Democracies require militaries that protect citizen well-being without threatening to overthrow the government or otherwise jeopardize public safety. The military should therefore be firmly under the command of civilian elected leaders, playing a minimal role in the political process. Previous research examines whether the public thinks such boundaries of civil-military relations should exist, and finds that people can see the military as a check to democratically elected administrations in the opposing party. Here, we ask a parallel question: Does place of residence influence attitudes about the boundaries of civil-military relations? We expect rural individuals and those higher in rural resentment to similarly see the military as a check to a civilian government as previous research suggests that rural residents are resentful towards government and centers of power. Using original survey data, we find that people high in such rural resentment are sometimes more willing to defer to the military. Finally, we successfully replicate findings from Krebs et al. (2023) under a Democratic administration. These results have implications for democratic governance and public support, particularly among facets of the public that have lower trust in government.
BlankshainJ. D. (2020). A primer on us civil–military relations for national security practitioners. Wild Blue Yonder, 1(4), 1–30.
5.
BrooksR. (2020). Paradoxes of professionalism: Rethinking civil-military relations in the United States. International Security, 44(4), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00374
BurbachD. T. (2019). Partisan dimensions of confidence in the us military, 1973–2016. Armed Forces & Society, 45(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x17747205
8.
CerdaA. (2023). About half of republicans now say the U.S. is providing too much aid to Ukraine.
9.
CohenE. A. (2003). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime. Simon and Schuster.
10.
CoppockA.McClellanO. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 205316801882217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174
11.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
12.
DawkinsR.NemereverZ.MunisB. K.VervilleF. (2023). Place, race, and the geographic politics of white grievance. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09897-4
13.
DeschM. C. (2001). Civilian control of the military: The changing security environment. JHU Press.
14.
FeaverP. (2003). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
FeaverP. D. (2023). Thanks for your service: The causes and consequences of public confidence in the US military. Oxford University Press.
17.
FennellyK.FedericoC. (2008). Rural residence as a determinant of attitudes toward us immigration policy. International Migration, 46(1), 151–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00440.x
GimpelJ. G.LovinN.MoyB.ReevesA. (2020). The urban–rural gulf in american political behavior. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1343–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09601-w
20.
GolbyJ.FeaverP.DroppK. (2018). Elite military cues and public opinion about the use of military force. Armed Forces & Society, 44(1), 44–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x16687067
21.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Harvard University Press.
22.
JohnsonK.ScalaD. (2022). The rural-urban continuum and the 2020 us presidential election. The Forum, 20(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2022-2057
KrebsR.RalstonR. (2021a). Why conservatives turned on the u.s. military: Right-wing attacks are eroding trust in the armed forces. Foreign Affairs.
25.
KrebsR. R.RalstonR. (2021b). More deferential but also more political: How americans’ views of the military have changed over 20 years. War on the Rocks.
26.
KrebsR. R.RalstonR.RapportA. (2023). No right to be wrong: What americans think about civil-military relations. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2), 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592721000013
27.
LealD. L. (2005). American public opinion toward the military: Differences by race, gender, and class?Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x05278168
28.
LinJ.Lunz TrujilloK. (2023a). Are rural attitudes just republican?Political Science Research and Methods.
29.
LinJ.Lunz TrujilloK. (2023b). Urban-rural differences in non-voting political behaviors. Political Research Quarterly, 76(2), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221119195
30.
LinJ.Lunz TrujilloK. (2023c). Urban-rural residency, place identity and affective polarization in the united states. Presented at the 2023 annual meeting of the midwest political science association (MPSA) in Chicago, IL.
31.
Lunz TrujilloK. (2022). Rural identity as a contributing factor to anti-intellectualism in the u.s. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1509–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09770-w
32.
McKeeS. (2008). Rural voters and the polarization of american presidential elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096508080165
33.
MettlerS.BrownT. (2022). The growing rural-urban political divide and democratic vulnerability. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 699(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211070061
34.
MunisB. K.MemovicA.ChristleyO. (2023). Of rural resentment and storming capitols: An investigation of the geographic contours of support for political violence in the United States. Political Behavior, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09895-6
NemereverZ.RogersM. (2021). Measuring the rural continuum in political science. Political Analysis, 29(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.47
37.
OwensM. T. (2021). Maximum toxicity: Civil-military relations in the trump era. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(2), 99–119.
38.
RoddenJ. A. (2019). Why cities lose: The deep roots of the urban-rural political divide. Basic Books.
39.
RooduijnM. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773917000145
40.
ScalaD.JohnsonK. (2017). Political polarization along the rural-urban continuum? The geography of the presidential vote, 2000–2016. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217712696
41.
SchaefferK. (2022). A year later, a look back at public opinion about the us military exit from Afghanistan.
42.
ScherrS.LeinerD. L. (2021). The populist hotbed: How political attitudes, resentment, and justice beliefs predict both exposure to and avoidance of specific populist news features in the United States. PLoS One, 16(10), Article e0258220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258220
43.
ŠrolJ.ČavojováV.Ballová MikuškováE. (2022). Finding someone to blame: The link between covid-19 conspiracy beliefs, prejudice, support for violence, and other negative social outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 726076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726076
44.
ThompsonJ. (n.d.). Don’t fence me in! rural resentment and political trust in the United States. OSF Preprints. https://osf.io/kbny8
45.
UrbenH. A. (2021). Party, politics, and the post-9/11 army. Cambria.
46.
WallstenK. (2023). What the data says about the military’s recruiting crisis?RealClear Defense.
47.
WeinerS. K. (2022). Managing the military: The joint chiefs of staff and civil-military relations. Columbia University Press.
48.
WidmerT. (2017). Draining the swamp. The New Yorker.
49.
YounisM. (2023). Confidence in U.S. military lowest in over two decades. Gallup.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
