Presidential election forecasting models may miss the mark, sometimes grossly, as the 1992 contest demonstrated. The reason for this, we argue, is specification error. The models include irrelevant variables and exclude relevant ones. In particular, prospective voting variables have been ignored. When prospective economic and political evaluations are added, alongside traditional retrospective evaluations, forecasting quality improves sharply. These full-time forecasting models that tap voter onentations toward the future, as well as toward the past, promise long-run accuracy gains.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan L.1992An improved model for predicting presidential outcomes . PS: Political Science and Politics21:843-7
2.
Asher, H.B.1988. Presidential elections and American politics. Chicago: Dorsey.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel.1992. We should be modest. The Political Methodologist5:17.
4.
Brody, Richard, and Lee Sigelman.1983. Presidential popularity and presidential elections: An update and an extension. Public Opinion Quarterly47:325-8.
5.
Campbell, James E., and Thomas E. Mann.1992. Forecasting the 1992 presidential election . Brookings Review10 (Fall):22-7.
6.
Campbell, James E., and Kenneth A. Wink .1990. Tnal-heat forecasts of the presidential vote. American Politics Quarterly18:251-69.
7.
Clarke, Harold D., and Mananne C. Stewart .1994. Prospections, retrospections, and rationality: The "bankers"' model of presidential approval reconsidered . American Journal of Political Science38:1104-23.
8.
Conover, W.J.1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Erikson, Robert S.1989. Economic conditions and the presidential vote. American Political Science Review83:567-73.
10.
Erikson, Robert S., and Christopher Wlezien .1996. Of time and presidential election forecasts. PS: Political Science and Politics29:37-9.
11.
Fair, Ray C.1978. The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics60:159-72.
12.
Fionna, M.P.1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CTYale University Press.
13.
Fox, John.1991. Regression diagnostics. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 79. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Franklin, Charles, ed. 1992. The Political Methodologist5(2).
15.
Haynes, Stephen E., and Joe A. Stone.1994. Why did economic models falsely predict a Bush landslide in 1992? Contemporary Economic Policy12:123-30.
16.
Hibbs, Douglas A.1982. President Reagan's mandate from the 1980 elections: A shift to the nght? American Politics Quarterly10:387-420.
17.
Kiewiet, D.R.1983. Macroeconomics and micropolitics: The electoral effects of economic issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.1988. Economics and elections: The major Western democraciesAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
—. 1995. Comparaison de Prévision des Élections Présidentielles en France et aux États-Unis [Comparison of presidential forecasts in France and the United States]Journal de la Société de Statistique de Pans136(1):30-45.
20.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tom W. Rice.1984. Forecasting presidential elections: A companson of naive models. Political Behavior6:9-21.
21.
—. 1992a. 1992 presidential election forecasts. The Political Methodologist5(2):11-12.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Andrew Skalaban .1990. The R-squared: Some straight talk. Political Analysis2:153-72.
24.
Lockerbie, Brad.1992. Prospective voting in presidential elections, 1956-1988American Politics Quarterly20:308-25.
25.
MacKuen, Michael B., Robert Erikson, and James Stimson.1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review86:597-611.
26.
Magruder, Frank Abbott.1942. American government. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
27.
Miller, Arthur H., and Martin P. Wattenberg .1985. Throwing the rascals out: Policy and performance evaluations of presidential candidates, 1952-1980 . American Political Science Review79:359-72.
28.
Norpoth, Helmut.1995. Is Clinton doomed? An early forecast for 1996. PS: Political Science and Politics28.201-7.
29.
Pindyck, R.S., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld .1991. Econometric models & economic forecasts. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Rosenstone, S.J.1983. Forecasting presidential elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Theil, H.1966. Applied economic forecasting. Amsterdam : North Holland.
32.
Tufte, Edward R.1978. Political control of the economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Vaccara, B.N., and V. Zarnowitz.1977. How good are the leading indicators ? In 1977 proceedings of the business and economic statistics section, 41-50. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
