While scholars have shown strong interest in the role of emotions in politics, questions remain about the connections between emotions and political intolerance. First, it is not clear which emotion (if any) is likely to produce intolerance toward one’s disliked groups, with different studies favoring hatred, anger, or fear. Second, it is unclear whether these effects of emotion are moderated by sophistication, as some conventional political thought argues. Do the less-sophisticated rely on emotions when making judgments, therefore being less tolerant than sophisticates, who rely on reason? Here, we test both hypotheses using a large representative sample Americans. We find that hatred, anger, and fear are significantly but only modestly related to political intolerance. Moreover, the effects of emotions on intolerance are not consistently stronger among the unsophisticated. These findings provide little support for the conventional assumption that the less-sophisticated rely on their emotions in making political judgments.
AverillJ. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.
2.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Societal-psychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430-1453.
3.
ClaassenC. (2016). Group entitlement, anger and participation in intergroup violence. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 127-148.
4.
DahlR. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Delli-CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
ErisenC.Kentmen-CinC. (2017). Tolerance and perceived threat toward Muslim immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands. European Union Politics, 18, 3-26.
7.
FrijdaN.KuipersP.ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal and action tendency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
8.
GibsonJ. L. (1998). A sober second thought: An experiment in persuading Russians to tolerate. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 819-850.
9.
GibsonJ. L. (2006). Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer’s Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 21-34.
10.
GibsonJ. L.GouwsA. (2003). Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in political persuasion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HaasI. J.CunninghamW. A. (2014). The uncertainty paradox: Perceived threat moderates the effect of uncertainty on political tolerance. Political Psychology, 35, 291-302.
12.
HalperinE. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 713-736.
13.
HalperinE.Canetti-NisimD.Hirsch-HoeflerS. (2009). The central role of group-based hatred as an emotional antecedent of political intolerance: Evidence from Israel. Political Psychology, 30, 93-123.
14.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.CasseseE. (2007). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In Russel NeumanW.MarcusG. E.CriglerA. N.MackuenM. (Eds.), The affect effect: The dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202-230). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
KuklinskiJ. H.RiggleE.OttatiV.SchwarzN.WyerR. S.Jr. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-27.
16.
LernerJ. S.GoldbergJ. H.TetlockP. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563-574.
17.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2001). Fear, anger and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159.
18.
LodgeM.TaberC. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26, 455-482.
19.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive actions in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
20.
MarcusG. E.Russell NeumanW.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
MarcusG. E.Russell NeumanW.MacKuenM. (2017). Measuring emotional response: Comparing alternative approaches to measurement. Political Science Research and Methods, 5, 733-754.
22.
MarcusG. E.SullivanJ. L.Theiss-MorseE.StevensD. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26, 949-963.
23.
MarcusG. E.SullivanJ. L.Theiss-MorseE.WoodS. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MarquandtD. W. (1980). Comment: You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 87-91.
25.
MoggK.MathewsA.BirdC.Macgregor-MorrisR. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1230-1237.
26.
PeffleyM.HutchisonM. L.ShamirM. (2015). The impact of persistent terrorism on political tolerance: Israel, 1980 to 2011. American Political Science Review, 109, 817-832.
27.
PetersenM.SlothuusR.StubagerR.TogebyL. (2011). Freedom for all? The strength and limits of political tolerance. British Journal of Political Science, 41, 581-597.
28.
PetersenR. D. (2002). Understanding ethnic violence: Fear, hatred, and resentment in twentieth-century Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RahnW. M. (2000). Affect as information: The role of public mood in political reasoning. In LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D.PopkinS. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 130-150). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
RudolphT. J.GanglA.StevensD. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. Journal of Politics, 62, 1189-1197.
31.
ShiehG. (2010). On the misconception of multicollinearity in detection of moderating effects: Multicollinearity is not always detrimental. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 483-507.
32.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743-756.
33.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2005). Aggression, hatred, and other emotions. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 359-376). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
SnidermanP. M.BrodyR. A.TetlockP. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
StaubE. (2005). The origins and evolution of hate, with notes on prevention. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 51-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
SullivanJ. L.HendriksH. (2009). Public support for civil liberties pre- and post-9/11. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 375-391.
37.
SullivanJ. L.PieresonJ. E.MarcusG. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
SullivanJ. L.WalshP.ShamirM.BarnumD. G.GibsonJ. L. (1993). Why politicians are more tolerant: Selective recruitment and socialization among political elites in Britain, Israel, New Zealand and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 51-76.
39.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 119-136.
40.
TauschN.SpearsR.SaabR.BeckerJ. C.ChristO.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148.
41.
Theiss-MorseE.MarcusG.SullivanJ. L. (1993). Passion and reason in political life. In MarcusG. E.HansonR. L. (Eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public (pp. 249-272). University Park: Penn State Press.
42.
WangT. Y.ChenL. (2008). Political tolerance in Taiwan: Democratic elitism in a polity under threat. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 780-801.
43.
ZinniF. P.MatteiF.RhodebeckL. A. (1997). The structure of attitudes toward groups: A comparison of experts and novices. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 595-626.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
