American civil religion places the U.S. Constitution on a pedestal. Although this veneration is well-documented, it is unclear where it originates and why other constitutions do not attract the same reverence. We develop a measure of constitutional respect and conduct a randomized survey experiment testing whether new information can change respondents’ evaluations of their state or national constitutions. We find that people do respond to new information about state constitutions, but not to information about the national document, suggesting that Americans view the U.S. Constitution with the sort of veneration and reverence James Madison advocated, while viewing their state constitutions through a more Jeffersonian lens of legitimacy, one that favors continually revising these constitutions to meet the living generation’s needs.
BaileyJ. D. (2015). James Madison and constitutional imperfection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
3.
BrennanT. (2017). Thomas Jefferson and the living constitution. The Journal of Politics, 79, 936-948.
4.
BreslinB. (2009). Is there a paradox in amending a sacred text?Maryland Law Review, 69, 66-77.
5.
BrownA. R. (2011). Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists? Accuracy and completeness of coverage. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, 339-343.
6.
BrownA. R. (2018). Utah politics and government: American democracy among a unique electorate. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
7.
CannD. M.YatesJ. (2016). These estimable courts: Understanding public perceptions of state judicial institutions and legal policy-making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
Council of State Governments. (1996-2015). Book of the states. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
9.
DahlR. A. (2003). How Democratic is the American Constitution?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
DinanJ. J. (2006). The American state constitutional tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
11.
DixonR. (2011). Constitutional amendment rules: A comparative perspective (University of Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 347).
12.
EcklesD. L.KamC. D.MaestasC. L.ShaffnerB. F. (2014). Risk attitudes and the incumbency advantage. Political Behavior, 36, 731-749.
13.
EidelmanS.PattershallJ.CrandallC. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993-998.
14.
ElkinsZ.GinsburgT.MeltonJ. (2009). The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FarrandM. (1911). The Framing of the Constitution of the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
FarkasS.JohnsonJ.DuffettA. (2002). Knowing it by heart: Americans consider the Constitution and its meaning. Philadelphia, PA: National Constitution Center.
17.
FordP. L. (Ed.). (1905). The writings of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. 12). New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
18.
GardnerJ. A. (1992). The failed discourse of state constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review, 90, 761-837.
19.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (1996). Civics is not enough: Teaching barbarics in K-12. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29, 57-62.
20.
HuffC.TingleyD. (2015). Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(2):1-12. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648
21.
JeffersonT. (1789, September6). Letter to James Madison.
22.
JeffersonT. (1823). Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Adamantios Coray, October. Accessed via Founders Early Access.
23.
JeffersonT. (1824, June5). Letter to John Cartwright.
24.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.
25.
KamC. D. (2012). Risk attitudes and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 817-836.
26.
KamC. D.SimasE. N. (2010). Risk orientations and policy frames. The Journal of Politics, 72, 381-396.
27.
KamC. D.SimasE. N. (2012). Risk attitudes, candidate characteristics, and vote choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 747-760.
28.
KellerM. (1981). The politics of state constitutional revision, 1820-1930. In HallK. L.HymanH. M.SigalL. V. (Eds.), The constitutional convention as an amending device, 94, 113-90. Washington, DC: American Historical Association & American Political Science Association.
29.
LevinsonS. V. (1988). Constitutional faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
LevinsonS. V. (2006). Our undemocratic constitution: Where the constitution goes wrong (and how we the people can correct it). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
LevinsonS. V. (2012). Framed: America’s 51 constitutions and the crisis of governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
LevinsonS. V.BlakeW. D. (2016). What Americans think about constitutional reform: Some data and reflections. Ohio State Law Journal, 77, 211-236.
LutzD. S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88, 355-370.
35.
RakoveJ. N. (Ed.). (1999). James Madison: Writings. Boone, IA: Library of America.
36.
ManzerR. A. (2001). A science of politics: Hume, the federalist, and the politics of constitutional attachment. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 508-518.
37.
MutzD. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SamuelsonW.ZeckhauserR. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
42.
SinkM. (2004). Restoring our ancient constitutional faith. University of Colorado Law Review, 75, 921-962.
43.
StephanopoulosN. O.VersteegM. (2016). The contours of constitutional approval. Washington University Law Review, 94, 113-190.
44.
TarrG. A. (1998). Understanding state constitutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.
46.
VermeuleA. (2006). Constitutional amendments and common law. In BaumanR. W.KahanaT. (Eds.), The least examined branch: The role of legislatures in the constitutional state. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WashingtonH. A. (Ed.). (1853). The writings of Thomas Jefferson, being his autobiography, correspondence, reports, messages, addresses, and other writings, official and private. Washington, DC: Taylor & Maury.
48.
ZackinE. (2013). Looking for rights in all the wrong places: Why state constitutions contain America’s positive rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
ZinkJ. R.DawesC. T. (2016). The dead hand of the past? Toward an understanding of “constitutional veneration.”Political Behavior, 38, 535-560.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
