Can engagement with far-right social media communities socialize users into a new political identity? This study addresses concerns about the spread of far-right groups on mainstream social media platforms by examining how newcomers are affected by their engagement with these groups. I theorize that changes in social identity expression indicative of socialization will be measurable in the language users use to express themselves on social media, and that the magnitude of this linguistic change will intensify with more frequent far-right engagement. I develop a custom dictionary of far-right-relevant terms sourced from communities like The Daily Stormer and Stormfront. Using an original dataset of Reddit user posting histories from 2015–2017, I test for increases in the frequency of this far-right vocabulary. I find that users who engage often with a far-right community like r/The_Donald begin to sound more like white nationalists within three months. Socialized users also use far-right vocabulary more frequently in other spaces on their platform, contributing to the spread and normalization of far-right rhetoric.
AnderssonE. (2015). Situational political socialization: A normative approach to young people’s adoption and acquisition of political preferences and skills. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(8), 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1020926
2.
AndolinaM. W.JenkinsK.ZukinC.KeeterS. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909650300221x
3.
BarberáP.JostJ. T.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. A.BonneauR. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
4.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
5.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1995). An audit of the deficit in social capital. Duke University.
6.
BuyukozturkB.GauldenS.Dowd-ArrowB. (2018). Contestation on Reddit, Gamergate, and movement barriers. Social Movement Studies, 17(5), 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1483227
7.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
8.
CentolaD.González-AvellaJ. C.EguíluzV. M.San MiguelM. (2007). Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(6), 905–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707307632
9.
ChambersJ. K. (2002). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
10.
ChristensenD. J.LovettJ.CurielJ. A. (2022). Mainstream media recirculation of trust-reducing social media messages. American Politics Research, 50(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211023931
ConnollyT.JessupL.ValacichJ. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36(6), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689
14.
CunninghamM. (2001). The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children’s attitudes toward gender and household labor in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00111.x
15.
Danescu-Niculescu-MizilC.WestR.JurafskyD.LeskovecJ.PottsC. (2013). No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web '13, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilMay 13-17, 2013.
16.
DavisR. (2009). Typing politics: The role of blogs in American politics. Oxford University Press.
FriscoM. L.MullerC.DodsonK. (2004). Participation in voluntary youth-serving associations and early adult voting behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 660–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00238.x
GreeneM. T. (2021). Speech given to US House of Representatives. Accessed through C-SPAN Congressional Chronicle Archives.
29.
GumperzJ. J.Cook-GumperzJ. (1982). Introduction: Language and the communication of social identity. In GumperzJ. J. (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 1–21). Cambridge University Press.
HillK. A.HughesJ. E. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the internet. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
32.
HillK. Q.MatsubayashiT. (2005). Civic engagement and mass-elite policy agenda agreement in American communities. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051610
HumphriesM.MullerC.SchillerK. S. (2013). The political socialization of adolescent children of immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 94(5), 1261–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12025
36.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090719
37.
KennedyI.WackM.BeersA.SchaferJ. S.Garcia-CamargoI.SpiroE. S.StarbirdK. (2022). Repeat spreaders and election delegitimization: A comprehensive dataset of misinformation tweets from the 2020 U.S. Election. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.013
38.
KieslerS.KrautR.ResnickP.KitturA. (2011). Regulating behavior in online communities. In KrautR. E.ResnickP. (Eds.), Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (pp. 125–178). MIT Press.
39.
KieslerS.SiegelJ.McGuireT. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
KleinC.CluttonP.DunnA. G. (2019). Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum. PLoS One, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225098
KonrathS. H.O’BrienE. H.HsingC. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
44.
LabovW. (1962). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press.
45.
LareauA. (2018). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. In GruskyD.HillJ. (Eds.), Inequality in the 21st century. Routledge.
46.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M. (2002). Party polarization and conflict extension in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088434
47.
Lewis-BeckM. S. (2008). The American voter revisited. University of Michigan Press.
48.
LippmannW. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
49.
MasonL. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.
50.
McCullochG. (2019). Because internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Penguin Publishing.
NguyenT. (2016, September 11). Donald Trump Jr. shares white supremacist meme. Vanity Fair.
53.
NiemiR. G.JenningsM. K. (1991). Issues and inheritance in the formation of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111502
PfaffN. (2009). Youth culture as a context of political learning: How young people politicize amongst each other. YOUNG, 17(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880901700204
58.
PriorM. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647733
RosenstoneS. J.HansonJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan.
63.
SchulzeH. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
64.
SearsD.LevyS. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In SearsD.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 60–109). Oxford University Press.
65.
SettleJ. E.BondR.LevittJ. (2011). The social origins of adult political behavior. American Politics Research, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x10382195
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Brooks/Cole.
TurkleS. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Books.
74.
TylerM.IyengarS. (2022). Learning to dislike your opponents: Political socialization in the era of polarization. American Political Science Review, 117, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200048X
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
77.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BurnsN. (2005). Family ties: Understanding the intergenerational transmission of political participation. In ZuckermanA. S. (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 95–114). Temple University Press.
78.
VerkuytenM. (2021). Group identity and in-group bias: The social identity approach. Human Development, 65(5-6), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519089
XenosM.FootK. (2008). Not your father’s internet: The generation gap in online politics. In BennettW. L. (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MIT Press.
ZannettouS.CaulfieldT.De CristofaroE.KourtelrisN.LeontiadisI.SirivianosM.StringhiniG.BlackburnJ. (2017). The web centipede: Understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC(’17), pp. 405–417). NY, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131365.3131390
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
