We examine how people’s emotional reactions to gun violence public service announcements (PSAs) influence information acquisition, policy preferences, and political engagement. Utilizing a non-student sample of more than 100 participants, we look people’s emotional reactions (i.e., anger, sadness, contempt, and fear) to two Sandy Hook Promise PSAs. We assess people’s emotional reactions by relying on two complimentary measures: the traditional self-report measures as well as facial expression analysis. We demonstrate that when people are feeling sad after watching the Sandy Hook Promise PSAs, they are significantly more likely to retain information from a news article about school violence. Furthermore, feelings of contempt and fear lead people to seek out additional information about gun violence. In addition, we find when people feel anger, contempt, and fear after watching the PSAs, they change their views of gun policies. Finally, fear and contempt increase people’s likelihood of becoming politically mobilized.
BagozziR. P.MooreD. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70.
2.
BarrettL. F. (1997). The relationships among momentary emotion experiences, personality descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1100–1110.
3.
BarrettL. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 1–23.
4.
BatraR.StaymanD. M. (1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 203–214.
5.
BecheurI.DasA. (2018). From elicitation to persuasion: Assessing the structure and effectiveness of differential emotions in anti-drunk-driving campaigns. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 83–102.
6.
BestS. J.KruegerB. S. (2011). Government monitoring and political participation in the United States: The distinct roles of anger and anxiety. American Politics Research, 39(1), 85–117.
7.
BodenhausenG. V.GabrielS.LinebergerM. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4), 320–323.
8.
BraderT. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. University of Chicago Press.
9.
ChaikenS. (1986). The heuristic model of persuasion. In ZannaM. P.HigginsE. T.HermanC. P. (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CivettiniA.RedlawskD. P. (2005). A feeling person’s game: Affect and voter information processing and learning in a campaign [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
DillardJ. P.NabiR. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56(S1), S123–S139.
13.
DillardJ. P.PeckE. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495.
14.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.HagerJ. C. (2002). FACS investigator’s guide. A Human Face.
FischerA. H.RosemanI. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(101), 103–115.
17.
FreimuthV. S.HammondS. L.EdgarT.MonahanJ. L. (1990). Reaching those at risk: A content-analytic study of AIDS PSAs. Communication Research, 17(6), 775–791.
18.
FrijdaN. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358.
19.
GreenM. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(S1), S163–S183.
20.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
21.
GroenendykE. W.BanksA. J. (2014). Emotional rescue: How affect helps partisans overcome collective action problems. Political Psychology, 35(3), 359–378.
22.
HaleJ.DillardJ. (1995). Fear appeals in health promotion campaigns: Too much, too little, or just right? In MaibachE.ParrottR. (Eds.), Designing health messages (pp. 65–80). SAGE Publications, Inc.
23.
HockleyN. (2020). Personal communication, May18, 2020.
24.
HutchingsV. L.ValentinoN. A.PhilpotT. S.WhiteI. K. (2006). Racial cues in campaign news: The effects of candidate issue distance on emotional responses, political attentiveness, and vote choice. In RedlawskD. (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 165–168). Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
IzardC. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
JonesM. D.McBethM. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.
28.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T. (1991). Feeling good, but not thinking straight: The impact of positive mood on persuasion. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 201–220). Wiley.
29.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment (pp. 820–829). University of Chicago Press.
30.
MenckenF. C.FroeseP. (2019). Gun culture in action. Social Problems, 66(1), 3–27.
31.
MerinoS. M. (2018). God and guns: Examining religious influences on gun control attitudes in the United States. Religions, 9(6), 189.
32.
MerryM. K. (2010). Emotional appeals in environmental group communications. American Politics Research, 38(5), 862–889.
33.
MerryM. K. (2016). Constructing policy narratives in 140 characters or less: The case of gun policy organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 44(4), 373–395.
34.
MillerD. A.CroninT.GarciaA. L.BranscombeN. R. (2009). The relative impact of anger and efficacy on collective action is affected by feelings of fear. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 445–462.
35.
O’KeefeG. J.ReidK. (1990). The uses and effects of public service advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2(1), 67–91.
36.
PaekH. J.HoveT.KimM.JeongH. J. (2011). Mechanisms of child abuse public service announcement effectiveness: Roles of emotional response and perceived effectiveness. Health Communication, 26(6), 534–545.
37.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press.
38.
RosemanI. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.
39.
RosemanI. (2018). Rejecting the unworthy: The causes, components, and consequences of contempt. In MasonM. (Ed.), The moral psychology of contempt (pp. 107–30). Roman and Littlefield.
40.
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.
41.
RyanT. J. (2012). What makes us click? Demonstrating incentives for angry discourse with digital-age field experiments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1138–1152.
42.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). Guilford Press.
43.
ShanahanE. A.McBethM. K.HathawayP. L. (2011). Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Politics & Policy, 39(3), 373–400.
44.
ShenL. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422.
45.
SmithN.LeiserowitzA. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948.
46.
TeixeiraT.WedelM.PietersR. (2012). Emotion-induced engagement in internet video advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 144–159.
47.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664.
48.
WitteK.AllenM. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.
49.
YzerM. C.SouthwellB. G.StephensonM. T. (2013). Inducing fear as a public communication campaign strategy. In RiceR. E.AtkinC. K. (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 163–176). SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
