As an exercise in consubstantial rivalry (a notion adapted from Kenneth Burke), democratic dissent operates tactically to turn the tables on the powerful in a given cultural field of political tension (a perspective drawn from Michel de Certeau). Dissent rearticulates political relationships by an ongoing act of rhetorical critique inside an established framework of understanding. The dissenter is a rhetorical trickster deploying metaphor as a principal heuristic of critique. The possibility of credible dissent relies on achieving a certain productive tension between affirming and disconcerting the political order—a double gesture of nonconforming solidarity—as can be illustrated in recent documentaries of dissent such as Uncovered: The War on Iraq.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Bleiker, R. (2000). Popular dissent, human agency and global politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Burke, K. (1965). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1954)
4.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1945)
5.
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1950)
6.
Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
9.
Byrd, R. (2004). Losing America: Confronting a reckless and arrogant presidency. New York: Norton.
10.
Cinema Libre Studio. (2004). About the film [Press Release]. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from www.truthuncovered.com/
11.
Dahl, R. (2001). How democratic is the American constitution?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Giroux, H. (2003). The abandoned generation: Democracy beyond the culture of fear. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
Greenwald, R. (2004, July). The director’s introduction. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from www.truthuncovered.com/
15.
Hanson, R. (1985). The democratic imagination in America: Conversations with our past. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
reprinted in Herald-Times (Bloomington, IN), p. C7.
17.
Ivie, R. (2001). Productive criticism then and now. American Communication Journal, 4. Available at www.acjournal.org/
18.
Ivie, R. (2002). Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5, 277-285.
19.
Ivie, R. (2004). Prologue to democratic dissent in America. Javnost/The Public, 11, 19-35.
20.
Ivie, R. (2005). Democracy and America’s war on terror. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
21.
Kaufman, A. (2004, 11 May). Docs populi: Raging against the Republican machine. Village Voice. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from www.truthuncovered.com/villagevoice.html
22.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe. C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
23.
McChesney, R. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.
25.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
26.
Oppenheimer, J. (2004, May 20). Uncovered: The war on Iraq. ScreenDaily.com, 20. Retrieved August 31, 2004, from www.truthuncovered.com/press_reviewsSDN.html
27.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
28.
Schaeffer, J. (1990). Sensus communis: Vico, rhetoric, and the limits of relativism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
Shiffrin, S. (1990). The First Amendment, democracy, and romance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Shiffrin, S. (1999). Dissent, injustice, and the meanings of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Sunstein, C. (2003). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Terrill, R. (2004). Malcolm X: Invention radical judgment. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
33.
Uncovered: The war on Iraq [Transcript]. (2004). Retrieved August 31, 2004, from www.Truthuncovered.com/images/UNCOVEREDtranscript.pdf, 1-3.
34.
Walzer, M. (1987). Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
