The purpose of the present study is to conceptualize engagement as both theoretical and methodological in relation to social movements. Theoretically, engagement is seen as central to activism and is addressed as a complex ontological and teleological phenomenon in relation to social movements. Methodologically, engagement is addressed in terms of (a) the role of the researcher, (b) the perspective espoused by the researcher, (c) how and why the researcher enters into and enacts with the cultural phenomenon, (d) how the researcher tends to the subjects and (e) how the researcher presents the story. This methodological approach is referred to as engaged ethnography. The main story (and history) of the contemporary antisweatshop movement as well as embedded stories of the movement, especially as they unfold at Purdue University (e.g., stories of the researcher’s background, and stories surrounding various strategies like, hunger strikes, bringing activists from the Dominican Republic to campus, and giving yellow roses to the president, or not) are provided and discussed according to the concept of engagement.
AlexanderB. K. (2011). Standing in the wake: A critical auto/ethnographic exercise on reflexivity in three movements. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 98-107.
2.
BerryK.ClairR. P. (Eds.). (2011). The call of ethnographic reflexivity: Narrating the self’s presence in ethnography [Special issue]. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 95-209.
3.
BowersJ. W.OchsD. J. (1971). The rhetoric of agitation and control. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
CharlandM. (1987). Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the peuple Québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73, 133-150.
5.
ClairR. P. (1998). Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. Albany: State University New York Press.
6.
ClairR. P. (2003). The changing story of ethnography. In ClairR. P. (Ed.) Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods (pp. 3-26). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
ClairR. P. (2006). Narratives in the old neighborhood: An ethnographic study of a neighborhood’s stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 1244-1261.
8.
ClairR. P. (2011). Reflexivity and rhetorical ethnography: From family farm to orphanage and back again. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 117-128.
9.
ClairR. P. (2012). Rhetorical ingenuity in the new global realities: A case of the anti-sweatshop movement. KB JournalVol. 8 (Spring).
10.
ConquergoodD. (1994). Homeboys and hoods: Gang communication and cultural space. In FreyL. (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 23-55) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DenzinN. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
ElavskyC. M. (2009). United as ONE: Live 8 and the politics of the global music media spectacle. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 21, 384-410.
13.
ElavskyC. M. (2010). How you gonna save y/our soul? Tempering corporate identity in a global age. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 10, 175-186.
14.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (Eds.). (1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
15.
EllisC.FlahertyM. G. (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
16.
FeatherstoneL., & United Students Against Sweatshops. (2002). Students against sweatshops. London, UK: Verso.
17.
FineM. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
GuigniM. (2004). Social protest and policy change: Ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
HabermasJ. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 49, 33-37.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London, UK: Verso.
25.
LincolnY. S.DenzinN. K. (1994). The fifth moment. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 575-586). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
LyotardJ.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (BenningtonG.MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
27.
MadisonD. S. (2011). The labor of reflexivity. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 129-138.
28.
MarcusG. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563-574). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
McGeeM. C. (1975). In search of “the people”: A rhetorical alternative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 235-249.
30.
NordhouseT.ShellenbergerM. (2007). Break through: From the death of environmentalism to the politics of possibility. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
RichardsonL. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
SkeatW. W. (1963). A concise etymological dictionary of the English language. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.
35.
StewartC. J. (1999). Championing the rights of others and challenging evil: The ego function in the rhetoric of other-directed social movements. Southern Journal of Communication, 64, 91-105.
36.
StewartC.SmithC.DentonR. E.Jr. (1984). Persuasion and social movements. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
37.
SykesJ. B. (Ed.). (1982). The concise Oxford dictionary (7th ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
