How do states differ in how difficult they make voter registration, and what effect does this have on voters? We propose and validate a new Difficulty of Registration Index (DORI) calculated via an item response theory (IRT) model of five key dimensions of registration (automaticity, portability, deadline, mode, and preregistration) for each state from 2004 to 2020. Since 2004, most states eased registration processes, with Democratic statehouses in racially diverse and young states leading the way. Using CCES data, we find that DORI is associated with increased probability that voters experience problems registering and failing to turnout (in both self-reported and validated turnout data). These effects are pronounced for young voters. This study holds lessons for how restrictive registration procedures can change the shape of the electorate and make it harder to achieve political equality.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. The handbook of attitudes. Editors. AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaMahwahM. P., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.173–221.
3.
AnsolabehereSDHershEShepsleKA. (2012). Movers, stayers, and registration: Why age is correlated with registration in the U.S. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 7:1–31.
4.
BenteleK.G.O’BrienE.E. (2013). Jim Crow 2.0? Why states consider and adopt restrictive voter access policies. Perspectives on Politics11(4), 1088–1116.
5.
BerryW. D.FordingR. C.RingquistE. J.HansonR. L.KlarnerC. E. (2010). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the US states: a re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 117–135.
6.
BiggersD.R.HanmerM.J. (2015). Who makes voting convenient? Explaining the adoption of early and no-excuse absentee voting in the American states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly15(2): 192–210.
7.
BiggersD.R.HanmerM.J. (2017). Understanding the adoption of voter identification laws in the american states. American Politics Research, 45(4), 560–588.
BurdenB.C.CanonD.T.MayerK.R.MoynihanD.P. (2014). Election laws, mobilization, and turnout: the unanticipated consequences of election reform. American Journal of Political Science58(1):95–109.
10.
CarminesE.G.ZellerR.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishers
11.
CoppockA.GreenD.P. (2016). Is voting habit forming? New evidence from experiments and regression discontinuities. American Journal of Political Science60, 4: 1044–1062.
12.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
13.
FowlerA. (2017). Does voter preregistration increase youth participation?Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy16(4):121. DOI: 10.1089/elj.2017.0436
14.
FragaB.HolbeinJ. (2020). Measuring youth and college student voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 65, 102086.
15.
GrumbachJ.M. (2021). Laboratories of democratic backsliding. Working paper.
16.
GrumbachJ.M.HillC. (2020). Rock the registration: same-day registration increases turnout of young voters. Journal of Politics, 13, 164. DOI: 10.1086/714776
17.
HansenT.JensenJ.M. (2007). Understanding voters’ decisions: a theory of planned behavior approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87–94.
18.
HarmonLaurenPosnerCharlesJawondoMicheleDhaitiMatt (2015). The Health of State Democracies. Center for American Progress Action Fund.
19.
HerrickR.PryorB. (2021). Forthcoming. Gender and race gaps in voting and over-reporting: an intersectional comparison of CCES with ANES data. Social Science Journal, 12, 147. DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1809901
20.
HicksW.D.McKeeS.C.SellersM.D.SmithD.A. (2015). A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 18–33.
21.
HicksW.D.McKeeS.C.SmithD.A. (2016). A bipartisan election reform? Explaining support for online voter registration in the American states. American Politics Research44(6), 1008–1036.
22.
HightonB. (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics59(2): 565–575.
23.
HightonB. (2000). Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Political Behavior22(2), 109–120.
24.
HillK.Q.LeighleyJ. (1999). Racial diversity, voter turnout, and mobilizing institutions in the united states. American Politics Quarterly27(3), 275–295.
25.
HolbeinJ. B.HillygusD.S. (2016). Making young voters: The impact of preregistration on youth turnout. American Journal of Political Science60(2), 364–382.
26.
JuelichC.L.CollJ.A. (2020). Rock the vote or block the vote? How the cost of voting affects the voting behavior of American youth. American Politics Research48 (6), 719–724.
KingJ.D. (1994). Political culture, registration laws, and voter turnout among the American states. Publius: The Journal of Federalism24(4), 115–127.
30.
KnackS.WhiteJ. (2000). Election-day registration and turnout inequality. Political Behavior, 22(1), 29–44.
31.
LaroccaR.KlemanskiJ.S. (2011). US state election reform and turnout in presidential elections. State Politics & Policy Quarterly11(1), 76–101.
32.
LawlessJ.L.FoxR. (2015). Running from Office: Why young Americans are turned off to politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
LeighleyJ.NaglerJ. (2014). Who votes Now? Demographics, issues, Inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
LevitskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
35.
LiQ.Pomante IIM.SchrafnagelS. (2018). Cost of Voting in the American states. Election Law Journal17(3), 234–247.
36.
MannC.B.GronkeP.AdonaN. (2020). Framing automatic voter registration: partisanship and public understanding of automatic voter registration. American Politics Research48(6), 693–699.
37.
McDonaldM.P. (2008). Portable voter registration. Political Behavior30 (4), 491–501.
38.
McGheeE.RomeroM. (2020). Registration effects of automatic voter registration in the United States. Unpublished manuscript.
NetemeyerR. G.BurtonS. (1990). Examining the relationships between voting behavior, intention, perceived behavioral control, and expectation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(8), 661–680.
45.
PlutzerE. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Interia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review96(1), 41–56.
46.
RikerW.H.OrdeshookP.C. (1968). A theory of the Calculus of voting. American Political Science Review62(1), 25–42. DOI: 10.2307/1953324
47.
RochaR.R.MatsubayashiT. (2014). The politics of race and voter ID laws in the states: the return of Jim Crow?Political Research Quarterly67(3), 666–679.
48.
SpringerM.J. (2012). State electoral institutions and voter turnout in presidential elections, 1920–2000. State Politics & Policy Quarterly12(3), 252–283.
49.
StockemerD.RocherF. (2017) Age, political knowledge and electoral turnout, a case study of Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics55(1), 41–62.
50.
TimponeR.J. (1998). Structure, behavior and voter turnout in the united states. American Political Science Review92(11), 145–158.
VonnahmeG. (2012). Registration deadlines and turnout in context. Political Behavior34(4), 765–779.
53.
WolfingerR.RosenstoneS. (1980). Who votes?New Haven: Yale University Press.
54.
YuJ. (2019). Does state online voter registration increase voter turnout?Social Science Quarterly100(3), 620–634.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
