This article uses surveys of the parties' national convention delegates from 1972 to 1992 to examine the emergence of a religious cleavage between Republican and Democratic activists. The findings indicate that the religious cleavage between the two parties has grown over time, with the Republicans becoming more traditionally religious and with the Democrats growing more secular and religiously modern. This religious polarization has been associated with a growing partisan polarization on “cultural” issues such as abortion, women's rights, and homosexual rights. Finally, the article demonstrates that the impact of religious change within the parties on interparty differences on cultural issues has been even broader than a model focusing only on religious replacement would predict. Not only is religious replacement within the parties occurring, but within religious groups, Democratic activists are becoming more culturally liberal relative to Republican activists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. D.
(1997). Abortion: Evidence of issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 718-737.
2.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1983a). A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review, 77, 974-990.
3.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1983b). A spatial model with party activists: Implications for electoral dynamics. Public Choice, 41, 63-100.
4.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Beck, N.
, & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 89, 634-647.
6.
Berelson, B. R.
, Lazarsfeld, P. R., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Black, E.
, & Black, M. (1987). Politics and society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Brams, S. J.
(1978). The presidential election game. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Carmines, E. G.
(1991). The logic of party alignments. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3, 65-80.
10.
Carmines, E. G.
, & Layman, G. C. (1997). Issue evolution in postwar American politics: Old certainties and fresh tensions. In B. E. Shafer (Ed.), Present discontents: American politics in the very late twentieth century (pp. 90-134). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
11.
Carmines, E. G.
, & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Carsey, T. M.
, & Layman, G. C. (In press). A dynamic model of political change among party activists. Political Behavior.
13.
Chappell, H. W., Jr.
, & Keech, W. R. (1986). Policy motivation and party differences in a dynamic spatial model of party competition. American Political Science Review, 80, 881-900.
14.
Cook, E.
, Jelen, T., & Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: American public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Greenwood.
15.
Dionne, E. J., Jr.
(1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Touchstone.
16.
Downs, A.
(1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
17.
Green, J. C.
, Guth, J. L., & Fraser, C. R. (1991). Apostles and apostates? Religion and politics among party activists. In J. L. Guth & J. C. Green (Eds.), The Bible and the ballot box: Religion and politics in the 1988 election (pp. 113-138). Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Green, J. C.
, Guth, J. L., Smidt, C. E., & Kellstedt, L. A. (1996). Religion and the culture wars: Dispatches from the front. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
19.
Guth, J. L.
, & Green, J. C. (1993). Salience: The core concept? In D. C. Leege & L. A. Kellstedt (Eds.), Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics (pp. 157-176). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
20.
Guth, J. L.
, Smidt, C. E., Kellstedt, L. A., & Green, J. C. (1993). The sources of antiabortion attitudes: The case of religious political activists. American Politics Quarterly, 21, 65-80.
21.
Hadley, C. D.
, & Stanley, H. W. (1996). The Southern Super Tuesday: Southern Democrats seeking relief from rising Republicanism. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 158-189). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
22.
Herrera, R.
(1992). The understanding of ideological labels by political elites: A research note. Western Political Quarterly, 45, 1021-1035.
23.
Hertzke, A. D.
(1993). Echoes of discontent: Jesse Jackson, Pat Robertson, and the resurgence of populism. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
24.
Huber, P. J.
(1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 221-233.
25.
Hunter, J. D.
(1983). American Evangelicalism: Conservative religion and the quandary of modernity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
Hunter, J. D.
(1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Hunter, J. D.
(1994). Before the shooting begins: Searching for democracy in America's culture war. New York: Macmillan.
28.
Jelen, T.
(1991). The political mobilization of religious beliefs. New York: Praeger.
29.
Kellstedt, L. A.
, & Green, J. C. (1993). Knowing God's many people: Denominational preference and political behavior. In D. C. Leege & L. A. Kellstedt (Eds.), Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics (pp. 53-71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
30.
Kellstedt, L. A.
, Green, J. C., Guth, J. L., & Smidt, C. E. (1994). Religious voting blocs in the 1992 election: The year of the evangelical?Sociology Review, 55, 307-326.
31.
Layman, G. C.
(1997). Religion and political behavior in the United States: The impact of beliefs, affiliations, and commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 288-316.
32.
Layman, G. C.
, & Carsey, T. M. (1998). Why do party activists convert? An analysis of individual-level change on the abortion issue. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 723-749.
33.
Layman, G. C.
, & Green, J. C. (1998, April). The changing religious voter: The political impact of belonging, believing, and behaving in the 1960s and 1990s. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
34.
Leege, J. S.
(1983). The determinants of attitudes toward abortion in the American electorate. Western Political Quarterly, 36, 479-490.
35.
Miller, A. H.
, & Wattenberg, M. P. (1984). Politics from the pulpit: Religiosity and the 1980 elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 301-317.
36.
Miller, W. E.
, & Jennings, M. K. (1986). Parties in transition: A longitudinal study of party elites and party supporters. New York: Russell Sage.
37.
Miller, W. E.
, & Shanks, J. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Oldfield, D. M.
(1996). The right and the righteous: The Christian Right confronts the Republican party. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
39.
Rozell, M. J.
, & Wilcox, C. (1995). God at the grass roots: The Christian Right in the 1994 elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
40.
Stimson, J. A.
(1985). Regression in space and time: A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 914-947.
41.
Wald, K. D.
, Owen, D. E., & Hill, S. S., Jr. (1988). Churches as political communities. American Political Science Review, 82, 531-548.
42.
White, H.
(1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
43.
Wilcox, C.
(1992). God's warriors. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
44.
Wills, G.
(1990). Under God: Religion and American politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45.
Wuthnow, R.
(1988). The restructuring of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Wuthnow, R.
(1989). The struggle for America's soul: Evangelicals, liberals, and secularism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
