This study predicts state supreme court judges' votes on claims based on a right to privacy by estimating an integrated model that incorporates contextual, attitudinal, and legal variables, including U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Consistent with previous research on judicial decision making, the results suggest that judges' rulings are influenced by various extralegal factors, both individual and contextual. But politics do not entirely overwhelm the role of law. U.S. Supreme Court precedent—when it exists—substantially constrains judges' responses to privacy claims in the states.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkins, B.M., & Glick, H.R. (1974). Formal judicial recruitment and state supreme court decisions. American Politics Quarterly, 2, 427-429.
2.
Atkins, B.M., & Glick, H.R. (1976). Environmental and structural variables as determinants of issues in state courts of last resort. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 97-115.
3.
Batterson, D.E. (1993). A trend ephemeral? A durational look at the new judicial federalism. Emory Law Journal, 42, 209-252.
4.
Baum, L. (1989). State supreme courts: Activism and accountability . In C. E. VanHorn (Ed.), The state of the states. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5.
Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 (1977).
6.
Beatty, J.K. (1972). State court evasion of the United States Supreme Court mandates during the last decade of the Warren Court. Valparaiso University Law Review, 6, 260-285.
7.
Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974).
8.
Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979).
9.
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
10.
Brace, P., & Hall, M.G. (1990). Neo-institutionalism and dissent in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics, 52, 54-70.
11.
Brace, P., & Hall, M.G. (1993). Integrated models of judicial dissent. Journal of Politics, 55, 914-935.
12.
Canon, B.C. (1972). The impact of formal selection processes on the characteristics of judges—reconsidered. Law and Society Review, 6, 570-593.
13.
Canon, B.C. (1973). Reactions of state supreme courts to a U.S. Supreme Court civil liberties decision. Law and Society Review, 8, 109-134.
14.
Canon, B.C., & Jaros, D. (1970). External variables, institutional structure, and dissent on state supreme courts. Polity, 4, 185-200.
15.
Carp, R.A., & Rowland, C.K. (1983). Policymaking and politics in the federal district courts. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
16.
Chressanthis, G.A., Gilbert, K.S., & Grimes, P.W. (1991). Ideology, constituent interest, and senatorial voting: The case of abortion. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 588-600.
17.
Connecticut v. Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1976).
18.
Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health, 491 U.S. 110 (1990).
19.
Emmert, C.F. (1992). An integrated case-related model of judicial decision making: Explaining state supreme court decisions in judicial review cases . Journal of Politics, 54, 543-552.
20.
Emmert, C.F., & Traut, C.A. (1994). The California supreme court and the death penalty . American Politics Quarterly, 22, 41-61.
21.
Erikson, R.S., Wright, G.C., & McIver, J.P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Fino, S.P. (1987). The role of state supreme courts in the new judicial federalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood .
23.
Friedelbaum, S.H. (1988). Human rights in the states: New directions in constitutional policymaking. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Friesen, J. (1992). State constitutional law: Litigating individual rights, claims, and defenses. New York: Bender.
25.
George, T.E., & Epstein, L. (1992). On the nature of Supreme Court decision making . American Political Science Review, 86, 323-337.
26.
Glick, H.R. (1991). Policy making and state supreme courts. In J. B. Gates & C. A. Johnson (Eds.), The American courts. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
27.
Glick, H.R., & Pruet, G.W. Jr. (1986). Dissent in state supreme courts: Patterns and correlates of conflict. In S. Goldman & C. Lamb (Eds.), Judicial conflict and consensus: Behavioral studies of American appellate courts. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
28.
Goldman, S. (1975). Voting behavior in the United States courts of appeals revisited. American Political Science Review, 69, 491-506.
29.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
30.
Gryski, G.S., & Main, E.C. (1986). Social backgrounds as predictors of votes on state courts of last resort: The case of sex discrimination. Western Political Quarterly, 39, 528-537.
31.
Gryski, G.S., Main, E.C., & Dixon, W.J. (1986). Models of high court decision making in sex discrimination cases. Journal of Politics, 48, 143-155.
32.
Gruhl, J. (1980). The Supreme Court's impact on the law of libel, compliance by lower federal courts. Western Political Quarterly , 33, 502-519.
33.
Hall, M.G. (1992). Electoral politics and strategic voting in state supreme courts. Journal of Politics, 54, 427-446
34.
Hall, M.G., & Brace, P. (1989). Order in the courts: A neo-institutional approach to judicial consensus. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 391-407.
35.
Hall, M.G., & Brace, P. (1992). Toward an integrated model of judicial voting behavior. American Politics Quarterly, 20, 147-168.
36.
Hall, M.G., & Brace, P. (1996). Justices' responses to case facts: An interactive model. American Politics Quarterly, 24, 237-261.
37.
Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
38.
Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238 (1976).
39.
Legge, J.S. Jr. (1983). The determination of attitudes toward abortion in the American electorate. Western Political Quarterly, 36, 479-490.
40.
Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977).
41.
Nagel, S. (1961). Political party affiliation and judges' decisions . American Political Science Review, 55, 843-850.
42.
National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656 (1989).
43.
Pacelle, R.L.Jr. , & Baum, L. (1992). Supreme Court authority in the judiciary: A study of remands. American Politics Quarterly, 20, 169-191.
44.
Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).
45.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
46.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).
47.
Porter, M.C., & O'Neil, R.M. (1988). Personal autonomy and the limits of state authority . In S. H. Friedelbaum (Ed.), Human rights in the states: New directions in constitutional policymaking . Westport, CT: Greenwood.
48.
Pritchett, C.H. (1941). Divisions of opinions among justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1939-1941. Amencan Political Science Review , 35, 890-912.
49.
Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984).
50.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
51.
Romans, N.T. (1974). The role of state supreme courts in judicial policymaking—Escobedo, Miranda, and the use of judicial impact analysis. Western Political Quarterly, 27, 38-59.
52.
Rowland, C.K., & Carp, R.A. (1996). Politics and judgment in federal district courts . Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
53.
Rowland, C.K., Carp, R.A., & Stidham, R.A. (1984). Judges' policy choices and the value basis of judicial appointments: A comparison of support for criminal defendants among Nixon, Johnson, and Kennedy appointees to the federal district courts. Journal of Politics, 46, 886-902.
54.
Segal, J.A. (1984). Predicting Supreme Court decisions probabilistically: The search and seizure cases. American Political Science Review , 78, 891-900.
55.
Segal, J.A. (1986). Supreme court justices as human decision makers: An individual-level analysis of the search and seizure cases. Journal of Politics, 48, 938-955.
56.
Segal, J.A., & Cover, A.D. (1989). Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court justices. American Political Science Review, 83, 557-565.
57.
Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. (1993). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives, 489 U.S. 602 (1989).
59.
Songer, D.R. (1987). The impact of the Supreme Court on trends in economic policy making in the United States courts of appeals. Journal of Politics, 49, 830-841.
60.
Songer, D.R., & Davis, S. (1990). The impact of party and region on voting decisions in the United States courts of appeals, 1955-1986. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 317-334.
61.
Songer, D.R., & Haire, S. (1992). Integrating alternative approaches to the study of judicial voting: Obscenity cases in the U.S. courts of appeals. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 963-982.
62.
Songer, D.R., & Sheehan, R.S. (1990). Supreme court impact on compliance and outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States courts of appeals. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 297-316.
63.
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).
64.
Stumpf, H.P., & Culver, J.H. (1992). The politics of state courts. White Plains, NY: Longman.
65.
Tate, C.N. (1981). Personal attribute models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices: Liberalism in civil liberties and economics decisions, 1946-1978. American Political Science Review, 75, 355-367.
66.
Tate, C.N., & Handberg, R. (1991). Time binding and theory building in personal attribute models of Supreme Court voting behavior, 1916-1988. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 460-480.
67.
Tarr, G.A. (1977). Judicial impact and state supreme courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
68.
Tarr, G.A., & Porter, M.C. (1988). State supreme courts in state and nation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
Ulmer, S.S. (1973). Social background as an indicator to the votes of Supreme Court justices in criminal cases: 1947-1956 terms. American Journal of Political Science, 17, 622-628.
