This article tests the agenda-setting hypothesis with regard to national television news in 1974 and 1976. The results indicate a modest degree of overlap between news coverage and viewer perceptions of issue salience. Diachronic correlations, however, suggest that the causal direction of the relationship is unclear. Contrary to the hypothesis, the agenda- setting relationship is not increased among frequent viewers of television news. Exami nation of the salience rankings of each network's audience also fails to support the hy pothesis. Finally, the agenda-setting relationship is found to be totally unaffected by a battery of control variables including media usage, partisanship, politicization, and atti tudes toward the media. In concluding it is suggested that the overlap between issue sa lience and news coverage reflects the sensitivity of both variables to "real world" cues. It is recommended that longitudinal research be utilized to permit examination of issue sa lience as a function of both media content and individual-level variables.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkins, C.K., J. Galloway, and O.B. Nayman (1976) "News media exposure: political knowledge and campaign interest." Journalism Q.53 (Summer): 231-237.
2.
Becker, L.B. and J.M. McCleod (1976) "Political consequences of agenda-setting." Mass Communication Rev.3 (Spring): 8-15.
3.
Becker, L.B., M.E. McCombs, and J.M. McCleod (1975) "The development of political cognitions," pp. 21-63 in S. H. Chaffee (ed.) Political Communication: Issues and Strategies for Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
4.
Benton, M. and J. Frazier (1976) "The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information holding." Communication Research3 (July): 261-274.
5.
Bowers, T.A. (1973) "Newspaper political advertising and the agenda-setting function." Journalism Q.50 (Autumn): 552-555.
6.
Cohen, B.C. (1963) The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
7.
Erbring, L., E. Goldenberg, and A. Miller (1978) "Front-page news and real-world cues: another look at agenda-setting by the media." (mimeo)
8.
Funkhouser, G.R. (1973) "The issues of the sixties: an exploratory analysis in the dynamics of public opinion." Public Opinion Q.37 (Spring): 62-75.
9.
Graber, D.M. (1976) "Press and television as opinion resources in presidential campaigns." Public Opinion Q.40 (Fall): 285-303.
10.
——— (1971) "The press as opinion resource during the 1968 presidential campaign." Public Opinion Q.35 (Summer): 168-182.
11.
Klapper, J. (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.
12.
Lee, R.S.H. (1978) "Credibility of newspaper and television news." Journalism Q.55 (Summer): 282-287.
13.
McCleod J.M., L.B. Becker, and J.E. Byrne (1974) "Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press." Communication Research1 (April): 131-166.
14.
McCombs, M.E. (1977) "Newspapers versus television: mass communiction effects across time," pp. 89-105 in D. L. Shaw and M. E. McCombs (eds.) The Emergence of American Political Issues. New York: West.
15.
——— (1976) "Agenda-setting research: a bibliographic essay ." Pol. Communication Rev.1 (March): 1-7.
16.
——— (1972) "Mass communication in political campaigns: information, gratification and persuasion," pp. 169-194 in F. G. Kline and P. J. Tichenor (eds.) Current Perspectives in Mass Communication Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
17.
——— and L. Masel-Walters (1976) "Agenda-setting: a perspective on mass communication." Mass Communication Rev.3 (Spring): 3-7.
18.
McCombs, M.E. and D.L. Shaw (1972) "The agenda-setting function of mass media." Public Opinion Q.36 (Summer): 176-185.
19.
——— and E. Shaw (1972) "The news and public response: three studies of the agenda-setting power of the press." Presented to the Association for Education in Journalism.
20.
McCombs, M.E. and D. Weaver (1973) "Voters' need for orientation and use of mass communications ." Presented to the International Communication Association.
21.
Meadow, R.G. (1976) "Issue emphasis and public opinion: media in 1972 ." Amer. Politics Q.4 (April): 177-192.
22.
——— (1973) "Cross-media comparison of coverage of the 1972 presidential campaign." Journalism Q.50 (Autumn): 482-488.
23.
Nie, N.H., S. Verba, and J. Petrocik (1976) The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
24.
Palmgreen, P. and P. Clarke (1977) "Agenda-setting with local and national issues ." Communication Research4 (October): 435-452.
25.
Patterson, T.E. and R.D. McClure (1976a) "Setting the political agenda: print vs. network news."J. of Communication26 (Spring): 23-28.
26.
——— (1976b) The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: Putnam.
27.
Pelz, D.C. and E.M. Andrews (1964) "Detecting causal priorities in panel data." Amer. Soc. Rev.29 (December): 838-848.
28.
Pomper, G.R. (1975) Voters' Choice. New York: Dodd-Mead.
29.
Repass, D.E. (1971) "Issue salience and party choice." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.65 (June): 389-400.
30.
Robinson, J.P. (1971) "The audience for national television news programs ." Public Opinion Q.35 (Fall): 402-405.
31.
Roper, B.W. (1969) A Ten-Year View of Public Attitudes Toward Television and Other Mass Media 1959-1968. New York: Television Information Office.
32.
Shaw, D.L. and M.E. McCombs (1975) The Emergence of Public Issues: Political News and Voter Learning. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
