This article examines the interplay of abortion and nationalism in French and U.S. print news discussions of abortion-related issues. U.S. news stories on RU-486 and French news stories on prolife direct action protesters are rife with qualifiers designating each issue as a foreign one. In American media, RU-486 is the French pill; in French media, protesters are American inspired/mobilized. Together, these cases constitute a site for the recurrent construction of the relation between nationhood, national identity, and moral goodness. In each case, media narratives of abortion-related issues reveal that more is at stake than reproductive rights issues. The authors argue that discourses on abortion are grounded in politics of nationalism that shore up the boundaries of the homeland and anchor the distinction between public and private spheres through a discourse of opposition to foreign cultural invaders. The articulation of moral conflict over abortion and myths of foreign origins situate the national collectivity as a good, innocent victim of corrupt outside influence.
Aulagnon, M., & Dassonville, A. (1996, March 8). Les attaques contre les droits des femmes relancent le féminisme. Le Monde. Retrieved September 8, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic World database.
2.
Balsamo, A. (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
Bataille, C. (1988). RU-486: C’est aux femmes de faire la loi!Cahiers du féminisme, 4, 4-7.
4.
Berlant, L. (1997). The Queen of America goes to Washington City: Essays on sex and citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
Bernstein, N. (2003, September 28). For Americans, it’s French sissies versus German hemen. The New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
6.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brunerie-Kaufman, J. (1995). Droit a l’avortement. Ras l’front. Retrieved February 20, 2002, from http://www.raslfront.org/txtresist/61.html
8.
Carey, J., & Levine, J. (1990, December 17). Can the abortion pill save lives?Business Week, 3192, 56. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
9.
Cue, E. (1998, March 9). Sacrebleu! French youth prefer Coke. U.S. News & World Report, 38. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
10.
Cue, E. (1999, March 9). A battle over French blood. U.S. News & World Report, 47. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
11.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.
12.
Duden, B. (1993). Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Eakin, E. (2001, April 15). Lost illusions: Bringing back Bardot. The New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
14.
Edernet, G. (1992). RU 486, le chiffre de la Bete. Le mouvement contre le droit des femmes a l’avortement en France. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 133, 29-43.
15.
Edmondson, G. (1997, March 3). No strength, no glory. Business Week, 3516, 46-46.
16.
Erikson, K. (1966). Wayward puritans. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Fassin, E. (1995). Fearful symmetry: Culturalism and cultural comparison after Tocqueville. French Historical Studies, 19, 452-460.
18.
Fassin, E. (2001). Same sex, different politics: ‘Gay marriage’ debates in France and the United States. Public Culture, 13, 215-232.
19.
Follea, L. (1996, November 29). Un intégrisme inspiré des mouvements pro-vie américains. Le Monde. Retrieved September 8, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
20.
Gaines, J. (1991, May 2). New Hampshire may offer to be test site for abortion pills. Boston Globe. Retrieved September 21, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
21.
Gallard, C., & Gabison, C. (1998). Les opposants à l’avortement en France. Éspace de libertés, 257, 14-15.
22.
Gaonkar, D. P. (2002). Toward new imaginaries: An introduction. Public Culture, 14, 1-19.
23.
Gauchet, M. (1998). La religion dans la démocratie: Parcours de la laïcité. Paris: Gallimard.
24.
Gibson, R. (1995). The best of enemies. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.
25.
Gordon, B. (1999). The decline of a cultural icon: France in American perspective. French Historical Studies, 22, 625-651.
26.
Gordon, P. H., & Meunier, S. (2001). The French challenge: Adapting to globalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
27.
Granger, A.- M. (1992). Un droit a conquérir sans cesse. Cahiers du féminisme, 31, 29-32.
28.
Greenfield, L. (1992). Nationalism: Five roads to modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Grossberg, M. (1996, November 16). Metro Music Theater offers brilliant ‘Brel’. The Columbus Dispatch, 3H-3H.
30.
Holden, S. (1998, August 14). Reviving a sunny French confection. The New York Times, E28-E28.
31.
Jennings, J. (2000). Citizenship, republicanism and multiculturalism in contemporary France. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 575-598.
32.
King, L., & Husting, G. (2003). Anti-abortion activism in the U.S. and France: Comparing opportunity environments of rescue tactics. Mobilization, 8, 297-312.
33.
Kuisel, R. (1993). Seducing the French: The dilemma of Americanization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Laborde, C. (2001). The cultures of the republic: Nationalism and multiculturalism in French republican thought. Political Theory, 29, 716-735.
35.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167-195.
37.
Lawday, D. (1990, May 28). Where all the dwarfs are grumpy. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
38.
Levy, S. (1997, December 15). Getting away with it. Newsweek. Retrieved September 20, 2001, from Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe database.
39.
Marcus, A. (2002). Bush plan for fetal health care sets off storm. Healthfinder. Retrieved May 1, 2003, from http://www.healthfinder.gov/news/newsstory.asp?docID=505814
40.
Mathy, J. P. (1993). Extrême-occident: French intellectuals and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Mathy, J. P. (1995). The resistance to French theory in the United States: A cross-cultural inquiry. French Historical Studies, 19, 331-347.
42.
Mathy, J. P. (2000). French resistance: The French-American culture wars. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
Mathy, J. P. (2003a). The symptom of American-style feminism. In R. Célestin, E. DalMolin, & I. de Courtivron (Eds.), Beyond French feminisms: Debates on women, politics, and culture in France, 1981-2001(pp. 243-260). New York: Palgrave-McMillan.
44.
Mathy, J. P. (2003b). The system of Francophobia. French Politics, Culture & Society, 21, 24-33.
45.
Meckler, L. (2002, September 28). New rule adds fetal health coverage. Wichita Eagle. Retrieved May 4, 2003, from http:ww.kansas.com/mld/eagle/4167447.htm
46.
Méricourt, O. (1992). Les enjeux du droit à l’avortement. Cahiers du féminisme, p. 23-23.
47.
Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.
48.
Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and sexuality: Respectability and abnormal sexuality in modern Europe. New York: Howard Fertig.
49.
Nagel, J. (2000). Ethnicity and sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 107-133.
50.
Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity and sexuality: Intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers.New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
Nye, R. (1999). Sex and sexuality in France since 1800. In F. X. Eder, L. A. Hall, & G. Hekma (Eds.), Sexual cultures in Europe: National histories(pp. 91-113). New York: Manchester University Press.
52.
Parker, A., Russo, M., Sommer, D., & Yaeger, P. (Eds.). (1992). Nationalisms and sexualities. New York: Routledge.
53.
Pear, R. (2002, September 28). Bush rule makes fetuses eligible for health benefits. The New York Times, p. A13-A13.
54.
Peer, S. (1995). French civilization and its discontents. French Historical Studies, 19, 415-432.
55.
Rosenberg, D., Ingrassia, M., & Begle, S. (1995, September 28). Blood and tears. Newsweek, p. 66-66.
56.
Ross, K. (1995). Fast cars, clean bodies: Decolonization and the reordering of French culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
Saguy, A. C. (1999). Puritanism and promiscuity? Sexual attitudes in France and the United States. Comparative Social Research, 18, 227-247.
58.
Saguy, A. C. (2000). Sexual harrassment in France and the United States: Activists and public figures defend their definitions. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology(pp. 56-93). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Schrof, J. (1993, March 22). Reproduction showdown. U.S. News & World Report, pp. 32-34.
60.
Simonds, W., Ellertson, C., Springer, K., & Winikoff, B. (1998). Abortion, revised participants in the U.S. clinical trials evaluate Mifepristone. Social Science Medicine, 46, 313-323.
61.
Simpson, D. (1993). Nationalism, romanticism and the revolt against theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Stychin, C. (2001). Civil solidarity or fragmented identities? The politics of sexuality and citizenship in France. Social & Legal Studies, 10, 347-375.
63.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
64.
Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14, 1-19.
65.
Taylor, J. (1992). The public fetus and the family car: From abortion politics to a Volvo advertisement. Public Culture, 4, 67-80.
66.
Taylor Nelson SofresFrance. (2002). Institut d’études de marché et d’opinion international. Retrieved November 18, 2003, from http://www.sofres.com/archives_soc.htm
67.
Testing the abortion pill. (1992, July 18). Boston Globe, p. 16-16.
68.
Venner, F. (1995). Opposition a l’avortement: Du lobby a commando. Paris: Berg International Éditeurs.
69.
Verdaguer, P. (1996). La France vue par l’Amérique: Considérations sur la pérennité des stéréotypes. Contemporary French Civilization, 20, 240-277.
70.
Verdaguer, P. (2003). A turn-of-the-century honeymoon? The Washington Post’s coverage of France. French Politics, Culture & Society, 21, 50-63.
71.
Yadgar, Y. (2002). From the particularistic to the universalistic: National narratives in Israel’s mainstream press, 1967-97. Nations & Nationalism, 8, 55-72.
72.
Zitner, A. (1997, November 23). The saga of RU-486. Boston Globe Online. Retrieved November 18, 2003, from http://boston.com/globe/magazine/11-23/ru486
