Knowledge of Politics and Sense of Subjective Political Competence

Abstract

In this article I use pooled data from the 1988 and 1992 National Election Studies to explore the relationship between knowledge of politics and belief that one can understand the political universe. Although the 2 are related, the association is weaker than might be anticipated. Moreover, the meaning of the belief that one is sometimes confused by political affairs varies according to how well-informed citizens are. Among those who are largely ignorant of politics, admitting that public affairs are sometimes baffling seems to constitute a confession of political incapacity. For those who are well-informed, however, stating that one sometimes finds politics confusing is related to lack of trust in political leaders. Finally, among the well-informed, at least, believing that one sometimes cannot understand politics is related to lower rates of electoral participation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political attitudes in America: Formation and change. San Francisco : Freeman.

Abramson, Paul R , John H. Aldrich , and David W. Rohde. 1991. Change and continuity in the 1988 elections. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

—. 1995. Change and continuity in the 1992 elections. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Almond, Gabriel A. , and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.

Balch, George I. 1974. Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept "sense of political efficacy." Political Methodology 1 (2): 1-43.

Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1995. Comparing Americans' political information in 1988 and 1992. Journal of Politics 57:521-32.

Campbell, Angus , Gerald G. Gurin , and Warren E. Miller. 1954. The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

Converse, Philip E. 1972. Change in the American electorate. In The human meaning of social change, edited by Angus Campbell and Philip E. Converse. New York: Russell Sage.

—. 1990. Popular representation and the distribution of information . In Information and democratic processes, edited by John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski. Urbana: Umversity of Illinois Press.

10.

Craig, Stephen C. , Richard G. Niemi , and Glenn E. Silver. 1990. Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior 12:289-314.

11.

Lane, Robert E. 1965 Political life: Why and how people get involved in politics. Rev. ed. New York: Free Press.

12.

Leighley, Jan E. 1991. Participation as a stimulus of political conceptualization. Journal of Politics 53:198-211.

13.

Milbrath, Lester W. , and M. L. Goel. 1977. Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

14.

Miller, Warren E. , Arthur H. Miller , and Edward J. Schneider. 1980. American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952-1978 . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Morin, Richard. 1996. Tuned out, turned off: Millions of Americans know little about how their government works. The Washington Post National Weekly Edition. 5-11 February, pp 6-8.

16.

Niemi, Richard G. , Stephen C. Craig , and Franco Mattei. 1991. Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. American Political Science Review 85:1407-13.

17.

Renshon, Stanley Allen. 1974. Psychological needs and political behavior: A theory of personality and political efficacy. New York: Free Press.

18.

Thompson, Dennis F. 1970. The democratic citizen: Social science and democratic theory in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.