Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Nominating procedures in the American states rely on three types of primary elections: closed, open, and blanket. These systems vary with regard to the extent partisanship is injected into the process. The data show that members of Congress with the highest levels of party support in the House of Representatives are elected in states using closed primaries. However, this relationship between partisanship in office and use of the closed primary appears to result from the common determination of these two variables by regional differences and traditional patterns of interparty competition at the state level. In other words, the state systems that value partisanship the most will likely have closed primaries and elect representatives more likely to support their party.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABRAMOWITZ

McGLENDON

RAPOPORT

(1981) “A note on strategic voting in a primary election.” J. of Politics 43: 899–904

BERNSTEIN

R. A.

(1977) “Divisive primaries do hurt: U. S. Senate races, 1956–1972.” Amer. Pol. Sci. 71: 540–545

BORN

(1981) “The influence of House primary election divisiveness on general election margins, 1962–1976.” J. of Politics 43: 640–661

CLAUSEN

(1973) How Congressmen Decide. New York: St. Martin's

COMER

(1976) “Another look at the effects of the divisive primary: a research note.” Amer. Politics Q. 4: 121–128

DECKARD

(1976) “Political upheaval and congressional voting: the effects of the 1960s on voting patterns in the House of Representatives.” J. of Politics 38: 326–345

HACKER

(1965) “Does a ‘divisive’ primary harm a candidate's election chances?” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 59: 105–110

HEDLUND

R. D.

WATTS

M. W.

HEDGE

D. M.

(1982) “Voting in an open primary.” Amer. Politics Q. 10: 197–218

JACOBSON

G. C.

(1983) The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown

10.

JEWELL

M. E.

(1983) “Democrat or Republican?: voters' choice of a primary.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. Birmingham, November

11.

JEWELL

M. E.

OLSON

D. M.

(1982) American State Political Parties and Elections. Home-wood, IL: Dorsey

12.

JOHNSON

GIBSON

(1974) “The divisive primary revisited: party activists in Iowa.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 68: 67–77

13.

LADD

E. C.

(1982) Where Have All the Voters Gone? New York: Norton

14.

PIERSON

J. E.

SMITH

T. B.

(1975) “Primary divisiveness and general election success: a re-examination.” J. of Politics 37: 555–562

15.

SCOTT

R. K.

HREBENAR

R. J.

(1979) Parties in Crisis. New York: John Wiley

Closed Primaries and Party Support in Congress

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References