According to conventional wisdom, policy-making tends to be incremental in character except under conditions of united party control of the presidency and Congress and, in particular, after a critical or realigning election. The 1986 Tax Reform Act violates this expectation. This case study examines the act to understand its passage and develops an alternative to the party government model to explain innovative policy-making under conditions of divided party government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bimbaum, Jeffrey H., and Alan S. Murray.1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch. New York: Random House.
2.
Brady, David.1988. Critical elections and congressional policy-making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Braybrooke, David, and Charles E. Lindblom.1963. A strategy of decision: Policy evaluation as a social process. New York: Free Press.
4.
Burns, James MacGregor.1963. The deadlock of democracy: Four-party politics in America . Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall .
5.
Conlon, Timothy, Margaret Wrightson, and David R. Bean.1989. Taxing choices: The politics of tax reform. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
6.
Derthick, Martha, and Paul Quirk.1985. The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings.
7.
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Martin Shefter.1990. Politics by other means: The declining importance of elections in America. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Hansen, Susan B.1983. The politics of taxation: Revenue without representation . New York: Praeger.
9.
Jones, Charles O. Forthcoming. The diffusion of responsibility: An alternative perspective for national party politics. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration.
10.
Kingdon, John W.1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
Leff, Mark H.1984. The limits of symbolic reform: The New Deal and taxation, 1933-1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Lindblom, Charles E.1965. The intelligence of democracy. New York: Free Press.
13.
Lowi, Theodore.1964. American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics16:677-715.
14.
Mayhew, David.1989. Does it make a difference whether party control of the American national government is unified or divided? Unpublished manuscript.
15.
Pierce, Lawrence.1971. The politics of fiscal policy formation. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
16.
Reese, Thomas J.1980. The politics of taxation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
17.
Rudder, Catherine E.1983. Tax policy: Structure and choice. In Making economic policy in Congress, ed. Allen Schick.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
18.
—. 1985. Fiscal responsibility and the revenue committees. In Congress reconsidered. 3d ed., ed. Bruce I. Oppenheimer and Lawrence C. Dodd.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
19.
—. 1989. Fiscal responsibility and the revenue committees. In Congress reconsidered, 4th ed., ed. Bruce I. Oppenheimer and Lawrence C. Dodd.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
20.
Schick, Allen.1980. Congress and money. Washington, DC : Urban Institute.
21.
Strahan, Randall W.1990. Change in Congress: The House Committee on Ways and Means . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
Sundquist, James.1988-1989. Needed: A new theory for the new era of coalition government in the United States. Political Science Quarterly (Winter): 613-35.
23.
Surrey, Stanley S.1957. The Congress and the tax lobbyist: How special tax provisions get enacted. Harvard Law Review70:1145-82.
24.
Verdier, James M.1988. A framework for predicting congressional action. TaxNotes (October 24): 435-46.
25.
Wall Street Journal.1985. March 29: 1.
26.
Waltman, Jerold L.1985. Political origins of the U.S. income tax. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
27.
Washington Post. 1986. January 24: A14.
28.
Weaver, R. Kent.1988Automatic government: The politics of indexation. Washington, DC: Brookings.
29.
Witte, John F.1985. The politics and development of the federal income tax . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
