American Law Institute (1972) Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure.
2.
Ban, M. ( 1973) "The impact of Mapp v. Ohio on police behavior." Unpublished paper delivered at Midwest Political Science Association Meeting.
3.
Barlow, S. (1968) "Patterns of arrests for misdemeanor narcotics possession: Manhatten police practices." Criminal Law Bull.4 (December): 549-582.
4.
Blalock, H.M. (1960) Social Statistics. New York : McGraw-Hill.
5.
Campbell, D.T. and H.L. Ross (1968) "The Connecticut crackdown on speeding: time series data in a quasi-experimental analysis." Law and Society Rev.3 (August): 33-54.
6.
Canon, B.C. (1974) "Is the exclusionary rule in failing health? Some new data and a plea against a precipitous conclusion." Kentucky Law J.62 (Spring): 681-730.
7.
——— (1973) "Reactions of state supreme courts to a U.S. Supreme Court civil liberties decision." Law and Society Rev.8 (Fall): 109-134.
8.
Caporaso, J.A. (1973) "Quasi-experimental approaches to social science: perspectives and problems," in J. A. Caporaso and L. L. Roos (eds.) Quasi-Experimental Approaches: Testing Theory and Evaluating Policy. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern Univ. Press.
9.
Comment (1952a) "Search and seizure in Illinois: enforcement of the constitutional right to privacy." Northwestern Univ. Law Rev.47 (September): 493-507.
10.
——— (1952b) "Philadelphia police and the law of arrest." Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 100 (June): 1182-1216.
11.
Davies, T.Y. (1974) "On the limitations of empirical evaluations of the exclusionary rule." Northwestern Univ. Law Rev.69 (November): 740-798.
12.
Dolbeare, K.M. and P.E. Hammond (1971) The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
13.
Kamisar, Y. (1964) "On the tactics of police-prosecution oriented critics of the court." Cornell Law Q.49 (Spring): 436-477.
14.
——— (1959) "Wolf and Lustig ten years later: illegal state evidence in state and federal courts." Minnesota Law Rev.43 (May): 1083-1198.
15.
Katz, M. (1966) "The Supreme Court and the states: an inquiry into Mapp v.Ohio in North Carolina." North Carolina Law Rev.45 (October): 119-151.
16.
Kuh, R. ( 1962) "The Mapp case one year after: an appraisal of its impact in New York." New York Law J. (September 18): 4.
17.
L, W. ( 1965) "Improving police performance through the exclusionary rule: current police and court practices." Missouri Law Rev.30 (Spring): 391-458.
18.
Manwaring, D. (1968) "The impact of Mapp v. Ohio," in D. H. Everson (ed.) The Supreme Court as a Policy-Maker: Three Studies of the Impact of Judicial Decisions. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Public Affairs Research Bureau.
19.
Milner, N.A. (1971) The Court and Local Law Enforcement. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
20.
Murphy, M. (1966) "The problem of compliance by police departments ." Texas Law Rev.44 (April): 939-953.
21.
New York Times (1972) "Justice Department supports repeal of exclusionary rule." August 19: 19.
22.
Note ( 1967) "Interrogations in New Haven: the impact of Miranda." Yale Law Rev.76 (July): 1519-1648.
23.
Oaks, D.H. (1970) "Studying the exclusionary rule in search and seizure ." Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 37 (Summer): 665-757.
24.
Parker, W.H. (1957) "The California crime rise." J. of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Sci.47 (March): 721-729.
25.
Ranney, A. (1976) "Parties in state politics," in H. Jacob and K. N. Vines (eds.) Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown .
26.
U.S. Law Week (1973) February 20: 4138-4139.
27.
Wasby, S.L. (1973) "The communication of the Supreme Court's criminal procedure decisions: a preliminary mapping." Villanova Law Rev.18 (June): 1086-1118.
28.
--- ( 1970) The Impact of the United States Supreme Court. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey.
29.
Wilkes, D.E. (1974) "The new federalism in criminal procedure: state court evasion of the Burger court." Kentucky Law J.62 (Winter): 421-451.
