In this research, we seek to explain state-to-state variation in how harshly term limits treat incumbent state legislators. Harshness is measured by how quickly and how permanently state limits remove incumbents from the legislature. Overall, there is considerable support for the contention that political structure influences how harshly states treat their incumbents. Much of the variation in the harshness of term limits may reflect the idiosyncrasies of leaders or small groups in the various ad hoc organizations that have pushed for limits in the different states. However, the impact of at least one contextual variable is significant: Variation in turnover rate accounts for 33% of the variance in harshness. In comparing states that have adopted term limits, the lower the existing turnover rate in the legislature, the harsher the term limits they tend to adopt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan, David Lanoue, and Subba Ramesh.1988. Economic condition, causal attribution, and political evaluation in the 1984 presidential campaign. Journal of Politics50:848-63.
2.
Atkeson, Lonna, and Randall Partin.1995. Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review89:99-107.
3.
Berke, Richard.1994. Unseated by term limits—but it's musical chairs . The New York Times, February 17, 1994.
4.
Capell, Elizabeth.1994. The impact of term limits: Early returns from California . APSA Legislative Studies Section Newsletter: Extension of Remarks17(2):6-7, 9.
5.
Caress, Stanley.1994. The impact of term limits on state legislator behavior . Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association Meeting in Atlanta, GA, November.
6.
Clucas, Richard.1994The first post term limits election in California . APSA Legislative Studies Section Newsletter: Extension of Remarks17(2):4-5, 15.
7.
Copeland, Gary.1992Term limitations and political careers in Oklahoma: In, out, up, or down. In Limiting legislative terms, edited by Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin, 139-158. Washington, DCCongressional Quarterly Press.
8.
Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark.1994. Women, elections, and representation . 2d ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
Donovan, Todd.1993The social and political basis of support for legislative term limitation initiatives. Paper presented to the Western Political Science Association Meetings in Pasadena, CA, March .
10.
Donovan, Todd, and Joseph Snipp.1994. Support for legislative term limitations in California : Group representation, partisanship, and campaign information . Journal of Politics56:492-501.
11.
Everson, David.1992The impact of term limitations on the states: Cutting the underbrush or chopping down the tall timber? In Limiting legislative terms, edited by Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin, 189-204. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
Guerra, Fernando.1991. Term limits and minority representation in California . Paper presented at American Political Science Association Meetings in Washington, DC, August
13.
Hodson, Timothy.1994. Conventional wisdom or wishful thinking: Staff influence in post term limit legislatures APSA Legislative Studies SectionNewsletter: Extension of Remarks17(2).8-9, 15.
14.
Jacobson, Gary, and Samuel Kernell.1983. Strategy and choice in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Jewell, Malcolm.1994. State legislative elections: What we know and don't know . American Politics Quarterly22:483-509.
16.
Kurtz, Karl.1992. Limiting terms, what's in store? State Legislatures18:32-4.
17.
Moncrief, Gary, Joel A. Thompson, Michael Haddon, and Robert Hoyer.1992. For whom the bell tolls: Term limits and state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly17:37-47.
18.
Opheim, Cynthia.1994. The effect of U.S. state legislative term limits revisited Legislative Studies Quarterly19:49-60.
19.
Payne, James.1991. Limiting government by limiting congressional terms . Public Interest, Spring 106-17.
20.
Payne, James, and Michael Jerbich .1992. Curbing the governmental class: How term limits can restore a citizen legislature in Illinois. Study No. 51. Chicago: Heartland Institute .
21.
Price, Charles.1992. The guillotine comes to California: Term limits in the golden state In Limiting legislative terms, edited by Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin, 117-38Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
22.
Reed, Robert, and Eric Schansberg .1994. An analysis of the impact of congressional term limits. Economic Inquiry32:79-91.
23.
Rothenberg, Stuart.1992a. How term limits became a national phenomenon. State Legislatures18:35-9.
24.
—. 1992b. Transplanting term limits: Political mobilization and grass-roots politics. In Limiting legislative terms, edited by Gerald Benjamin and Michael Malbin, 97-114Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
25.
Squire, Peverill.1992. Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69-80.
26.
Sussman, Glen, Nicholas Lovrich, Byron Daynes, and Jonathan West1994a State legislators' attitudes toward term limits: A seven-state study. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Meetings in Albuquerque, NM, March.
27.
—. 1994b. Term limits and state legislatures. APSA Legislative Studies Section Newsletter: Extension of Remarks17(2):1-3, 16.
28.
Thompson, Joel, and Gary Moncrief.1993. The implications of term limits for women and minorities: Some evidence from the states. Social Science Quarterly74:300-9
