Despite the growing importance of political parties as campaign service providers and as organizational forces in the U.S. House, few have explored the linkages between party campaign activities in House elections and partisan behavior within the House. In this article, we explore the possibility that financial contributions by party committees during the election cycle might motivate House members to support the party line more often after the election. Examining data on all Democrats and Republicans successfully reelected to the House during the 1980s, we find evidence that those who received larger shares of their campaign receipts from party sources showed greater-than-expected levels of party unity during the session of Congress immediately following the election.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asher, Herbert, and Herbert Weisberg .1978. Voting change in Congress: Some dynamic perspectives on an evolutionary process. American Journal of Political Science22:391-425.
2.
Baker, Ross1985. Party and institutional sanctions in the U.S. House: The case of Congressman GrammLegislative Studies Quarterly10:315-38.
3.
Barone, Michael, Grant Ujifusa , and Douglas Matthews, eds. 1977. Almanac of American politics 1978. New York: E. P. Dutton.
4.
Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, eds. 1981. Almanac ofAmerican politics 1982. Washington, DC: Barone.
5.
—, eds. 1983, 1985, 1987, 1989. Almanac of American politics 1982. Washington, DC: National Journal
6.
Bartels, Larry.1991. Instrumental and quasi-instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science35:777-801.
Bound, John, David Jaeger, and Regina Baker.1993. The cure can be worse than the disease: A cautionary tale regarding instrumental variables (NBER Technical Working Paper no. 137) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9.
Brandes Crook, Sara, and John Hibbing.1985. Congressional reform and party discipline: Effects of changes in the seniority system on party loyalty in the U.S. House of Representatives. British Journal of Political Science15:207-26.
10.
Congressional Quarterly1980-1990. Congressional quarterly almanac for years 1979-1989Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
11.
Davis, Frank.1993. Balancing the perspective on PAC contributions: In search of an impact on roll calls. American Politics Quarterly21:205-22.
12.
Dwyre, Diana.1993. The complete congressional party—Governing and electing: The congressional campaign committees and responsible party government during realignmentsPaper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
13.
—. 1994. The congressional campaign committees and Congress ... and the electorate: Can the potential for party influence be realized? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
14.
Edwards, George.1989. At the margins. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
15.
Evans, Sean.1994. Changing norms and rising partisanship of freshman members of the House of Representatives. Master's thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Alabama.
16.
Federal Election Commission.1981, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1989. FEC reports on financial activity, 1979-1980, 1981-1982, 1983-1984, 1985-1986, 1987-1988 (Final reports): U.S. Senate and House campaigns. Washington, DC: Federal Election Commission.
17.
Fenno, Richard.1990. The emergence of a senate leader: Pete Domenici and the Reagan budget. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
18.
Fiorina, Morris.1974. Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies . Duxbury, MA: Lexington Books .
19.
—. 1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Franzitch, Stephen.1991. He who pays the paper: Party campaign contributions and party line voting in Congress. Paper presented at the Conference on Grassroots Politics and Party Organizations, Ray Bliss Institute, University of Akron, Ohio.
21.
Garand, James, and Kathleen Clayton .1986. Socialization to partisanship in the U.S. House: The Speaker's Task Force. Legislative Studies Quarterly11:409-28.
22.
Hall, Richard, and Frank Wayman.1990. Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review84:797-820.
23.
Herrnson, Paul.1988. Party campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
—. 1989. National party decision making, strategies, and resource distribution in congressional elections. Western Political Quarterly42:301-23.
25.
—. 1992. National party organizations and the postreform Congress . In The postreform Congress, edited by Roger Davidson, 48-70. New York: St. Martin .
26.
Hurley, Patricia.1989. Parties and coalitions in Congress. In Congressional politics, edited by Christopher Deering, 113-34. Chicago: Dorsey.
27.
Jacobson, Gary.1985. The republican advantage in campaign finance. In The new direction in American politics, edited by John Chubb and Paul Peterson , 143-73. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
28.
—. 1993. The misallocation of resources in house campaigns . In Congress reconsidered, edited by Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer, 115-39. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
29.
Kellerman, Barbara.1984. The political presidency. New York : Oxford University Press.
30.
Kiewiet, Roderick, and Matthew McCubbins .1991. The logic of delegation . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Kolodny, Robin.1991. Leadership and the CCCs: The congressional campaign committees as a training ground. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
32.
Leyden, Kevin M., and Stephen A. Borrelli .1990. Party contributions and party unity: Can loyalty be bought? Western Political Quarterly43:343-65.
33.
Lockerbie, Brad.1989. Change in party identification: The role of prospective economic evaluations. American Politics Quarterly17:291-311.
34.
Markus, Gregory.1979. Analyzing panel data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Matthews, Donald.1960. U.S. senators and their world. New York: Vintage.
36.
O'Connor, Karen, and Larry Sabato.1993. American government: Roots and reform . New York: Macmillan.
37.
Oppenheimer, Bruce.1993. Declining presidential success with Congress. In The presidency reconsidered, edited by Richard Waterman, 75-82. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
38.
Palazzolo, Daniel.1992. From decentralization to centralization: Members' changing expectations for House leaders In The postreform Congress , edited by Roger Davidson, 112-26. New York: St. Martin.
39.
Patterson, Samuel, and Gregory Caldeira .1988. Party voting in the United States Congress. British Journal of Political Science18:111-31.
40.
Patterson, Samuel, and Thomas Little.1992. The organizational life of the congressional parties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
41.
Polsby, Nelson.1968. The institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives . American Political Science Review62:144-68.
42.
Porter, Stephen.1993Allocation strategies of congressional campaign committees . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois .
43.
Reichley, James.1985. The rise of national parties. In The new direction in American politics, edited by John Chubb and Paul Peterson, 175-200. Washington, DC: Brookings.
44.
Rohde, David, Norman Omstein, and Robert Peabody.1985. Political change and legislative norms in the U.S. Senate, 1957-1974. In Studies of Congress, edited by Glenn Parker, 147-88. Washington, DC. Congressional Quarterly.
45.
Rohde, David.1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Sabato, Larry.1987. The party's just begun. New York: St. Martin.
47.
Schlesinger, Joseph.1991. Political parties and the winning of office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
48.
Sinclair, Barbara.1983. Majority leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
—. 1992. The emergence of strong leadership in the 1980s House of Representatives. Journal of Politics54:657-84.
50.
Smith, Walter, and Denise von Herrmann .1992. Are PAC donations understated? The influence of interlocks on PAC behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , Chicago, Illinois.
51.
Sorauf, Frank.1988. Money in American elections. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
52.
Sorauf, Frank, and Paul Allen Beck .1988. Party politics in America . 6th ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
53.
Sorauf, Frank J., and Scott A. Wilson .1990. Campaigns and money: A changing role for the political parties? In The parties respond: Changes in the American party system, edited by L. Sandy Maisel, 187-203. Boulder, CO: Westview .
54.
Stanley, Harold, and Richard Niemi.1989. Vital statistics in American politics . 2d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
55.
Stem, Philip.1992. Still the best Congress money can buy. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
56.
Wekkin, Gary.1990. Dancing with the one who brung you: Party contributions and party unity in the U.S. Senate. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
57.
Wilhite, Al, and John Theilmann.1989. Campaign contributions by political parties: Ideology vs. winning. Atlantic Economic Journal17:11-20.
58.
Wright, John.1990. Contributions, lobbying, and committee voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review84:417-38.
