In order to shed light on the impact of reforms in selection procedures on the policy made by the federal courts, this article compares the voting patterns of United States courts of appeals judges appointed by President Jimmy Carter with those appointed by President Lyndon Johnson. The study shows that there are significant differences between the two groups of judges that are not attributable to affirmative action in the Carter selection system nor to changes in Johnson appointees' voting patterns over time. Although I acknowledge that there are other factors that may underlie the differences between the two groups of judges, I conclude that it is reasonable to assert that the differences are attributable to the Carter reforms in the selection process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkins, B. and J.J. Green (1976) "Consensus on the United States courts of appeals: illusion or reality?" Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.20 (November): 735-748.
2.
Berkson, L. (1979) "The U.S. Circuit Judge Nominating Commission: the candidates' perspectives." Judicature62 (May): 466-485.
3.
———and S.B. Carbon (1980) The United States Circuit Judge Nominating Commission: Its Members, Procedures and Candidates. Chicago: American Judicature Society.
4.
Carbon, S.B. (1978) "The U.S. Circuit Judge Nominating Commission: a comparison of two of its panels." Judicature62 (November): 233-245.
5.
Carp, R.A. and C.K. Rowland (1983) Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press.
6.
Chase, H.W. (1972) Federal Judges: The Appointing Process. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press .
7.
Flango, V. and C. Ducat (1979) "What difference does method of judicial selection make?" Justice System J.5: 25-43.
8.
Glick, H. (1983) Courts, Politics, and Justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Goldman, S. (1966) "Voting behavior on the U.S. courts of appeals, 1961-1964." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60: 374-383.
10.
———( 1967) "Judicial appointments to the United States courts of appeals." Wisconsin Law Rev. (Winter): 186-214.
11.
———( 1968) "Conflict and consensus in courts of appeals." Wisconsin Law Rev.2: 461-482.
12.
———( 1975) "Voting behavior on the U.S. courts of appeals revisited ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.69: 491-506.
13.
———( 1978) "A profile of Carter's judicial nominees." Judicature62 (November): 246-254.
14.
———( 1979) "Should there be affirmative action for the judiciary? " Judicature62 (May): 488-494.
---( 1983) "Reagan's judicial appointments at midterm: shaping the bench in its own image." Judicature66 (March): 334-347.
17.
Gottschall, J. (1983) "Carter's judicial appointments: the influence of affirmative action and merit selection in voting on the US. courts of appeals." Judicature67 (October): 165-173.
18.
Howard, J.W. (1981) Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System: a Study of the Second, Fifth, and District of Columbia Circuits. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
19.
Nagel, S.S. (1961) "Political party affiliation and judges' decisions ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.55: 843-850.
20.
Slotnick, E.E. (1979a) "The U.S. Circuit Judge Nominating Commission ." Law and Policy Q.1 (October): 465-496.
21.
---( 1979b) "What panelists are saying about the Circuit Judge Nominating Commission." Judicature62 (February): 320-324.
22.
———( 1980a) "Reforms in judicial selection: will they affect the Senate's role?" Judicature64 (August): 60-73.
23.
———( 1980b) "Reforms in judicial selection: will they affect the Senate's role? part II." Judicature64 (September): 115-131.
24.
———( 1981) "Federal appellate judge selection: recruitment changes and unanswered questions." Justice System J.6 (Fall): 283-304.
25.
———( 1983) "Lowering the bench or raising it higher? affirmative action and judicial selection during the Carter administration." Yale Law and Policy Rev.1 (Spring): 270-297.
26.
———( 1984) "Judicial selection systems and nomination outcomes: does the process make a difference?" Amer. Pol. Q.1 (April): 225-240.
27.
Walker, T.G. and D.J. Barrow (1985) "The diversification of the federal bench: policy and process ramifications." J. of Politics47 (May): 596-617.
