Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Is approval of Donald J. Trump associated with support for political violence? If so, what explains the link between Trump approval and political violence? Using an original, nationally representative survey of over 1,500 adults in the United States we produce two findings. First, individuals who express approval for Trump are also significantly more likely to endorse positive descriptors for the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol and are more likely express support for the use of political violence more broadly. Second, the effects of Trump approval on support for the use of political violence are mediated through racist and xenophobic attitudes. Trump supporters in the study disproportionately exhibit racist and xenophobic/anti-foreigner attitudes, and these attitudes are associated with a positive endorsement of both January 6 and the use of political violence.

Keywords

political violence January 6 Trump xenophobia racism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agriesta

(2021). CNN Poll: Most Americans think election results could lead to violence in the coming years. CNN, 12(March). https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/12/politics/cnn-poll-political-divisions

Armaly

M. T.

Buckley

D. T.

Enders

A. M.

(2021). Christian nationalism and political violence: Victimhood, racial identity, conspiracy and support for the Capitol attacks. Political Behavior, 44(2), 937–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09758-y

Balz

Clement

Guskin

(2022). Republicans and Democrats divided over Jan. 6 insurrection and Trump’s culpability, Post-UMD poll finds. The Washington Post. January 1.

Bartels

L. M.

(2020). Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(37), 22752–22759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007747117

Blair

Christine Fair

Malhotra

Shapiro

J. N.

(2013). Poverty and support for militant politics: Evidence from Pakistan. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00604.x

Brewer

M. B.

(1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126

Brigham

J. C.

(1993). College students’ racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(23), 1933–1967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01074.x

Bright Line Watch (2020). American democracy on the eve of the 2020 election. Bright line Watch October 2020 surveys. http://brightlinewatch.org/american-democracy-on-the-eve-of-the-2020-election/

Bryant

F. B.

Smith

B. D.

(2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the buss–perry aggression questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302

10.

Cassese

E. C.

Farhart

C. E.

Miller

J. M.

(2020). Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Politics & Gender, 16(4), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000409

11.

Cineas

(2021). Donald Trump is the accelerant: A comprehensive timeline of Trump encouraging hate groups and political violence. Vox. January 9.

12.

Clayton

Davis

N. T.

Nyhan

Porter

Ryan

T. J.

Wood

T. J.

(2021). Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 118(23), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024125118

13.

Coppock

McClellan

(2019). Validating the demographic: Political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174

14.

Cox

(2021). After the ballots are counted: Conspiracies, political violence, and American exceptionalism. Survey Center on American Life. American Enterprise Institute. January. https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/after-the-ballots-are-counted-conspiracies-political-violence-and-american-exceptionalism/

15.

Cutts

Ford

Goodwin

M. J.

(2011). Anti-immigrant, politically disaffected or still racist after all? Examining the attitudinal drivers of extreme right support in britain in the 2009 European elections. European Journal of Political Research, 50(3), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01936.x

16.

Diamond

Drutman

Lindberg

Kalmoe

Mason

(2020). Americans increasingly believe violence is justified if the other side wins.

17.

Edwards

G. S.

Rushin

(2018). The effect of President Trump's election on hate crimes. Available at SSRN 3102652 .

18.

Feinberg

Branton

Martinez-Ebers

(2019). The Trump effect: How 2016 campaign rallies explain spikes in hate. Texas AM University Commerce mimeo.

19.

Georgetown University Institute of Politics and Public Service (2019). New Poll: Voters find political divisions so bad, believe U.S. is two-third of the way to “Edge of a Civil War”. October 23. https://politics.georgetown.edu/2019/10/23/new-poll-voters-find-political-divisions-so-bad-believe-u-s-is-two-thirds-of-the-way-to-edge-of-a-civil-war/

20.

Glick

Lameiras

Castro

Y. R.

(2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47(9), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949

21.

Hicks

Tingley

(2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201100

22.

Hogg

M. A.

Abrams

Brewer

M. B.

(2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690909

23.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

(2010a). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761

24.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

Yamamoto

(2010b). Causal mediation analysis using R Advances in social science research using R (pp. 129–154). Springer.

25.

Kalmoe

N. P.

(2014). Fueling the fire: Violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852642

26.

Kalmoe

N. P.

Mason

(2019, January). Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence, correlates, and electoral contingencies. National Capital Area Political Science Association American Politics Meeting.

27.

Kalmoe

N. P.

Mason

(2021). Is political violence justified? Monkey cage. Washington Post. January 11. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/11/what-you-need-know-about-how-many-americans-condone-political-violence-why/

28.

Kalmoe

N. P.

Mason

(2022). Radical American partisanship: Mapping violent hostility; its causes, and the consequences for democracy. University of Chicago Press.

29.

Kelly

C. R.

(2020). Donald J. Trump and the rhetoric of ressentiment. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 106(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1698756

30.

Kunst

J. R.

Boos

Kimel

S. Y.

Obaidi

Shani

Thomsen

(2018). Engaging in extreme activism in support of others’ political struggles: The role of politically motivated fusion with out-groups. PloS one, 13(1), Article e0190639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190639

31.

Levine

(2020). ‘No Blame?’ ABC News Finds 54 cases invoking ‘Trump’ in connection with violence, threats, alleged assaults. ABC News. May 30.

32.

Lipscomb

(2017). Hate-fueled attacks rattle Florida after Trump’s election. Miami New Times.

33.

Lopez

(2020). Donald Trump’s long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2020. Vox. August 13.

34.

Mason

Wronski

Kane

J. V.

(2021). Activating animus: The uniquely social roots of Trump support. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1508–1516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000563

35.

Merrilees

C. E.

Cairns

Taylor

L. K.

Goeke‐Morey

M. C.

Shirlow

Cummings

E. M.

(2013). Social identity and youth aggressive and delinquent behaviors in a context of political violence. Political Psychology, 34(5), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12030

36.

Miller

J. M.

(2020). Psychological, political, and situational factors combine to boost COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 53(2), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842392000058X

37.

Motta

(2021). Republicans, not Democrats, are more likely to endorse anti-vaccine misinformation. American Politics Research. 1532673X211022639.

38.

Nacos

B. L.

Shapiro

R. Y.

Bloch-Elkon

(2020). Donald Trump. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(5), 2–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26940036

39.

Newman

Merolla

J. L.

Shah

Lemi

D. C.

Collingwood

Ramakrishnan

S. K.

(2021). The Trump effect: An experimental investigation of the emboldening effect of racially inflammatory elite communication. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000590

40.

Newport

Saad

(2021). Presidential job approval. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(1), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa061

41.

Obaidi

Bergh

Sidanius

Thomsen

(2018). The mistreatment of my people: Victimization by proxy and behavioral intentions to commit violence among Muslims in Denmark. Political Psychology, 39(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12435

42.

Panagopoulos

(2012). Ex-Presidential approval: Retrospective evaluations of presidential performance. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42(4), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.04014.x

43.

Saucier

(2013). Isms dimensions: Toward a more comprehensive and integrative model of belief-system components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 921. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031968

44.

Schaffner

B. F.

MacWilliams

Nteta

(2016). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. In Conference on the US Elections, (pp. 8–9).

45.

Semyonov

Raijman

Gorodzeisky

(2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988-2000. American sociological review, 71(3), 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100304

46.

Sides

Tesler

Vavreck

(2019). Identity crisis. Princeton University Press.

47.

Swaine

Adolphe

(2019). Violence in the name of Trump (August 28). The Guardian.

48.

Sylvester

S. M.

(2021). COVID-19 and motivated reasoning: The influence of knowledge on COVID‐Related Policy and Health Behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2341–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12989

49.

Thomsen

Obaidl

Sheehy-Skeffington

J. A.

Kteily

Sidanius

(2014). Individual differences in relational motives interact with the political context to produce terrorism and terrorism-support. Behavioral and brain sciences.

50.

Weinschenk

A. C.

Panagopoulos

van der Linden

(2021). Democratic norms, social projection, and false consensus in the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(3-4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939568

51.

Westwood

S. J.

Grimmer

Tyler

Nall

(2022). Reply to Kalmoe and Mason: The pitfalls of using surveys to measure low-prevalence attitudes and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), Article e2207584119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220758411

It’s About Hate: Approval of Donald Trump,Racism,Xenophobia and Support for Political Violence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References