Americans’ sense of external political efficacy—their belief in their ability to influence government decisions—has declined precipitously in recent decades, eroding the public’s confidence in our system of representative democracy. Scholars have long argued that involvement in civic associations can help ordinary Americans realize their political efficacy, yet a lack of longitudinal data on association members’ attitudes and behaviors has impeded efforts to test this claim. To collect such a dataset, we partnered with a national environmental association to conduct a unique panel study of members of eight state-level organizations. We show that members who get to know their association’s leaders believe that they have greater influence over government decisions. Our findings suggest that civic associations can strengthen their members’ efficacy by cultivating volunteer leadership and fostering relationships between members and leaders.
AndrewsK. T.GanzM.BaggettaM.HanH.LimC. (2010). Leadership, membership, and voice: Civic associations that work. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1191–1242.
4.
BaggettaM.HanH.AndrewsK. T. (2013). Leading associations: How individual characteristics and team dynamics generate committed leaders. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 544–573.
5.
BalchG. I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept of ‘sense of political efficacy.’Political Methodology, 1(2), 1–43.
6.
BeaumontE. (2011). Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 216–231.
7.
BemD. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.
8.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
9.
BimberB.FlanaginA. J.StohlC. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrownR. K.BrownR. E. (2003). Faith and works: Church-based social capital resources and African American political activism. Social Forces, 82(2), 617–641.
11.
CasselC. A. (1999). Voluntary associations, churches, and social participation theories of turnout. Social Science Quarterly, 80(3), 504–517.
12.
ChamberlainA. (2012). A time-series analysis of external efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 117–130.
13.
ChristensB. D.PetersonN. A.SpeerP. W. (2011). Community participation and psychological empowerment: Testing reciprocal causality using a cross-lagged panel design and latent constructs. Health Education and Behavior, 38(4), 339–347.
14.
ChristensB. D.SpeerP. W. (2011). Contextual influences on participation in community organizing: A multilevel longitudinal study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 253–263.
15.
De TocquevilleA. (2004 [1840]). Democracy in America. Translated by GoldhammerArthur. The Library of America.
16.
DurkheimE. (1964 [1933]). The division of labor in society. Translated by SimpsonGeorge. The Free Press.
17.
EastonD. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.
18.
FinkelS. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913.
19.
GanzM. (2009). Why David sometimes wins: Leadership, organization, and strategy in the California farm worker movement. Oxford University Press.
20.
GanzM. (2010). Leading change: Leadership, organization, and social movements. In NohriaN.KhuranaR. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 527–568). Harvard Business School Press.
21.
GilensM.PageB. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 564–581.
22.
HanH. (2014). How organizations develop activists: Civic associations and leadership in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
23.
HanH. (2016). The organizational roots of political activism: Field experiments on creating a relational context. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 296–307.
24.
HanH.SparksA. C.ToweryN. D. (2017). Opening up the black box: Citizen group strategies for engaging grassroots activism in the twenty-first century. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 6(1), 22–43.
25.
HirschE. (1990). Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 243–254.
26.
IyengarS. (1980). Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 249–256.
LubellM. (2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 431–454.
29.
McAdamD. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
30.
McFarlandD. A.ThomasR. J. (2006). Bowling young: How youth voluntary associations influence adult political participation. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 401–425.
31.
McKennaE.HanH. (2014). Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 million volunteers transformed campaigning in America. Oxford University Press.
32.
MoeT. M. (1981). Toward a broader view of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 43(2), 531–543.
33.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Indiana University Press.
34.
OlsenM. E. (1982). Participatory pluralism: Political participation and influence in the United States and Sweden. Nelson-Hall.
35.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
36.
OstermanP. (2006). Overcoming oligarchy: Culture and agency in social movement organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 622–649.
37.
PasekJ.FeldmanL.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2008). Schools as incubators of democratic participation: Building long-term political efficacy with civic education. Applied Developmental Science, 12(1), 26–37.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
40.
RogersD. L.BultenaG. L.BarbK. H. (1975). Voluntary association membership and political participation: An exploration of the mobilization hypothesis. The Sociological Quarterly, 16(3), 305–318.
41.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. MacMillan Publishing Company.
42.
RothenbergL. S. (1992). Linking citizens to government: Interest group politics at Common Cause. Cambridge University Press.
43.
ShafferS. (1981). A multivariate explanation of decreasing turnout in presidential elections, 1960–1976. American Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 68–96.
44.
ShaikoR. G. (1999). Voices and echoes for the environment: Public interest representation in the 1990s and beyond. Columbia University Press.
45.
SkocpolT. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press.
46.
SobierajS.WhiteD. (2005). Taxing political life: Reevaluating the relationship between voluntary association membership, political engagement, and the state. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(4), 739–764.
47.
TerriquezV. (2011). Schools for democracy: Labor union participation and Latino immigrant parents’ school-based civic engagement. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 581–601.
48.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America. Harper and Row.
49.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
50.
WarrenM. R. (2001). Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalize American democracy. Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
