Gender gaps in partisanship, vote choice, and opinion are well documented in the American electorate. In 2016, men’s and women’s subjective economic evaluations—of their own circumstances and the broader economy—also diverged considerably. We investigate the size, structure, and explanations of this gap. Drawing on cross-sectional and panel data, we show that the gap widened to historic levels following Trump’s election, driven by increased optimism among white men and decline among women of color. Though partisan and objective economic differences across race-gendered groups contribute, they do not fully explain the widening divide. We hypothesize that Trump’s election altered Americans’ understanding of the socioeconomic hierarchy, producing new divides in subjective status perceptions. Gendered and racialized divides in subjective perceptions combined with partisanship and economic circumstances to re-open the gender gap in economic attitudes.
AbramowitzA. I.LanoueD. J.RameshS. (1988). Economic conditions, causal attributions, and political evaluations in the 1984 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 848–863. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131382
BarnesT. D.CasseseE. C. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916675738
4.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2016). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations (No. w21913). National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.De BoefS.LinT.-M. (2004). The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055404001315
6.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553947
CasseseE. C.BarnesT. D. (2019). Reconciling sexism and women’s support for republican candidates: A look at gender, class, and whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 presidential races. Political Behavior, 41(3), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2
9.
ClarkeH. D.StewartM. C.AultM.ElliottE. (2005). Men, women and the dynamics of presidential approval. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123405000025
10.
CondonM.WichowskyA. (2015). Same blueprint, different bricks: Reexamining the sources of the gender gap in political ideology. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.992793
11.
CondonM.WichowskyA. (2020a). The economic other: Inequality in the American political imagination. University of Chicago Press.
12.
CondonM.WichowskyA. (2020b). Inequality in the social mind: Social comparison and support for redistribution. Journal of Politics, 82(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1086/705686
13.
DeckmanM. (2016). Tea party women: Mama grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right. NYU Press.
14.
Democracy Fund Voter Study Group. (2021). Views of the electorate research survey. Retrieved from. https://www.voterstudygroup.org
15.
DohertyC.KileyJ.O’HeaO. (2018). Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voter’s party identification. Pew Research Center.
16.
DuchR. M.PalmerH. D.AndersonC. J. (2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669272
17.
EdelmanM. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press.
18.
EvansG.PickupM. (2010). Reversing the causal arrow: The political conditioning of economic perceptions in the 2000–2004 US presidential election cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1236–1251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000654
19.
EvansM. D.KelleyJ. (2004). Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/16.1.3
GerberA. S.HuberG. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00424.x
22.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), S57–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
23.
GoldinC.KatzL. F.KuziemkoI. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.4.133
HegewischA.HartmannH. (2018). The gender wage gap: 2018 earnings differences by race and ethnicity. Institute for Women's Policy Research. Retrieved from. https://iwpr.org/publications/gender-wage-gap-2018/
27.
HuddyL.CasseseE.LizotteM.-K. (2008). Gender, public opinion, and political reasoning. In WolbrechtC.BeckwithK.BaldezL. (Eds.), Political women and American democracy (pp. 31–49). Cambridge University Press.
28.
IversenT.RosenbluthF. (2006). The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00166.x
29.
JacksonM.GruskyD. B. (2018). A post-liberal theory of stratification. British Journal of Sociology, 69(4), 1096–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12505
KanthakK.NorranderB. (2004). The enduring gender gap. In WeisberbH. F.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Models of voting in presidential elections: The 2000 US election (p. 141). Stanford University Press.
KaufmannK. M. (2002). Culture wars, secular realignment, and the gender gap in party identification. Political Behavior, 24(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021824624892
34.
KaufmannK. M.PetrocikJ. R. (1999). The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 864–887. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991838
35.
LamontM.ParkB. Y.Ayala-HurtadoE. (2017). Trump's electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), S153–S180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12315
36.
LindemannK.SaarE. (2014). Contextual effects on subjective social position: Evidence from European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715214527101
37.
LizotteM.-K. (2020). Gender differences in public opinion: Values and political consequences. Temple University Press.
38.
MaxwellA.ShieldsT. (2019). The long southern strategy: How chasing white voters in the south changed American politics. Oxford University Press.
39.
McCallL.OrloffA. S. (2017). The multidimensional politics of inequality: Taking stock of identity politics in the US presidential election of 2016. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), S34–S56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12316
40.
MillerW. E. (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to the basics. American Political Science Review, 85(2), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963175
41.
MutzD. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote (p. 201718155). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
42.
NorranderB. (1999). The evolution of the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(4), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1086/297871
43.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2001). Women and democracy: Cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2001.0054
44.
NorrisP.InglehartR. F. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
45.
OndercinH. L. (2017). Who is responsible for the gender gap? The dynamics of men’s and women’s democratic macropartisanship, 1950–2012. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917716336
46.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
47.
PiffP. K.StancatoD. M.CôtéS.Mendoza-DentonR.KeltnerD. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118373109
48.
SearsD. O. (2001). The role of affect in symbolic politics. In KuklinskiJ. H.ChongD. (Eds.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 14–40). Cambridge University Press.
49.
ShapiroR. Y.MahajanH. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/268958
50.
ShayoM. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090194
51.
SidesJ.TeslerM.VavreckL. (2019). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.
52.
SmialekJ. (2019, July 1). Minority women are winning the jobs race in a record economic expansion. The New York Times.
53.
StrolovitchD. Z.WongJ. S.ProctorA. (2017). A possessive investment in white heteropatriarchy? The 2016 election and the politics of race, gender, and sexuality. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1310659
54.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Civilian labor force participation rate: Men [LNS11300001] and women [LNS11300002]. Retrieved from. https://fred.stlouisfed.org
55.
WelchS.HibbingJ. (1992). Financial conditions, gender, and voting in American national elections. The Journal of Politics, 54(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131650
56.
WilliamsJ. C. (2017). White working class: Overcoming class cluelessness in America. Harvard Business Press.
