Length of Congressional Tenure and Federal Spending

Abstract

In this article we determine the nature of the relationship between congressional tenure and the distribution of federal outlays. A popular assumption is that this relationship is a strong one, with senior members of Congress obtaining a disproportionate share of federal dollars for their own constituents. In fact, the argument that senior members are able to perform this feat is suspected to be a factor in the defeat of a term limit initiative in Washington state in 1991. Term limits, it was argued at the time, would put the state of Washington at a disadvantage in the race for favorable federal treatment. Previous empirical research, however, has found little evidence that legislative tenure matters in the distribution of federal dollars, thus throwing into question the validity of popular assumptions about the importance of congressional tenure. By analyzing data at both the state and congressional district levels, we help to specify the conditions under which legislative experience does and does not lead to the acquisition of additional federal dollars.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez, R. Michael , and Jason Saving. 1994. Feeding at the trough: Committees and the political economy of federal outlays to congressional districts. Unpublished paper, California Institute of Technology, April.

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bickers, Ken , and Robert Stein. 1991. Federal domestic outlays, 1983-1990 . Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Davidson, Roger. 1992. The postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin's.

Deckard, Barbara. 1972. State party delegations in the U.S. House of Representatives . Journal of Politics 34:199-222.

Ehrenhalt, Alan. 1986. Media, power shifts dominate O'Neill's House. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 44:2131-8.

Elving, Ronald D. 1991a. National drive to limit terms casts shadow over Congress . Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 49:3101-5.

—. 1991b. Foley helps put the brakes on drive for term limits . Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 49:3261-3.

Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork barrel politics. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.

10.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Universalism, reciprocity, and distributive policymaking in majority rule institutions. In Research in public policy analysis and management, edited by John P. Crecine. Greenwich, CT: JAI .

11.

Greene, William. 1990. Econometric analysis New York : Macmillan.

12.

Heitshusen, Valerie. 1992. Do committee members get a bigger piece of the pie? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Chicago.

13.

Hibbing, John R. 1991. Congressional careers: Contours of life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

14.

Hird, John. 1991. The political economy of pork: Project selection at U.S. Corps of Army Engineers. American Political Science Review 85:429-56.

15.

Hook, Janet. 1993. Big delegation power: Just hang together. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 51:3418.

16.

Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's voting decisions. 3d ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

17.

Owens, John R. , and Larry L. Wade. 1984

Federal spending in congressional districts

Western Political Quarterly 37:404-23.

18.

Payne, James. 1991. The culture of spending. San Francisco : ICS.

19.

Ray, Bruce A. 1980. Congressional promotion of district interests. In Political Benefits, edited by Barry Rundquist. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

20.

—. 1982. Causation in the relationship between congressional position and federal spending. Polity 14:676-90.

21.

Reed, W. Robert , and D. Eric Schansberg . 1993. The relationship between congressional spending and tenure. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma.

22.

Rich, M.J. 1989. Distributive politics and the allocation of federal grants . American Political Science Review 83:193-213.

23.

Ritt, Leonard G. 1976. Committee position, seniority, and the distribution of government expenditures. Public Policy 24:469-97.

24.

Roberts, Brian E. 1990. A dead senator tells no lies: Seniority and the distribution of federal benefits. American Journal of Political Science 34:31-58.

25.

Rundquist, Barry S. , and John A. Ferejohn . 1975. Observations on a distributive theory of policymaking. In Comparative public policy, edited by Craig Liske , William Loehr , and John McCammant. New York: Wiley.

26.

Stein, Robert M. , and Kenneth N. Bickers . 1994. Congressional elections and the pork barrel. Journal of Politics 56:377-99

27.

Stubben, Jerry , and John R. Hibbing . 1987. The prestige of formal positions in the modem U.S. House of Representatives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago.

28.

Truman, David. 1956. The state delegations and the structure of party voting in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 50:1023-45.

29.

Wilson, Rick K. 1986. What was it worth to be on a committee in the U.S. House, 1889 to 1913? Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:47-63.