This article provides a comparison of the politics of representation through the performance of hysteria and madness in Luce Irigaray's collection of essays, This Sex Which Is Not One, and Kathy Acker's novel, Don Quixote: Which Was a Dream. Through close readings of Irigaray's and Acker's texts, the article explores how these critical, feminist projects question the mechanisms and effects of a dominant tradition in which they participate at the same time. These readings argue against a widespread feminist position which claims that the use of “the madwoman” restricts feminist theory either to silence or to a powerless, delirious, speaking position. Rather, this article shows that the figure does not exclusively symbolize the restrictions of feminist theory through dominant discourses but that it aids postmodern authors such as Irigaray and Acker in the creation of an excessive politics of enunciation, which destabilizes and reconfigures the conditions of representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, K. (1986). Don Quixote: Which was a dream. London: Paladin.
2.
Acker, K. (1991). Hannibal Lecter, my father. New York: Semiotext(e).
3.
Acker, K. (1997). Bodies of work. London: Serpent's Tail.
4.
Baym, N. (1984). The madwoman and her languages: Why I don't do feminist theory. Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature, 3(1-2), 45-59.
5.
Berg, M. (1991). Luce Irigaray's “contradictions”: Postmodernism and feminism. Signs, 17(1), 50-70.
6.
Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
Burke, C. (1989). Introduction to Luce Irigaray's “When our lips speak together.” Signs, 6 1, 66-68.
8.
Butler, J. (1994). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.
9.
Caminero-Santangelo, M. (1998). The madwoman can't speak, or why insanity is not subversive. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Chesler, P. (1977). Women and madness. New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published in 1972)
11.
Chisholm, D. (1994). Irigaray's hysteria. In C. Burke, N. Schor, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and European feminist thought (pp. 263-284). New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Cixous, H. (1983). Portrait of Dora. Diacritics, 13(1), 2-32.
13.
Cixous, H., & Clément, C. (1986). The newly-born woman (B. Wing, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
de Lauretis, T. (1984). Alice doesn't: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
de Sade, Marquis. (1965). The complete Justine, philosophy in the bedroom and other writings (R. Seaver & A. Wainhouse, Trans.). New York: Grove. (Original work published 1797)
17.
Deuber-Mankowsky, A. (1998). Geschlecht und Repräsentation. Oder, wie das Bild zum Denken kommt [Gender and representation]. Die Philosophin: Forum für feministische Theorie und Philosophie, 18, 24-41.
18.
Dix, D. S. (1989). Kathy Acker's Don Quixote: Nomad writing. Review of Contemporary Fiction, 9(3), 56-62.
19.
Elam, D. (1992). Romancing the postmodern. London: Routledge.
20.
Felman, S. (1993). Omen and madness: The critical phallacy. In What Does a Woman Want? Reading and Sexual Difference (pp. 20-40). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published in 1975)
21.
Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-177 (C. Gordon et al., Trans.; pp. 78-108). New York: Pantheon.
22.
Friedman, E. G. (1989). “Now eat your mind:” An introduction to the works of Kathy Acker. Review of Contemporary Fiction, 9(3), 37-49.
23.
Fuss, D. (1990). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature, and difference. London: Routledge.
24.
Gallop, J. (1983). Quand nos lèvres s'écrivent: Irigaray's body politic. Romanic Review, 74(1), 77-83.
25.
Gersdorf, C. (1998). Postmoderne aventiure: Don Quijote in Amerika [Postmodern adventure: Don Quixote in America]. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2(2), 142-156.
26.
Gilbert, S., & Gubar, S. (1979). The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Gilman, C. P. (1981). The yellow wallpaper. London: Virago. (Original work published 1892)
28.
Gilman, S. (1985). Difference and pathology: Stereotypes of sexuality, race, and madness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Grosz, E. (1989). Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
30.
Haraway, D. (1992). Ecce Homo, Ain't (Ar'n't) I a woman, and inappropriate/d Others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.
31.
Harper, G. A. (1987). The subversive power of sexual difference in the work of Kathy Acker. (Sub)Stance, 16, 44-56.
32.
Hulley, K. (1989). Transgressing genre: Kathy Acker's intertext. In P. O'Donnell & R. C. Davis (Eds.), Intertextuality and contemporary American fiction (pp. 171-191). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
Irigaray, L. (1985a). Speculum of the other woman (G. C. Gill., Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
Irigaray, L. (1985b). This sex which is not one (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Irigaray, L. (1985c). This sex which is not one. This sex which is not one (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans., pp. 23-33). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Jacobus, M. (1986). Reading woman: Essays in feminist criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Kahane, C. (1995). Passions of the voice: Hysteria, narrative, and the figure of the speaking woman. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
Kaup, M. (1993). Mad intertextuality: Madness in twentieth-century women's writing. Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
39.
Lacan, J. (1977). The agency of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud. Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans., pp. 146-178). New York: Norton.
40.
Lessing, Doris. (1973). The golden notebook. New York: Bantam. (Original work published 1962)
41.
Lotringer, S. (1991). Devoured by myths. In K. Acker, Hannibal Lecter, my father.New York: Semiotext(e), 1-24.
42.
McCaffery, L. (1991). An interview with Kathy Acker. Mississippi Review, 20(1-2), 83-97.
43.
McCaffery, L. (1996). The path of abjection: An interview with Kathy Acker. In Some other frequency: Interviews with innovative American Authors (pp. 14-35). Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
44.
Mitchell, J. (1984). Women—The longest revolution: Essays on feminism, literature and psychoanalysis. London: Virago.
45.
Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/Textual politics. London: Methuen.
46.
Montefiore, J. (1987). Feminism and poetry: Language, experience, identity in women's writing. London: Pandora.
47.
Moran, J. (2000). Star authors: Literary celebrity in America. London: Pluto.
48.
Nichol, K. (2001, February). Literate bodies: Theory and gender in Kathy Acker's Don Quixote. Paper presented at the First International Conference of the Society of American Women Writers, San Antonio, TX.
49.
Patton, C. (1984). Post-punk feminism. Women's Review of Books, 1(7), 11-12.
50.
Pitchford, N. (2000). Flogging a dead language: Identity politics, sex, and the freak reader in Acker's Don Quixote. Postmodern Culture, 11(1). Retrieved July 2001, from //muse.jhu.edu/journals/pmc/v011/11.1pitchford.html
51.
Plath, S. (1971). The bell jar. New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1963)
52.
Plaza, M. (1978). “Phallomorphic” power and the psychology of “Woman.” Ideology and Consciousness, 3, 5-36.
53.
Rose, J. (1994). On the “universality of madness”: Bessie Head's A question of power. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 401-417.
54.
Schor, N. (1994a). Previous engagements: The reception of Irigaray. In C. Burke, N. Schor, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and European feminist thought (pp. 3-14). New York: Columbia University Press.
55.
Schor, N. (1994b). This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. In C. Burke, N. Schor, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and European feminist thought (pp. 57-77). New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Schor, N. (1995). French feminism is a universalism. Differences, 7(1), 15-47.
57.
Sciollio, M. (1990). Kathy Acker and the postmodern subject of feminism. College English, 52(4), 437-445.
58.
Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Tomes, N. (1994). Feminist histories of psychiatry. In M. Micale & R. Porter (Eds.), Discovering the history of psychiatry (pp. 348-383). Hempel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
60.
Walsh, R. (1995). Novel arguments: Reading innovative American fiction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Weed, E. (1994). The question of style. In C. Burke, N. Schor, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and European feminist thought (pp. 79-110). New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
Yaeger, P. (1988). Honey-mad women: Emancipatory strategies in women's writing.New York: Columbia University Press.
