This research examines the role of the personal contacting activities of the political parties as mobilizing forces in what Verba and Nie termed campaign activities. A reformulated rational choice model is discussed in which parties seek to reduce certain avoidable and unavoidable costs associated with political participation. Using data from the 1952 through 1994 American National Election Studies, it is shown that the party contact has been and continues to be a major factor in mobilizing campaign activists. Its influence is remarkably robust, maintaining statistical and substantive significance even after controlling for other important factors usually associated with political behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, P. R.
, Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (1995). Change and continuity in the 1992 elections (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
2.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246-278.
3.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Barry, B.
(1970). Sociologists, economists, and democracy. London: Collier-MacMillan.
5.
Barzel, Y.
(1989). Economic analysis of property rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Berelson, B. R.
, Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Caldeira, G. A.
, Patterson, S. C., & Markko, G. A. (1985). The mobilization of voters in congressional elections. Journal of Politics, 47, 490-509.
8.
Carmines, E. G.
, & Kuklinski, J. H. (1990). Incentives, opportunities, and the logic of public opinion in American political representation. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 240-268). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
9.
Carton, P.
(1984). Mobilizing the Black community: The effects of personal contact campaigning on Black voters. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political Studies.
10.
Coase, R. H.
(1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
11.
Coleman, J. J.
(1996). Party organizational strength and public support for parties. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 805-824.
12.
Conway, M. M.
(1991). Political participation in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
13.
Crotty, W. J.
(1971). Party effort and its impact on the vote. American Political Science Review, 65, 439-450.
14.
Downs, A.
(1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Eldersveld, S. J.
(1956). Experimental propaganda techniques and voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 50, 154-165.
16.
Eldersveld, S. J.
(1982). Political parties in American society. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Eldersveld, S. J.
, & Dodge, R. W. (1954). Personal contact or mail propaganda: An experiment in voting turnout and attitude change. In D. Katz, D. Cartwright, S. Eldersveld, & A. M. Lee (Eds.), Public opinion and propaganda: A book of readings (pp. 532-542). New York: Dryden.
18.
Ferejohn, J. A.
(1990). Information and the electoral process. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 1-19). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
19.
Flanigan, W. H.
, & Zingale, N. H. (1994). Political behavior of the American electorate. (8th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarerly.
20.
Frendreis, J.
, Gitelson, A., Flemming, G., & Layzell, A. (1996). Local political parties and legislative races in 1992 and 1994. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties (2nd ed., pp. 149-162). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
Gibson, J. L.
, Cotter, C. P., Bibby, J. F., & Huckshorn, R. J. (1983). Assessing party organizational strength. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 192-222.
22.
Gibson, J. L.
, Cotter, C. P., Bibby, J. F., & Huckshorn, R. J. (1985). Whither the local parties? A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the strength of party organizations. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 139-160.
23.
Gibson, J. L.
, Frendreis, J. P., & Vertz, L. L. (1989). Party dynamics in the 1980s: Change in county party organizational strength, 1980-1984. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 69-90.
24.
Golden, C. M.
(1996). The campaign manager: Running and winning local elections. Ashland, OR: Oak Street Press.
25.
Grafstein, R.
(1991). An evidential decision theory of turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 989-1010.
26.
Herrnson, P. S.
(1986). Do parties make a difference? The role of party organizations in congressional elections. Journal of Politics, 48, 589-615.
27.
Hill, K. Q.
, & Leighley, J. E. (1993). Party ideology, organization, and competitiveness as mobilizing forces in gubernatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1158-1178.
28.
Huckfeldt, R.
, & Sprague, J. (1992). Political parties and electoral mobilization: Political structure, social structure and the party canvass. American Political Science Review, 86, 70-86.
29.
Iyengar, S.
(1990). Shortcuts to political knowledge: The role of selective attention and accessibility. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 160-185). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
30.
Iyengar, S.
, & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Katz, D.
, & Eldersveld, S. J. (1961). The impact of local party activities upon the electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 1-24.
32.
Kayden, X.
, & Mahe, E. (1985). The party goes on: The persistence of the two-party system in the United States. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Kramer, G. H.
(1970). The effects of precinct-level canvassing on voter behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 560-572.
34.
Krassa, M. A.
(1988). Context and the canvass: The mechanisms of interaction. Political Behavior, 10, 233-246.
35.
Krassa, M. A.
(1989). Getting out the Black vote: The party canvass and the black response. National Political Science Review, 1, 58-75.
36.
Lupfer, M.
, & Price, D. E. (1972). On the merits of face-to-face campaigning. Social Science Quarterly, 53, 534-543.
Niemi, R. G.
, & Weisberg, H. F. (Eds.). (1993). Controversies in voting behavior (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
39.
North, D. C.
(1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Oliver, J. E.
(1996). The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 498-513.
41.
Olson, M.
(1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Partin, R. W.
, Weber, L. M., Rapoport, R. B., & Stone, W. J. (1996). Perot activists in 1992-1994: Sources of activism. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties (2nd ed., pp. 217-238). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
Price, D. E.
, & Lupfer, M. (1973). Volunteers for Gore: The impact of a precinct-level canvass in three Tennessee cities. Journal of Politics, 35, 410-438.
44.
Riker, W. H.
, & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25-42.
45.
Rosenstone, S. J.
, & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.
46.
Rosenstone, S. J.
, & Wolfinger, R. E. (1978). The effect of voter registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 72, 22-45.
47.
Schlesinger, J. A.
(1985). The new American party. American Political Science Review, 79, 1152-1169.
48.
Sorauf, F. J.
(1967). Political parties and political analysis. In W. N. Chambers & W. D. Burnham (Eds.), The American party system: Stages of political development (pp. 33-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Sorauf, F. J.
, & Beck, P. A. (1988). Party politics in America (6th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
50.
Stigler, G. J.
(1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213-225.
51.
Teixeira, R. A.
(1992). The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
52.
Verba, S.
, & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Verba, S.
, Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Verba, S.
, Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say?American Political Science Review, 87, 303-318.
55.
Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (1970).
56.
Wattenberg, M. P.
(1996). The decline of American political parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Whiteley, P. F.
, & Seyd, P. (1994). Local party campaigning and electoral mobilization in Britain. Journal of Politics, 56, 242-252.
58.
Wielhouwer, P. W.
(1995). Strategic canvassing by the political parties, 1952-90. American Review of Politics, 16, 213-238.
59.
Wielhouwer, P. W.
, & Lockerbie, B. (1994). Party contacting and political participation, 1952-90. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 211-219.
60.
Williamson, O. E.
(1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
61.
Wolfinger, R. E.
, & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
Zipp, J. F.
, & Smith, J. (1979). The structure of electoral political participation. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 167-177.
