Measuring the President's Professional Reputation

Abstract

Professional reputation, unlike other components of Neustadt's presidential power, has received little scholarly attention. The president's professional reputation is the assessment of his performance in office by the Washington community. According to Neustadt, president's professional reputation can be determined by reviewing judgments of his performance by those who collect, synthesize, and disseminate elite opinion. We measure professional reputation based on the length and valence of nearly 3,600 editorials and opinion-editorials in The New York Times from 1961 to 1992. We compare these measures to previous operationalizations of the concept and test for convergent and discriminant criterion validity. This method provides a valid operationalization of Neustadt's concept of professional reputation, thus allowing for its inclusion in more fully specified models of presidential power.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barger, H.M. (1984) Impossible presidency. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Bond, J. , & Fleisher, R. (1984). Presidential popularity and congressional voting . Western Political Quarterly, 37, 291-306.

Bond, J. , & Fleisher, R. (1990). The president in the legislative arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brace, P. , & Hinckley, B. (1992). Follow the leader. New York : Basic Books.

Campbell, D.T. (1963). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. J. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. Study II (pp. 94-172). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Campbell, D.T. , & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.

Cronin, T.E. (1980). State of the presidency (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

Crovitz, L.G. , & Rabkin, J.A. (1989). The fettered presidency. Washington, DC: AEI.

Edwards, G.C. III (1980). Presidential influence in Congress. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

10.

Edwards, G.C. III ( 1989). At the margins. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Fiorina, M. (1992). Divided government. New York : Macmillan.

12.

Gleiber, D.W. , & Shull, S.A. (1992). Presidential influence in the policymaking process . Western Political Quarterly, 45, 441-467.

13.

Graber, D.A. (1987). Framing election news broadcasts: News context and its impact on the 1984 presidential election. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 552-568.

14.

Grossman, M. , & Kumar, M. (1981). Portraying the president. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

15.

Kernell, S. (1986). Going public. Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly Press.

16.

Light, P.C. (1982). The president's agenda: Domestic policy choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

17.

Lockerbie, B. , & Borrelli, S.A. (1989). Getting inside the beltway . British Journal of Political Science, 19, 97-106.

18.

Mayhew, D.R. (1992). Divided we govern. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

19.

Neustadt, R.E. (1990). Presidential power and the modern presidents. New York: Free Press.

20.

Rivers, D. , & Rose, N.L. (1985). Passing the president's program: Public opinion and presidential influence in congress. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 183-196.

21.

Shull, S.A. , & Gleiber, D.W. (1995). Presidential cycles in civil rights policy making . Presidential Studies Quarterly, 25, 429-446.

22.

Tatalovich, R. , & Daynes, B. (1979). Towards a paradigm to explain presidential power . Presidential Studies Quarterly, 9, 428-440.

23.

Thomas, N.C. (1977). Studying the presidency: Where do we go from here ? Presidential Studies Quarterly, 7, 169-175.

24.

Zeidenstein, H. (1983). Varying relations between presidents, popularity and their legislative success. Presidential Studies Quarterly , 13, 530-550.