied memory: The contemporary legacy of the Great War viewed through the lens of the political (BrewerD., Trans.). In LorcinP. M. E.BrewerD. (Eds.), France and its spaces of war: Experience, memory, image (pp. 149-162). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GoebelS. (2007). The Great War and medieval memory: War remembrance and medievalism in Britain and Germany, 1914-1940. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GranoD. A. (2009). Muhammad Ali versus the “Modern Athlete”: On voice in mediated sports culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26(3), 191-211. doi:10.1080/15295030903015088.
22.
GunnJ. (2010). On speech and public release. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 13(2), 1-41.
23.
HamiltonA. (1994). Skeletons of empire: Australians and the Burma-Thailand Railway. In Darian-SmithK.HamiltonP. (Eds.), Memory and history in twentieth century Australia (pp. 92-112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HansenA. C. (2008). Reading sonic culture in Emerson’s “Self-Reliance”. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 11, 417-437.
JonesK. T.ZagackiK. S.LewisT. V. (2007). Communication, liminality, and hope: The September 11th missing person posters. Communication Studies, 58(1), 105-121.
27.
KramerA. (2007). Dynamic of destruction: Culture and mass killing in the First World War. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
LebowR. N. (2010). Forbidden fruit: Counterfactuals and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
LloydD. W. (1998). Battlefield tourism: Pilgrimage and the commemoration of the Great War in Britain, Australia and Canada, 1919-1939. Oxford: Berg.
30.
MacDonaldW. (1922). Reconstruction in France. London: Macmillan.
31.
MarquesR. (2009). On the selection of mood in complement clauses. In HogewegL.deHoopH.MalchukovA. (Eds.). Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality (pp. 179-204). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
32.
Michelin Illustrated Guides to the Battle-Fields, 1914-1918. (1919/1994). Verdun and the battles for its possession. Easingwold, UK: G. H. Smith & Son.
33.
MilesM. (1997). Art, space and the city: Public art and urban futures. London: Routledge.
34.
MitchellW. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
NoraP. (1992). Introduction to Realms of memory (Vol. 3). In NoraP.KritzmanL. D. (Eds.), Realms of Memory: The construction of the French past: Symbols (GoldhammerA., Trans., Vol. 3, pp. ix-xii). New York: Columbia University Press.
OnoK. A. (1997). A letter/essay I’ve been longing to write in my personal/academic voice. Western Journal of Communication, 61(1), 114-125.
41.
OttB. L.AokiE.DickinsonG. (2011). Ways of (not) seeing guns: Presence and absence at the Cody Firearms Museum. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(3), 215-239. doi:10.1080/14791420.2011.594068
42.
PalmerF. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
ProstA. (1992). Verdun. In NoraP. (Ed.), Realms of memory: The construction of the French past: Symbols (GoldhammerA., Trans., Vol. 3, pp. 377-401). New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
SaundersN. J. (2004). Introduction. In SaundersN. J. (Ed.), Matters of conflict: Material culture, memory and the First World War (pp. 1-4). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
45.
ShermanD. J. (1999). The construction of memory in interwar France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
SimkinsP.JukesG.HickeyM. (2003). The First World War: The war to end all wars. Oxford: Osprey.
47.
SmithC. H.HillC. R. (1920). Rising above the ruins in France: An account of the progress made since the Armistice in the devastated regions. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
48.
StevensonD. (2004) Cataclysm: The First World War as political tragedy. New York: Basic Books.
WattsE. K. (2001). “Voice” and “voicelessness” in rhetorical studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(2), 179-196.
51.
WhitmarshA. (2001). “We will remember them”: Memory and commemoration in war museums. Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies, 7, n.p. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jcms.7013
52.
YoungJ. E. (2000). At memory’s edge: After-images of the Holocaust in contemporary art and architecture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
ZelizerB. (2004). The voice of the visual in memory. In PhillipsK. (Ed.), Framing public memory (pp. 157-186). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
54.
ZelizerB. (2010). About to die: How news images move the public. New York: Oxford University Press.
