This study examines the use of analytical information by major House committees. The committees are differentiated according to Fenno's classification of members' legislative goals-reelection, making good public policy, or influence in the House. The study demonstrates that policy committees are more likely to use analytical information than the other committee types. This suggests that legislators' goal orientations are an important determinant of information use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bu Llock, C.S., III (1976) "Motivations for U.S. congressional committee preferences. Freshman of the 92nd Congress." Legislative Studies QuarterlyI (May) 201-212.
2.
Chartrand, R.L. (1976) "Legislative information systems in Congress: Present and potential," pp. 32-44 in J. A. Worthley (ed.) Comparative Legislative Information Systems. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
3.
Congressional Quarterly Inc. (1979a) "Budget is in, ethics is out in Congressional shopping for committee assignments." C. Q. Weekly Report37 (January 27): 155-156.
4.
——— ( 1979b) "Business, labor square off over Davis-Bacon Act repeal." C. Q Weekly Report37 (April 21): 754-756.
Dechert, C.R. (1967) "Availability of information for congressional operations," pp. 154-203 in A. de Grazia (ed.) Congress: The First Branch of Government. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
7.
Entin, K. (1973) "Information exchange in Congress: the case of the House Armed Services Committee." Western Pol. Q.26: 427-439.
8.
Fenno, R. ( 1973) Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Janda, K. (1967) "Information systems for Congress," pp. 403-443 in A. de Grazia (ed.) Congress: The First Branch of Government . Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10.
Jones, C.O. ( 1976) "Why Congress can't do policy analysis (or words to that effect." Policy Analysis2 (Spring): 251-264.
11.
Maisel, L.S. (1979) "Information and decision-making in House offices ." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
12.
" The mysterious ways Congress makes committee assignments" ( 1979) Natl. J. (February 3): 187-188.
13.
Schick, A. (1976) "The supply and demand for analysis on Capitol Hill." Policy Analysis2 (Spring): 215-234.
14.
U.S. Congress, House Appropriations Committee ( 1978) Legislative Branch Appropriations for 1975-1978. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
15.
U.S. Congress, Senate Commission on the Operation of the Senate (1976) Congressional Support Agencies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
16.
Zwier, R. (1979) "The search for information: Specialist, and and nonspecialists in the U.S. House of Representatives." Leg. Studies Q.4 (February): 31-42.
