This article suggests a framework by which to organize information and evaluate policy alternatives. In this framework, equity, efficiency, effectiveness, and political feasibility are criteria for choosing policy alternatives. In addition, the framework includes strategies—the policy formulation and the compliance structure—for achieving these values. Among the three major types of school desegregation policy alternatives implemented since Brown v. Board of
Education —freedom of choice, mandatory reassignment, and magnet—voluntary—the magnet-voluntary alternative appears to achieve the greatest equity, efficiency, and effectiveness because it relies primarily on market-like incentives and an incremental decision-making approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armor, D.1980. White flight and the future of school desegregation . In School desegregation: Past, present and future edited by Walter G. Stephan and Joseph R. Feagan, 187-226. New York: Plenum .
2.
—. 1989. After busing: Education and choice. Public Interest95 (Spring). 24-37.
3.
— 1990. Survey of public school parents in Worcester, Massachusetts .
4.
Armor, D., and C.H. Rossell.1986. Survey of public and private school parents in Savannah-Chatham County, Georgia.
5.
—. 1989. Survey of public school parents in Natchez, Mississippi .
6.
—. 1990a. Survey of public school parents in DeKalb County, Georgia .
7.
— 1990b. Survey of public school parents in Topeka, Kansas .
8.
—. 1990c. Survey of public school parents in Stockton, California .
9.
Bardach, E.1977. The implementation game. Cambridge : MIT Press.
10.
Bobrow, D.B., and J.S. Dryzek.1987. Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
Braybrooke, D., and C.E. Lindblom.1970. A strategy of decision. New York: Free Press.
12.
Choran, C.1974. Political science and the public interest. Journal of Politics36:327-55.
13.
Cnudde, C.F., and D.J. McCrone.1969. Party competition and welfare policies in the American states. American Political Science Review63:858-66.
14.
Cochran, C.E., L.C. Mayer, T.R. Carr, and N.J. Cayer.1990. American public poltcy: An introduction . 3d ed. New York: St. Martin.
15.
Coleman, J., S. Kelly, and J. Moore.1975. Trends in school segregation, 1968-1973 . Washington, DC: Urban Institute .
16.
Cooper, K.J. (1982). Parents take new busing tack. Boston Globe, February 21, p. 107.
17.
Dror, Y.1968. Public policymaking reexamined. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
18.
Edmonds, J., and J.M. Reilly.1985. Global energy: Assessing the future . New York: Oxford University Press .
19.
Elkin, S., and B. Cook.1985. The public life of economic incentives . Policy Studies Journal13:797-813.
20.
Heidenheimer, A.J., H. Heclo, and C.T. Adams.1990. Comparative public policy: The politics of social choice in America, Europe, and Japan. 3d ed. New York: St. Martin.
21.
Hochschild, J.1981. What's fair? American beliefs about distributive justice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
—. 1984. The new American dilemma: Liberal democracy and school desegregation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Hofferbert, R.I.1966. The relations between public policy and some structural and environmental variables in the American states. American Political Science Review60:73-82.
24.
—. 1977. The study of public policy. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
Keeping Boston whole. 1992. Boston Globe. September 25, p. 20.
26.
Kelman, S.1981. What price incentives? Economists and the environment . Boston: Aubura House.
Rodgers, H.R., Jr.1986. Poor women, poor families: The economic plight of America's female-headed families. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
47.
Rossell, C.H.1988. Is it the busing or the blacks? Urban Affairs Quarterly24:138-148.
48.
—. 1990a. The carrot or the stick for school desegregation policy . Urban Affairs Quarterly25:474-99.
49.
—. 1990b. The carrot or the stick for school desegregation policy: Magnet schools or forced busing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
50.
—. 1992. The effectiveness of controlled choice desegregation plans: Does more control over choice produce more desegregation? Unpublished report.
51.
Rossell, C.H., and R.L. Crain.1982. The importance of political factors in explaining Northern school desegregation. American Journal of Political Science26:772-96.
52.
Sabatier, P.1991a. Toward better theories of the policy process: Political science and public policy. Political Science & Politics24:144-47.
53.
—. 1991b. Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Science & Politics24:147-56.
54.
Salisbury, R.H.1968. The analysis of public policy: A search for theories and roles. In Political science and public thought, edited by A. Ranney, 151-75. Chicago: Markham.
55.
Sharkansky, R., and R.I. Hofferbert .1969. Dimensions of state politics, economics, and public policy. American Political Science Review63:867-79.
56.
Stokey, E., and R. Zeckhauser.1978. A primer for policy analysis. New York: W. W. Norton.
57.
Stone, D.1988. Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
58.
Taylor, D.G.1986. Public opinion & collective action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Tobin, J.1970. On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics13:263-77.
60.
Uslaner, E.M.1985. Energy, issue agendas, and policy typologies. In Public policy and the natural environment, edited by M. Ingram and R. Kenneth Godwin, 101-22. New York: JAI.
61.
Welch, F., and A. Light.1987. New evidence on school desegregation . Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
62.
Wilson, J.Q.1984. Thinking about crime. 2d ed. New York: Basic Books.
