Anthony Giddens argues that theoretical analysis in sociology can demonstrate why lay agents can have only “partial” and “confined” understandings of the larger structures in which they are embedded. His notion of double hermeneutic rests on the assumption that such partial and imprecise knowledge shared by the social agents can be corrected through the injection of the sociological knowledge “from without.” In this article, by juxtaposing and comparing Giddens’s externalist approach to the change of language game—his double hermeneutic—with what the author would call the internalist approach, the author will show why Giddens’s theory of double hermeneutic fails to do what it professes to do.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnes, B. (1991). The nature of power. London: Macmillan .
2.
Bauman, Z. (1978). Hermeneutics and social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press .
3.
Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press .
4.
Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein. Rules and institutions. London: Routledge Kegan Paul .
5.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
6.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
7.
Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-326 .
8.
Giddens, A. (1977). Functionalism: Apres la lutte. In A. Giddens, Studies in social and political theory (pp. 96-129). New York: Basic Books .
9.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press .
10.
Giddens, A. (1987a). Nine theses on the future of sociology. In A. Giddens, Social theory and modern sociology (pp. 22-51). Cambridge, UK: Polity .
11.
Giddens, A. (1987b). What do sociologists do? In A. Giddens, Social theory and modern sociology (pp. 1-21). Cambridge, UK: Polity .
12.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
13.
Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books .
14.
Mannheim, K. (1984). Ideology and utopia (L. Wirth & E. Shils, Trans.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich . (Original work published 1936)
15.
Marcus, G. E. (1986). Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system. In J. Clifford & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 165-193). Berkeley: University of California Press .
16.
Merton, R. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action . American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904 .
17.
Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press .
18.
O’Neill, J. (1995). The poverty of postmodernism. London: Routledge Kegan Paul .
19.
Sharrock, W.,& Button, G. (1991). The social actor: Social action in real time. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 137-175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
20.
Stinchcombe, A. (1990). Milieu and social structure updated: A critique of the theory of structuration. In J. Clark, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and controversy (pp. 47-56). London: Falmer .
21.
Taylor, C. (1985). Social theory as practice. In C. Taylor, Philosophy and the human sciences (pp. 91-115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
22.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House .
