This article is an attempt to merge two of the more significant developments in recent American politics: the failure of our system to undergo a partisan-based realignment and the advent of service-oriented party organizations. Whereas traditional explanations of the “missing realignment” center around the attitudes of voters and/or the activities of candidates, this article suggests the parties are to blame. That is, the goals and activities of contemporary party organizations often frustrate voter attachment to parties, as well as the development of coherent platforms. Critical realignments have become a thing of the past. Yet, we have moved into a new era characterized by aggressive, national organizations, which I dub the “base-less” party system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, J.
(1988, October 26). Political parties channel millions to “issue” attacks. The New York Times, pp. A1, A14.
2.
Aldrich, J. H.
(1999 [this issue]). Political parties in a critical era. American Politics Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32.
3.
Aldrich, J. H.
, & Niemi, R. G. (1996). The sixth American party system: Electoral change, 1952-1992. In S. C. Craig (Ed.), Broken contract: Changing relationships between Americans and their government (pp. 87-109). Boulder, CO: Westview.
4.
Ansolabehere, S.
, & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
5.
Arterton, C. F.
(1982). Political money and party strength. In J. L. Fleishman (Ed.), The future of American political parties: The challenge of governance (pp. 101-139). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Associated Press. (1996, October 4). Speaker puts House races first.
7.
Bachrach, P.
(1967). The theory of democratic elitism: A critique. Boston: Little, Brown.
8.
Beck, P. A.
(1999). The changing American party coalitions. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9.
Berelson, B. R.
, Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Berke, R. L.
(1998, September 2). Lewinsky issue inspires theme for GOP ads. The New York Times, p. A22.
11.
Berke, R.
(1998, October 27). Financial debate divides Democrats as elections near. The New York Times, pp. A1, A20.
12.
Bibby, J. F.
(1990). Party organization at the state level. In L. S. Maisel (Ed.), The parties respond: Changes in the American party system (pp. 21-40). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Blumenthal, S.
(1980). The permanent campaign: Inside the world of elite political operatives. Boston: Beacon.
14.
Burnham, W. D.
(1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American government. New York: Norton.
15.
Burnham, W. D.
(1989). The Reagan heritage. In G. Pomper (Ed.), The election of 1988 (pp. 1-32). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16.
Burnham, W. D.
(1991). Critical realignment: Dead or alive? In B. E. Shafer (Ed.), The end of realignment? Interpreting American electoral eras (pp. 101-140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
Burnham, W. D.
(1996). Critical realignment lives: The 1994 earthquake. In C. Campbell & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Clinton presidency: First appraisals (pp. 363-396). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
18.
Carmines, E. G.
, & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Collet, C.
, & Hansen, J. (1996). Minor parties and candidates in sub-presidential elections. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (2nd ed., pp. 239-255). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
20.
Colman, J. J.
(1996). The resurgence of party organization? A dissent from the new orthodoxy. In D. M. Shea & J. C. Green (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (pp. 370-384). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
21.
Corrado, A.
(1997). Financing the 1996 elections. In G. M. Pomper (Ed.), The election of 1996: Reports and interpretations (pp. 135-172). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
22.
Cotter, C. P.
, Gibson, J. L., Bibby, J. F., & Huckshorn, R. J. (1984). Party organizations in American politics. New York: Praeger.
23.
Dahl, R. A.
(1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Dionne, E. J.
(1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
25.
Dougherty, R.
, Ladd, E. C., Wilber, D., & Zayachkiwsky, L. (Eds.). (1997). America at the polls, 1996. Storrs, CN: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.
26.
Ferro, M. V.
(1996, March/April). Where's the party. The Humanist, p. 4.
27.
Frantzich, S. E.
(1989). Political parties in the technological age. New York: Longman.
28.
Herrnson, P. S.
(1988). Party campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Herrnson, P. S.
(1990). Reemergent national party organizations. In L. S. Maisel (Ed.), The parties respond: Changes in the American party system (pp. 41-66). Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Herrnson, P. S.
(1994). The revitalization of national party organizations. In L. S. Maisel (Ed.), The parties respond: Changes in the American party system (2nd ed., pp. 50-82). Boulder, CO: Westview.
31.
Herrnson, P. S.
(1998) Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
32.
Jackson, J. L.
, Clayton, N., & Green, J. C. (1999). Issue networks and party elites in 1996. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
33.
Jacobson, G. C.
(1987). The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-1982. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 126-141.
34.
Jensen, R.
(1969). American election analysis. In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), Politics and the social sciences (pp. 136-159). New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Kayden, X.
, & Mahe, E., Jr. (1985). The party goes on: The persistence of the two-party system. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Kolodny, R.
(1999). Moderate partisan in the 1990s: Withering away or digging in? In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
37.
Ladd, E. C.
(1991). Like waiting for Godot: The uselessness of `realignment' for understanding change in contemporary American politics. In B. E. Shafer (Ed.), The end of realignment? Interpreting American electoral eras (pp. 24-36). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
Ladd, E. C.
(1997). 1996 vote: The `no majority' realignment continues. Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1-28.
39.
Lappe, F. M.
(1989). Rediscovering America's values. New York: Ballantine.
40.
Lazarsfeld, P. F.
, Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
Lehmann, C.
(1997, May 12). In the end: Cynical and proud. The New York Times, p. 40.
42.
Mayhew, D. R.
(1991). Divided we govern: Party control, law making, and investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Miller, W. E.
, & Shanks, J. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Mitchell, A.
(1998, March 11). House G.O.P. content to make ripples. The New York Times, p. A14.
45.
Pomper, G. M.
(1999). Parliamentary government in the United States? In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties: The changing role of contemporary American parties (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
46.
Price, D.
(1984). Bringing back the parties. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
47.
Rhodes, T. L.
(1996) The year of the elephant—1994: Realignment and/or punctuated change?Southeastern Political Review, 24, 319-336.
48.
Schlesinger, J. A.
(1985). The new American political party. American Political Science Review, 79, 1152-1169.
49.
Shea, D. M.
(1995). Transforming democracy: Legislative campaign committees and political parties. Albany: State University of New York Press.
50.
Silbey, J. H.
(1991). Beyond realignment and realignment theory: American political eras, 1789-1989. In B. E. Shafer (Ed.), The end of realignment? Interpreting American electoral eras (pp. 3-23). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
51.
Sorauf, F. J.
(1992). Inside campaign finance: Myths and realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
Walker, J. L.
(1966). A critique of the elitist theory of democracy. American Political Science Review, 60, 285-295.
53.
Wattenberg, M. P.
(1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Wattenberg, M. P.
(1998). The decline of American political parties: 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
White, J. K.
, & Shea, D. M. (in press). Parties in the information age. New York: St. Martin's.
