Research on the impact ot redistricting on the representational opportunity of political groups is frequently grounded on the assumption that a group's "fair representation" can be easily determined. In this article the author takes issue with this assumption and shows that because partisan behavior is quite sensitive to changes in the electoral environment, the partisan profile and, therefore, the fair representation of a given constituency is quite difficult to determine. As a result, theories of representation as well as the concept of its denial by gerrymander must be reconsidered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Backstrom, C., L. Robbins, and S. Eller.1978. Issues in gerrymandering: An exploratory measure of partisan gerrymandering applied to MinnesotaMinnesota Law Review62:1121-59
2.
. Burnham, W.D.1975. Insulation and responsiveness in congressional elections . Political Science Quarterly90:411-35
3.
. Butler, D., and S. Van Beck1990. Why not swing?PS23:178-84
4.
. Calvert, R., and J. Ferejohn.1985. Coattail voting in recent presidential electionsAmerican Political Science Review77:407-18
Cranor, J., G. Crawley, and R. Scheele.1989. The anatomy of a gerrymanderAmerican Journal of Political Science33:222-39
7.
. Ferejohn, J., and R. Calvert.1980Presidential coattails in historical perspectiveAmerican Journal of Political Science28:126-46
8.
. Griffith, E.1907. The rise and development of the gerrymander.Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
9.
Gudgin, G., and P. Taylor.1979. Seats, votes and the spatial organization of elections.London: Pion.
10.
Hardy, L.1977. Considering the gerrymanderPepperdine Law Review73:243-84
11.
. Incumbents angling for edge in 1990s redistricting. 1989Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report47:2734-38
12.
. Kernell, S., and B. Grofman.1990. Determining the predictability of partisan voting patterns in California elections, 1978-1984. In Political gerrymandering and the courts, edited by B. Grofman. New York: Agathon.
13.
King, G.1989. Representation through legislative redistricting: Astochastic approachAmerican Journal of Political Science33:787-824.
14.
King, G., and R. Browning.1987. Democratic representation and partisan bias in congressional electionsAmerican Political Science Review81:1251-73
15.
. Mann, T.1980. Unsafe at any margin.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
16.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. Kutner.1989. Applied linear regression models.2d ed. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
17.
Niemi, R.1985. The relationship between votes and seats: The ultimate question in political gerrymanderingUCLA Law Review33:185-212
18.
. —. 1990. The swing ratio as a measure of partisan gerrymandering In Political gerrymandering and the courts, edited by B. Grofman. New York: Agathon.
19.
Niemi, R., and J. Deegan.1978. A theory of political redistrictingAmerican Political Science Review72:1304-23
20.
. Rush, M.1990. Redistricting: The Supreme Court and American elections. Ph.D. dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD.
21.
Walker, J.1966. Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of the office block and party column ballotsMidwest Journal of Political Science10:448-63.
