Conservative intellectuals have expressed concern that Donald Trump has tarnished the conservative brand with his authoritarian-populist rhetoric and style of governing. What exactly is Donald Trump’s effect on this ideological label? In this paper I replicate work showing that members of Congress who have openly supported Trump are seen as more conservative than those who do not openly support him. I then test this relationship experimentally and explore whether a pro (or anti) Trump cue alone drives this perception or whether other perceived, unstated issue positions might influence this result. I find that supporting Trump moves candidates rightward compared to a control group, and this effect is about twice as large as the anti-Trump cue which moves candidates leftward. I also find that candidates who support Trump are more likely to be associated with additional issue-related content, which could affect ideological perception. Roadmaps for extensions are also discussed.
AmiraK. (2018). Do people contrast and assimilate candidate ideology? An experimental test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 5(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2018.6
2.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHopkinsDanYamamoto (2021). Conjoint Survey Experiments. In DruckmanJamesGreenDonald (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Political Science (pp. 19–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
BoebertL. (2020, August 25). @LaurenBoebert. “I’ve received an invitation from President Trump to attend his acceptance speech at the White House on Thursday evening. It is an absolute honor to be chosen as one of President Trump’s guests at this important event”. https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1298220510057246720?lang=en
6.
BrewerM. B. (2001). “The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology”. Political Psychology, 22(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00229
ConlanT.DinanJ. (2007). Federalism, the bush administration, and the transformation of American conservatism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjm009
9.
ConoverPamelaFeldmanStanley (1981). The Origin and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-identification. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–645.
10.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. Free Press.
11.
ConverseP. E. (1975). Some mass-elite contrasts in the perception of political spaces. Social Science Information, 14(3), 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400303
EllisC.StimsonJ. A. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press.
16.
EllisC.StimsonJ. A.SnidermanP. M.HightonB. (2011). Pathways to conservative identification. In Facing the challenge of democracy: Explorations in the analysis of public opinion and political participation (pp. 120–148). Princeton University Press.
17.
EyalP.DavidR.AndrewG.ZakE.EkaterinaD. (2021). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
18.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
19.
GogginS. N.HendersonJ. A.TheodoridisA. G. (2020). What goes with red and blue? Mapping partisan and ideological associations in the minds of voters. Political Behavior, 42(4), 985–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09525-6
20.
HendersonJ. A.DanceyL.GogginS.SheagleyG.TheodoridisA. G. (Forthcoming). Primary divisions: How voters evaluate policy and non-policy differences between co- party politicians. The Journal of Politics.
21.
HopkinsD. J.NoelH. (2021). Trump and the shifting meaning of “conservative”: Using activists’ pairwise comparisons to measure politicians’ perceived ideologies. American Political Science Review, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001416
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY. (2012). Affect, not ideology- a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
24.
JacobsmeierM. L. (2015). From black and white to left and right: Race, perceptions of candidates’ ideologies, and voting behavior in US House elections. Political Behavior, 37(3), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9283-3
25.
JohnsonA.AmiraK. (2020). #NeverTrump and the Fourth Estate. In PieperA.DewittJ. (Eds.), The Republican resistance: #nevertrump conservatives and the future of the GOP. Lexington Books.
KochJ. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations?The Journal of Politics, 62(2), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00019
LevitinT. E.MillerW. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955402
MalkaA.LelkesY. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3
35.
MasonL. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
36.
McDermottM. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918. https://doi.org/10.2307/449110
37.
MutzDiana (2021). Improving experimental treatments in political science. In DruckmanJamesGreenDonald (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Political Science (pp. 219–238). New York: Cambridge University Press.
RobinC. (2011). The reactionary mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. Oxford University Press.
40.
SigelmanC. K.SigelmanL.WalkoszB. J.NitzM. (1995). Black candidates, white voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111765
StimsonJ. A. (1976). Belief systems: Constraint, complexity and the 1972 election. In NiemiR. G.WeisbergHerbert F. (Eds.), Controversies in American voting behavior (pp. 138–159). Freeman.
44.
ZschirntS. (2011). The origins & meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications revisited. Political Behavior, 33(4), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9145-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
