This article examines the legitimacy-conferring potential of the U.S. Supreme Court. Legitimacy-conferring potential is conceptualized as the Court's ability, through mere endorsement of a particular policy, to elevate mass acceptance of that policy. The study reports the results of three experiments utilizing a split-ballot design where, in general, one group is given a version of an issue endorsed by the Supreme Court and a second group is given the same issue not endorsed by the Court. In two of the experiments a third attribution condition is used where an issue is endorsed by the Supreme Court as interpreter of the Constitution. Based on the analysis of 16 policy issues across three experiments, the Court does not appear to have the power to legitimate specific policies bearing its stamp of approval.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adamany, D. (1973) "Legitimacy, realigning elections, and the Supreme Court." Wisconsin Law Rev. (September): 780-846.
2.
——— and J. Grossman (1983) "Support for the Supreme Court as a national policymaker ." Law and Politics Q.5 (October): 405-437.
3.
Ashmore, et al. (1979) "An experimental investigation of the double standard in the perception of international affairs." Pol. Behavior1: 123-136.
4.
Bem, D.J. and A. Allen (1974) "On predicting some of the people some of the time: the search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior." Psych. Rev.81: 506-520.
5.
Baas, L.R. (1980) "The Constitution as symbol: patterns of meaning ."Amer. Politics Q.8: 237-256.
6.
———( 1979) "The Constitution as symbol: the interpersonal sources of meaning of a secondary symbol." Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.23 (February): 101-120.
7.
Bickel, A. (1962) The Least Dangerous Branch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
8.
Birkby, R.H. (1966) "The Supeme Court and the Bible belt: Tennessee reaction to the Schemp decision." Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.10 (August): 304-315.
9.
Black, C.A. (1963) The People and the Court. New York: Macmillan.
10.
Blausten, A. and C.C. Ferguson (1957) Desegregation and the Law: The Meaning and Effect of the School Segregation Cases. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.
11.
Casey, G. (1974) "The Supreme Court and myth: an empirical investigation ." Law and Society Rev.8 (Spring): 386-419.
12.
Dabelko, D. (1981) "Evaluation of public policy." Experimental Study of Politics (Fall): 39-52.
13.
Dahl, R.A. (1957) "Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as national policy-maker." J. of Public Law6: 279-295.
14.
Dolbeare, K. and P. Hammond (1968) "The political party basis of attitudes toward the Supreme Court." Public Opinion Q.32 (Spring): 16-30.
15.
Funston, R. (1975) "The Supreme Court and critical elections." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.69 (September): 785-811.
16.
Jaros, D. and R. Roper (1980) "The U.S. Supreme Court: Myth, diffuse support, specific support, and legitimacy." Amer. Politics Q.8 (January): 85-105.
17.
Kessell, J. (1966) "Public perceptions of the Supreme Court." Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.10 (May): 167-191.
18.
Lefstein, N. et al. (1969) "In search of juvenile justice: In Re Gault and its implementation." Law and Society Rev.3: 491-502.
19.
Lerner, M. (1937) "The Constitution and Court as symbols." Yale Law J.46 (June): 1290-1319.
20.
Levine, J.P. (1973) "Constitutional law and obscene literature: an investigation of bookseller censorship practices," in T. Becker and M. Feeley (eds.), The Impact of Court Decisions. New York : Oxford Univ. Press.
21.
McNemar, Q. (1969) Psychological Statistics. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Medalle, R. et al. (1968) "Custodial police interrogation in our nation's capital: the attempt to implement Miranda." Michigan Law Rev.66: 1347-1422.
23.
Miller, A.J. (1974) "Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970 ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.68 (September): 951-972.
24.
Miller, A. (1965) "Some pervasive myths about the U.S. Supreme Court ." St. Louis Univ. Law J.19 (Winter): 153-189.
25.
Murphy, W.F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
26.
——— and J. Tanenhaus (1968) "Public opinion and the United States Supreme Court." Law and Society Rev.2 (May): 357-384.
27.
Parker, G. (1977) Political beliefs about the structure of government: Congress and the Presidency. Sage Professional Papers, American Politics Series.
28.
Petric, M. (1968) "The Supreme Court and authority acceptance." Western Pol. Q.21 (March): 5-19.
29.
Prothro, J. and C. Grigg (1960) "Fundamental principles of democracy: bases of agreement and disagreement." J. of Politics22 (May): 276-294.
30.
Rosen, C.M. (1974) "A test of presidential leadership of public opinion: the split ballot technique." Public Opinion Q.6: 282-290.
31.
Santi, L. (1977) Confidence in the executive branch of the federal government, 1973-1976. Unpublished.
32.
Sarat, A. (1977) "Legal obligation: a survey study." Polity9: 384-398.
33.
———( 1975) "Support for the legal system: an analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior." Amer. Politics Q.3 (January): 3-24.
34.
Schecter, F. (1915) "The early history of the tradition of the Constitution ." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.9 (November): 707-734.
35.
Sigelman, L. (1979) "Black and white differences in attitudes toward the Supreme Court: a replication in the 1970's." Social Sci. Q.60 (June): 113-119.
36.
——— and C. Sigelman (1981) "Presidential leadership of public opinion: from 'benevolent leader' to 'kiss of death.' " Experimental Study of Politics7: 1-22.
37.
Tanenhaus, J. and W. Murphy (1981) "Patterns of public support for the Supreme Court: a panel study." J. of Politics43: 24-39.
38.
Wasby, S. (1984) The Supreme Court in the Federal Judicial System . New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
39.
———( 1970) The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives . Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press .
