Research suggests that organizational structure can influence the ability of actors to discriminate. In this research note, we examine whether the structure of state legislatures affects observed discrimination in correspondent audit studies. We find that increased legislative professionalization is associated with reduced discrimination against racial minorities. By analyzing thousands of emails collected in a prior study, we find that legislative professionalization is related to a higher likelihood that staffers respond to email contacts and staffers are less likely to discriminate against racial minorities across multiple measures of discrimination. Our findings emphasize the importance of substantively relevant heterogeneity in audit studies and identify a potential mitigator of discrimination—legislative professionalism. Our results also highlight the importance of staffers in representation and the legislative process.
AndersenS. C.GuulT. S. (2019). Reducing minority discrimination at the front line—Combined survey and field experimental evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 429–444.
2.
BanerjeeR.ReitzJ. G.OreopoulosP. (2018). Do large employers treat racial minorities more fairly? An analysis of Canadian field experiment data. Canadian Public Policy, 44(1), 1–12.
3.
BarretoM. A.NuñoS. A.SanchezG. R.WalkerH. L. (2018). The racial implications of voter identification laws in America. American Politics Research, 47(2), 238–249.
4.
BerryW. D.BerkmanM. B.SchneidermanS. (2000). Legislative professionalism and incumbent reelection: The development of institutional boundaries. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 859–874.
5.
BiggersD. R.HanmerM. J. (2017). Understanding the adoption of voter identification laws in the American states. American Politics Research, 45(4), 560–588.
6.
BowenD. C.GreeneZ. (2014). Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14(3), 277–296.
ButlerD. M.BroockmanD. E. (2011). Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477.
9.
ButlerD. M.CrabtreeC. (2017). Moving beyond measurement: Adapting audit studies to test bias-reducing interventions. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 4, 57–67.
10.
CoppockA. (2018). Avoiding post-treatment bias in audit experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(1), 1–4.
11.
CostaM. (2017). How responsive are political elites? A meta-analysis of experiments on public officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 4(1), 241–254.
12.
CottrellD.HerronM. C.RodriguezJ. M.SmithD. A. (2019). Mortality, incarceration, and African American disenfranchisement in the contemporary United States. American Politics Research, 47(2), 195–237.
13.
DeGregorioC. (1995). Staff utilization in the US Congress: Committee chairs and senior aides. Polity, 28(2), 261–275.
14.
FoxH. W.HammondS. W. (1977). Congressional staffs: The invisible force in American lawmaking. Free Press.
15.
GaddisS. M. (2018). An introduction to audit studies in the social sciences. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 3–44). Springer.
16.
GroseC. R.MangumM.MartinC. (2007). Race, political empowerment, and constituency service: Descriptive representation and the hiring of African-American Congressional staff. Polity, 39(4), 449–478.
17.
HeßM.Von ScheveC.SchuppJ.WagnerA.WagnerG. G. (2018). Are political representatives more risk-loving than the electorate? Evidence from German federal and state parliaments. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–7.
18.
HerrickR. (2011). Representation and institutional design. Lexington Books.
19.
HerrickR.FisherS. H. (2007). Are citizen legislators less likely to violate the official ethics standards? In Representing America (pp. 74–80). Lexington Books.
20.
Hertel-FernandezA.MildenbergerM.StokesL. C. (2018). Legislative staff and representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 113, 1–18.
21.
HirschmanD.BoskE.A. (2019). Standardizing biases: Selection devices and the quantification of Race. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649219844797.
22.
JonesJ. R. (2017). Racing through the halls of Congress: The “black nod” as an adaptive strategy for surviving in a raced institution. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 14(1), 165–187.
23.
KallaJ.RosenbluthF.TeeleD. L. (2018). Are you my mentor? A field experiment on gender, ethnicity, and political self-starters. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 337–341.
24.
KousserT. (2005). Term limits and the dismantling of state legislative professionalism. Cambridge University Press.
25.
KousserT.PhillipsJ. H. (2009). Who blinks first? Legislative patience and bargaining with governors. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 55–86.
26.
LipskyM. (1983). Street-level bureaucracy (30th Anniversary Edition): Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
LoewenP. J.MacKenzieM. K. (2018). Service representation in a federal system: A field experiment. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(2), 93–107.
28.
MaestasC. (2000). Professional legislatures and ambitious politicians: Policy responsiveness of state institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 663–690.
29.
MatthewsD. R. (1959). The folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to group norms and legislative effectiveness. American Political Science Review, 53(4), 1064–1089.
30.
McCrainJ. (2018). Revolving door lobbyists and the value of Congressional staff connections. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1369–1383.
31.
MladenkaK. R. (1977). Citizen demand and bureaucratic response: Direct dialing democracy in a major American city. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12(3), 273–290.
32.
MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB. (2017). The effects of Congressional staff networks in the US House of Representatives. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 745–761.
33.
PagerD.ShepherdH. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181–209.
34.
PertschukM. (2017). When the senate worked for US: The invisible role of staffers in countering corporate lobbies. Vanderbilt University Press.
35.
RomzekB. S.UtterJ. A. (1997). Congressional legislative staff: Political professionals or clerks?American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1251–1279.
36.
RosenthalA. (1996). Drawing the line: Legislative ethics in the states. University of Nebraska Press.
37.
RosenthalA. (2008). Engines of democracy: Politics and policymaking in state legislatures. SAGE.
38.
SalisburyR. H.ShepsleK. A. (1981). US Congressman as enterprise. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 559–576.
39.
ShefferL.LoewenP. J.SorokaS.WalgraveS.SheaferT. (2018). Nonrepresentative representatives: An experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 302–321.
40.
SquireP. (1992). Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 69–79.
41.
SquireP. (1993). Professionalization and public opinion of state legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 55(2), 479–491.
42.
SquireP. (2007). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The squire index revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 211–227.
43.
ThomasJ. C. (1986). The personal side of street-level bureaucracy: Discrimination or neutral competence?Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(1), 84–100.
44.
VuoloM.UggenC.LagesonS. (2018). To match or not to match? Statistical and substantive considerations in audit design and analysis. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 119–140). Springer.
45.
WeberM. (1922). Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft [Economy and Society] University of California Press.
46.
WeissertC. S.WeissertW. G. (2000). State legislative staff influence in health policy making. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(6), 1121–1148.
47.
ZinielC. E. (2009). Faces in the office: Racial employment segregation among Congressional staff. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1434290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
