Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research exploring variation in party support in Congress often focuses solely on the impact of generational replacement. Generational replacement suggests that new generations of congressmen account for varying levels of party support. Recent work by Rohde (1992) and Hibbing (1992) points to the need to explore life cycle effects and period effects. The life cycle hypothesis suggests that members may become less supportive of party as their tenure increases. Period effects focus on the extent to which variation in party voting is explained by changes in support by continuing members. Cohort analysis allows investigation of each type of effect through measurement of cross-sectional, longitudinal, and time-lag differences. Results do not support a life cycle trend in party support. Findings indicate only limited support for the generational replacement hypothesis with support for the impact of period effects occurring in over 70% of the Congresses analyzed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asher, Herbert B. , and Herbert F. Weisberg . 1978. Voting change in Congress: Some dynamic perspectives on an evolutionary process American Journal of Political Science 22:391-425.

Brady, David. W. , Joseph Cooper , and Patricia A. Hurley . 1979. The decline of party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887-1968 Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:381-407

. Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How congressmen decide: A policy focus . New York: St. Martin's.

Glenn, Norval D. 1977. Cohort analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hibbing, John R. 1992. Congressional careers: Contours of life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Key, V.O., Jr. 1949. Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's voting decisions 2d ed. New York: Harper & Row.

Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1902. The influence of party upon legislation Annual Report of the American Historical Association for 1901 1:321-545

. Matthews, Donald R. , and James A. Stimson . 1975. Yeas and nays: Normal decision-making in the U.S. House of Representatives New York: Wiley.

10.

Palmore, Erdman. 1978. When can age, period, and cohort be separated? Social Forces 57:282-95

11.

. Parker, Glenn R. 1986. Homeward bound: Explaining changes in congressional behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

12.

Patterson, Samuel , and Gregory Caldeira. 1988. Party voting in Congress British Journal of Political Science 18:111-31

13.

. Rohde, David W. 1989. Something's happening here: What it is ain't exactly clear: Southern Democrats in the House of Representatives In Home Style and Washington Work, edited by Morris Fiorina and David W. Rhode. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

14.

—. 1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15.

—. 1992. Electoral forces, political agendas and partisanship in the House and Senate In The postreform Congress , edited by Roger H. Davidson. New York: St. Martin's.

16.

Sinclair, Barbara. 1985. Agenda, policy, and alignment change from Coolidge to Reagan In Congress reconsidered. 3d ed., edited by Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 291-314. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Party Support in the House of Representatives

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References