Scholars argue that the social structural basis of the party system in the United States developed during the New Deal era has weakened, resulting in an increasing tendency for ideology to shape partisan support. We test this proposition by examining the role of ideology in the formation of partisanship in the United States over the last two decades. We find that, over the last 20 years, ideology has played an increasing role in shaping partisanship, one that cuts across traditional New Deal social group cleavages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asher, Herbert B.1983. Voting behavior research in the 1980s: An examination of some old and new problem areas. In Political science: The state of the discipline, edited by Ada Finifter, 339-81. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
2.
Axelrod, Robert.1972. Where votes come from: An analysis of electoral coalitions, 1952-1968. American Political Science Review66:11-20.
3.
Carmines, Edward G., and Harold W. Stanley.1990. Ideological realignment in the contemporary South: Where have all the conservatives gone? In The disappearing South? Studies in regional change and continuity, edited by Robert P. Steed, Laurence W. Moreland, and Tod A. Baker, 21-33. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
4.
—. 1992. The transformation of the New Deal party system: Social groups, political ideology, and changing partisanship among northern Whites, 1972-1988. Political Behavior14:213-37.
5.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson.1989. Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
6.
Dalton, Russell J., and Martin P. Wattenberg.1993. The not so simple act of voting. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, edited by Ada W. Finifter, 193-218. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
7.
Franklin, Mark N.1985. The decline of class voting in Britain: Changes in the basis of electoral choice, 1964-1983. Oxford: Clarendon.
8.
Franklin, Mark N., Thomas T. Mackie, and Henry Valen, eds. 1992. Electoral change. New York : Cambridge University Press.
9.
Goldthorpe, John.1980. Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain . Oxford: Clarendon.
10.
Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, John Curtice, Geoff Evans, Julia Field, and Sharon Witherspoon .1991. Understanding political change: The British voter 1964-1987. Oxford: Pergamon.
11.
King, Gary.1986. How not to lie with statistics: Avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. American Journal of Political Science30:666-87.
12.
Mackie, Thomas T., and Mark N. Franklin.1987. Social structure and party alignments in Western countries. In The Blackwell encyclopedia of political institutions, edited by Vernon Bogdanor, 571-4. New York: Basil Blackwell.
13.
Miller, Arthur H., and Brad Lockerbie.1992. The United States of America. In Electoral Change, edited by Mark N. Franklin, Thomas T. Mackie, and Henry Valen, 362-80. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Miller, Arthur H., and Chnstopher Wlezien .1993. The social group dynamics of partisan evaluations. Electoral Studies12:5-22.
15.
Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg, eds. 1993. Controversies in voting behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
16.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Tetlock, eds. 1991. Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Stanley, Harold W., William T. Bianco, and Richard G. Niemi.1986. Partisanship and group support over time: A multivariate analysis. American Political Science Review80:969-76.
18.
Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi.1991. Partisanship and group support, 1952-1988. American Politics Quarterly19:189-210.
19.
—. 1995. The demise of the New Deal coalition partisanship and group support, 1952-92. In Democracy's feast: Elections in America, edited by Herb Weisberg, 220-40. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
20.
Stone, Walter J., Ronald B. Rapoport, and Alan I. Abramowitz.1990. Party polarization: The Reagan revolution and beyond. In The parties respond: Changes in American parties and campaigns, edited by L. Sandy Maisel, 69-99. Boulder, CO: Westview .
21.
van der Eijk, Cees, Mark N. Franklm, Thomas T. Mackie, and Henry Valen.1992. Cleavages, conflict resolution and democracy. In Electoral Change, ed. Mark N. Franklin , Thomas T. Mackie, and Henry Valen, 383-405. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Wattenberg, Martin T.1991. The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980's. Cambndge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Zuckerman, Alan S.1982. New approaches to political cleavage. Comparative Political Studies15:131-44.
