Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The presidential nomination process in the United States permits to particular states predominant influence in determining party nominees. Other states are forced to accept lesser, even unimportant roles. An important factor in the disparity is media coverage. This research examines the impact of five variables on the coverage of state delegate selection events: the number of national convention delegates at stake, method of delegate selection, sequence of events, number of same-day events, and the closeness of the race. Linear regression analysis is used to estimate the effect of these variables on the percentage of newspaper stories about each state's primary or caucus. Three recent presidential nominations are studied: the Democratic party's in 1984 and 1988 and the Republican process in 1988. The findings demonstrate that state parties act strategically to enhance their importance in presidential nominations by manipulating the sequence and structure of delegate selection events.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich, J. 1980. Before the convention: Strategies and choices in presidential nomination campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bartels, L. 1988. Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Beckel, R. 1987. The 1988 presidential selection process: Flirting with disaster? Election Politics 4:2-5.

Beniger, J. 1976. Winning the presidential nomination: National polls and state primary elections, 1936-1972 . Public Opinion Quarterly 40:22-38.

Buell, E. H., Jr. 1987. Locals) and (cosmopolitans): National, regional, and state newspaper coverage of the New Hampshire primaries. In Media and momentum: The New Hampshire primary and nomination politics, edited by G. R. Orren and N. Polsby. Chatam, NJ: Chatam House .

Castle, D. 1987. A southern regional presidential primary in 1988: Will it work as planned? Election Politics 4:6-10.

Crotty, W. , and J. S. Jackson III. 1985. Presidential primaries and nominations . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Graber, D. R. 1984. Mass media and American politics. 2d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Hadley, C. , and H. Stanley. 1989. Super Tuesday 1988: Regional results and national implications. Publius 19:19-37.

10.

Matthews, D. 1978. Winnowing: The news media and the 1976 presidential nominations. In Race for the presidency, edited by J. Barber.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall .

11.

Mayer, W. 1987. The New Hampshire primary: A historical overview. In Media and Momentum, edited by G. Orren and N. Polsby. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

12.

Orren, G. 1985. The nomination process: Vicissitudes of candidate selection. In The elections of 1984, edited by M. Nelson. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

13.

Patterson, T. (1980) The mass media elections: How Americans choose their president. New York: Praeger.

14.

Polsby, N. 1983. Consequences of party reform. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

15.

Price, D. (1984) Bringing back the parties. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

16.

Stanley, H. , and C. Hadley. 1987. The southern presidential primary: Regional intentions with national implications. Publius 17:83-100.

Media Coverage of Presidential Primaries

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References