Are political candidates perceived differently based on the presence or absence of a southern accent? To address this question, we employ an experimental design that explores reactions to political candidates with a southern accent and a regionally neutral accent. We focus on perceptions of three general categories of candidate characteristics: candidate traits, candidate affect, and candidate issue positions. Overall, we discover that candidates with a southern accent are viewed more negatively, and they are thought to hold more conservative policy positions, than candidates with no discernible accent. Our findings suggest that the southern accent provides a heuristic that affects how voters perceive candidates.
AlexanderD.AndersenK. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 527-545.
2.
AnsolabehereS.SnyderJ. M.Jr.StewartC.III. (2000). Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 17-34.
3.
AtkinsC. P. (1993). Do employment recruiters discriminate on the basis of nonstandard dialect?Journal of Employment Counseling, 30, 108-118.
4.
AtkinsonM. D.EnosR. D.HillS. J. (2009). Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face–vote correlation caused by candidate selection?Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 229-249.
5.
BaileyG. (2001). The relationship between the AAVE and White vernaculars in the American South: Some phonological evidence. In LanehartS. (Ed.), Sociocultural and historical contexts of African American vernacular English (pp. 53-92). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
6.
BanducciS. A.KarpJ. A.ThrasherM.RallingsC. (2008). Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. Political Psychology, 29, 903-917.
7.
BauerN. M. (2015). Who stereotypes female candidates? Identifying individual differences in stereotype reliance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3, 94-110.
8.
BirchD.McPhailJ. (1999). Does accent matter in international television advertisements?International Journal of Advertising, 18, 251-268.
9.
BlackE.BlackM. (2002). The rise of southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BlackE.BlackM. (2007). Divided America: The ferocious power struggle in American politics. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
11.
BoucherC. J.HammockG. S.McLaughlinS. D.HenryK. N. (2013). Perceptions of competency as a function of accent. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 18(1), 27-32.
12.
BrooksD. J. (2011). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CargileA. C. (2000). Evaluations of employment sustainability: Does accent always matter?Journal of Employment Counseling, 37, 165-177.
14.
ConoverP. J.FeldmanS. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95-126.
15.
ConoverP. J.FeldmanS. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940.
16.
CooperC. A.KnottsH. G. (2017). The Resilience of southern identity: Why the South still matters in the minds of its people. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
17.
De La ZerdaN.HopperR. (1979). Employment interviewers’ reactions to Mexican American speech. Communication Monographs, 46, 136-134.
18.
DeShieldsO. W.Jr.de los SantosG. (2000). Salesperson’s accent as a globalization issue. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42, 29-46.
19.
DolanK. (2014). When does gender matter? Women candidates and gender stereotypes in American elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
DolanK.LynchT. (2014). It takes a survey: Understanding gender stereotypes, abstract attitudes, and voting for women candidates. American Politics Research, 42, 656-676.
21.
FeldmanS.ConoverP. J. (1983). Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. The Journal of Politics, 45, 810-839.
22.
FennoR. F.Jr. (2000). Congress at the grassroots: Representational change in the South, 1970-1998. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
23.
FishmanJ. A. (1971). Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
24.
FoxR. L.SmithE. R. (1998). The role of candidate sex in voter decision-making. Political Psychology, 19, 405-419.
25.
FridlandV. (2008). Regional differences in perceiving vowel tokens on southerness, education, and pleasantness rating. Language Variation and Change, 20, 67-83.
26.
FridlandV.BartlettK. (2006). Correctness, pleasantness, and degree of difference ratings across regions. American Speech, 81, 358-386.
27.
FuertesJ.GottdienerW.HelenaM.GilbertT.GilesH. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 120-133.
28.
FultonS. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 303-314.
29.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
30.
GilesH.BillingsA. (2004). Assessing Language Attitudes: Speaker Evaluation Studies. In DaviesA.ElderC. (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 187-209). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
GilesH.WilsonP.ConwayA. (1981). Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceive employment suitability. Language Sciences, 3, 91-103.
32.
GlaserJ. (1996). Race, campaign politics and the realignment in the South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
GlaserJ. (2005). The hand of the past in contemporary southern politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
GriffinL. J. (2000). Southern distinctiveness, yet again, or, why America still needs the South. Southern Cultures, 6(3), 47-72.
35.
HartleyL. C. (2005). The consequences of conflicting stereotypes: Bostonian perceptions of U.S. dialects. American Speech, 80, 388-405.
36.
HeatonH.NygaardL. C. (2011). Charm or harm: Effect of passage content on listener attitudes toward American English accents. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 202-211.
37.
HoD. E.ImaiK. (2008). Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment: The California alphabet lottery, 1978-2002. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 216-240.
38.
HopperR.WilliamsF. (1973). Speech characteristics and employability. Communications Monographs, 40, 296-302.
39.
KahnK. F. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of U.S. senate candidates. The Journal of Politics, 54, 497-517.
40.
KalinR.RaykoD. S. (1978). Discrimination in evaluative judgments against foreign-accented job candidates. Psychological Reports, 43(Suppl. 3), 1203-1209.
41.
KinzlerK. D.DeJesusJ. M. (2012). Northern = smart and Southern = nice: The development of accent attitudes in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1146-1158.
42.
KlofstadC. A. (2016). Candidate voice pitch influences election outcomes. Political Psychology, 37, 725-738.
43.
KlofstadC. A.AndersonR. C.PetersS. (2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 279(1738), 2698-2704.
44.
KochJ. W. (1999). Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 84-96.
45.
KochJ. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological operations?The Journal of Politics, 62, 414-429.
46.
KrosnickJ. A.MillerJ. M.TichyM. P. (2004). An unrecognized need for ballot reform: The effects of candidate name order on election outcomes. In CrigerA. N.JustinM. R.McCafferyE. J. (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform (pp. 51-73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
LodgeM.TaberC. (2013). The rationalizing voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MatsubayashiT.UedaM. (2011). Political knowledge and the use of candidate race as a voting cue. American Politics Research, 39, 380-413.
50.
McDermottM. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 270-283.
51.
McDermottM. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895-918.
52.
MillerW. E.ShanksJ. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
53.
MontgomeryM. (1993). The southern accent—Alive and well. Southern Cultures, 1(1), 47-64.
54.
MoralesA. C.ScottM. L.YorkstonE. A. (2012). The role of accent standardness in message preference and recall. Journal of Advertising, 41, 33-46.
55.
155 Cong. Record 264 (2009) (statement of Rep. Louie Gohmert).
56.
PrestonD. R. (1999). A language attitude approach to the perception of regional variety. In PrestonD. (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. 359-373). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
57.
RakicT.SteffensM. C.MummendeyA. (2011). Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 16-29.
58.
ReedJ. S. (2000). The “southern accent.”Southern Cultures, 6, 102-103.
59.
ReyA. (1977). Accent and employability: Language attitudes. Language Sciences, 47, 7-12.
60.
RichesP.FoddyM. (1989). Ethnic accent as a status cue. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 197-206.
61.
SchneiderM. C.BosA. L. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35, 245-266.
SearlesK.FowlerE. F.RidoutT. N.StrachP.ZuberK. (2017). The effects of men’s and women’s voices in political advertising. Journal of Political Marketing. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15377857.2017.1330723
64.
SigelR. (1996). Ambition and accommodation: How women view gender relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
SimienE. M. (2005). Race, gender, and linked fate. Journal of Black Studies, 35, 529-550.
66.
SwiggerN. (2012). What you see is what you get: Drawing inferences from campaign imagery. Political Communication, 29, 367-386.
67.
TigueC. C.BorakD. J.O’ConnorJ. J. M.SchandlC.FeinbergD. R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 210-216.
68.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626.
69.
TrudgillP. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 179-195.
WolframW.ReaserJ. (2014). Talkin’ tar heel: How our voices tell the story of North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
