This article uses recent National Election Studies to assess what Americans know about ideology. Although Converse's study of mass belief systems made knowledge of ideological terms an indicator of ideological sophistication, scholars have tended to ignore what ordinary citizens know about ideology. Although only a small portion of the public is completely ignorant of ideology, most Americans do not know very much about it. Three factors—opportunity, motivation, and cognitive ability—affect what people know about the central continuum of U.S. politics. Widespread ignorance of ideology impedes citizens' ability to link their own ideological orientations to their votes for presidential candidates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achen, C.H.1975. Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review69:1218-31.
2.
Allen, M.J., and W.M. Yen.1979. Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3.
Bennett, S.E.1994a. Americans' knowledge of ideology in 1988 and 1992. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31-September 4, New York.
4.
—. 1994b. Changing levels of political information in 1988 and 1990. Political Behavior16:1-20.
5.
Bishop, G.F., A.J. Tuchfarber, and R.W. Oldendick.1978. Change in the structure of American political attitudes: The nagging question of question wording. American Journal of Political Science22:250-69.
6.
Bishop, G.F., A.J. Tuchfarber, R.W. Oldendick, and S.E. Bennett.1979. Questions about question wording: A reply to revisiting mass belief systems revisited. American Journal of Political Science23:187-92.
7.
Brunk, G.G.1978. The 1964 attitude consistency leap reconsidered. Political Methodology5:347-59.
8.
Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W.E. Miller, and D.E. Stokes.1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.
9.
Cassel, C.A.1984. Issues in measurement: The "Levels of Conceptualization" Index of Ideological Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science28:418-32.
10.
Converse, P.E.1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, edited by D. E. Apter.New York: Free Press .
11.
—. 1970. Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue . In The quantitative analysis of social problems, edited by E. R. Tufte.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
—. 1975. Public opinion and voting behavior. In Handbook ofpolitical science, edited by F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby. Vol. 4. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
—. 1990. Popular representation and the distribution of information . In Information and democratic processes, edited by J. A. Ferejohn and J. H. Kuklinski.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Converse, P.E., with R.G. Niemi.1971. Non-voting among young adults in the United States. In Political parties and political behavior , edited by W. J. Crotty, D. M. Freeman, and D. S. Gatlin.2d ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Delli Carpini, M.X., and S. Keeter.1993. Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science37:1179-1206.
16.
Erikson, R.S.1979. The SRC panel data and mass political attitudes. British Journal of Political Science9:89-114.
17.
Field, J.O., and R.E. Anderson.1969. Ideology in the public's conceptualization of the 1964 election. Public Opinion Quarterly33:380-98.
18.
Gant, M.M.1985. The irrelevance of abstract conceptualization for policy-based voting. Polity18:149-60.
19.
Hagner, P.R., and J.C. Pierce.1982. Correlative characteristics of levels of conceptualization in the American public: 1956-1976. Journal of Politics44:779-807.
20.
—. 1983. Levels of conceptualization and belief system consistency . Micropolitics2:311-48.
21.
Jacoby, W.G.1986. Levels of conceptualization and reliance on the liberal-conservative continuum. Journal of Politics48:423-32.
22.
—. 1988. The sources of liberal-conservative thinking: Education and conceptualization. Political Behavior10:316-32.
23.
Kinder, D.R.1983. Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In Political science: The state of the discipline, edited by A. W. Finifter.Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
24.
Klingemann, H.D.1979. Measuring ideological conceptualizations. In Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies, edited by S. H. Barnes, M. Kaase, et al. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Knight, K.1985. Ideology in the 1980 election: Ideological sophistication does matter. Journal of Politics47:828-53.
26.
—. 1990. Ideology and public opinion. In Research in micropolitics, edited by S. Long. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Lane, R.E.1973. Patterns of political belief. In Handbook of political psychology, edited by J. N. Knutson.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Luskin, R.C.1987. Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science31:856-99.
29.
—. 1990. Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior12:331-61.
30.
Luttbeg, N.R., and M.M. Gant.1985. The failure of liberal/conservative ideology as a cognitive structure. Public Opinion Quarterly49:80-93.
31.
Margolis, M.1977. From confusion to confusion: Issues and the American voter (1956-1972. American Political Science Review71:31-43.
32.
Neuman, W.R.1986. The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Nie, N.H., and K. Andersen.1974. Mass belief systems revisited: Political change and attitude structure. Journal of Politics36:541-91.
34.
Nie, N.H., and J.N. Rabjohn.1979a. Revisiting mass belief systems revisited . American Journal of Political Science23:139-75.
35.
—. 1979b. Response. American Journal of Political Science23:193.
36.
Nie, N.H., S. Verba, and J.R. Petrocik.1976. The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Petrocik, J.R.1978. Comment: Reconsidering the reconsiderations of the 1964 change in attitude consistency. Political Methodology5:361-68.
38.
Pierce, J.C., and P.R. Hagner.1982. Conceptualization and party identification: 1956-1976. American Journal of Political Science26:377-87.
39.
Pierce, J.C., and D.D. Rose.1974. Nonattitudes and American public opinion: The examination of a thesis. American Political Science Review68:626-49.
40.
Pomper, G.M.1972. From confusion to clarity: Issues and American voters, 1956-1968. American Political Science Review66:415-28.
41.
Quirk, P.J., and J.K. Dalager.1993. The election: A "new Democrat" and a new kind of presidential campaign. In The elections of 1992 , edited by M. Nelson.Washington, DC: C.Q. Press.
42.
Smith, E.R.A.N.1980. The levels of conceptualization: False measures of ideological sophistication. American Political Science Review74:685-96.
43.
—. 1989. The unchanging American voter. Berkeley : University of California Press.
44.
Smith, T.W.1989. Random probes of GSS questions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research1:305-25.
45.
Sniderman, P.M.1993. The new look in public opinion research. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, edited by A. W. Finifter.Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
46.
Sullivan, J.L., J.E. Piereson, and G.E. Marcus.1978. Ideological constraint in the mass public: A methodological critique and some new findings. American Journal of Political Science22:233-49.
47.
Sullivan, J.L., J.E. Piereson, G.E. Marcus, and S. Feldman.1979. The more things change, the more they stay the same: The stability of mass belief systems. American Journal of Political Science23:176-86.
48.
Wyckoff, M.L.1987. Issues of measuring ideological sophistication. Political Behavior9:193-224.
49.
Zaller, J.1992. The nature and origins of public opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Zeller, R.A., and E.G. Carmines.1980. Measurement in the social sciences: The link between theory and data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
